Dauntless Aruna: The pioneer of Euthanasia debate breathes her last

“He will wipe away every tear from their eyes, and death shall be no more, neither shall there be mourning, nor crying, nor pain anymore, for the former things have passed away.”- Revelation 21:4After fighting bravely for 42 years, lying in a vegetative state, Aruna Shanbag has passed away today. She spent her final week battling a serious bout of pneumonia and was breathing with the help of a ventilator.She was rushed out of the tiny room attached to Ward number 4 that has been her abode for four decades now. The nurses tending to her noticed that she posed difficulties in breathing and immediately rushed her to the medical ICU.KEM Hospital Dean Avinash Supe has made a public appeal to help trace any relatives or people close to Shanbag who can get in touch with the hospital immediately.I call it a fight in the beginning of the article, because it surely has been one. Shanbag sparked the worldwide debate on mercy killing or euthanasia, while being confined to a hospital room for more than 4 decades.The pretty, young and independent woman that she was, Shanbag was working as a nurse at Mumbai’s King Edward Memorial (KEM) Hospital when she was sexually assaulted by a hospital ward boy in 1973. The ward boy, Sohanlal Bhartha Walmiki, throttled her with a dog chain, cutting off blood and oxygen supply to her brain resulting in injuries to the brain stem and cervical chord injury. She had been in a vegetative state since and confined to a bed at the KEM hospital where nurses and the hospital staff take care of her. In one day, her dreams, her aspirations, her life was snatched away from her.The assailant was traced soon after the crime and was convicted. He served two concurrent seven year sentences. Little is known about his whereabouts since his release from the prison.The charge under which he was convicted was stealing her jewellery and watch since initial medical examination ruled out rape as her hymen was intact. She was menstruating on that day. And so, he did not penetrate her but sodomized her instead. Subsequent medical reports proved that she bled for days together from the anus.Speaking to Zee Media today, Former journalist and author Pinky Virani, said "Her actual death happened in 1973 (referring to the tragic attack on her) now what has happened is her legal death. Our Aruna has given our country a big thing in form of a law on passive euthanasia."Ms. Virani had narrated the story of the ailing nurse in her 1998 non-fiction book called 'Aruna's Story', while Duttakumar Desai wrote the Marathi play, 'Katha Arunachi' in 1994-95, which was staged under director Vinay Apte in 2002. In the last part of the novel Pinki says: “How I wish I could give life to Aruna’s lifeless brain”.Ms. Virani then preferred a petition before the Apex Court after following her case history since 1980. Her prayer before the Apex Court was to allow Aruna to die peacefully by ordering for cessation of medical care extended to her by the doctors and staff at KEM Hospital.However, the counsel for the hospital was unequivocal in denying death to Aruna on behest of the Court and elucidated various instances wherein the patient communicated in gestures her aversion/interest to certain foods, sounds and people which only went on to suggest that there existed life within her and by allowing for euthanasia to be administered, the Hon’ble Court would order for termination of life and thereby set a dangerous precedent for all critically ill patients.The word euthanasia, originated in Greece means a good death. Euthanasia is the intentional premature termination of another person’s life either by direct intervention (active euthanasia) or by withholding life-prolonging measures and resources (passive euthanasia), either at the express or implied request of that person (voluntary euthanasia), or in the absence of such approval (non-voluntary euthanasia). It is non-voluntary euthanasia that has forever been the primary reason to oppose mercy killing as opponents of the idea have regularly said that mercy and killing do not go together, no matter what the circumstances.In a landmark judgment, the Supreme Court went on distinguish between ‘active’ and ‘passive’ euthanasia and held that causing the death of a person who is in a permanent vegetative state, with no chance of recovery, by withdrawing artificial life support is not a “positive act of killing”.A Bench of Justices Markandey Katju and Gyansudha Misra held that the difference between active and passive euthanasia was that in active euthanasia something is done to end the patient’s life, while in passive euthanasia something is not done that would have preserved the patient’s life and the latter could be permitted on a case-by-case basis. The Hon’ble Court also added that the judgment allowing passive euthanasia will remain in force until such time as Parliament enacts a suitable law on euthanasia.A plea for voluntary passive euthanasia was referred to a Constitution Bench in...

Dauntless Aruna: The pioneer of Euthanasia debate breathes her last

Apoorva Mandhani

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Dauntless Aruna: The pioneer of Euthanasia debate breathes her last

Apoorva Mandhani

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers