Top
News Updates

Harsher Punishments Required For Running Ill-Equipped Fake Hospitals: Andhra Pradesh HC [Read Order]

Ashok K.M
21 Oct 2017 7:07 AM GMT
Harsher Punishments Required For Running Ill-Equipped Fake Hospitals: Andhra Pradesh HC [Read Order]
Your free access to Live Law has expired
To read the article, get a premium account.
    Your Subscription Supports Independent Journalism
Subscription starts from
599+GST
(For 6 Months)
Premium account gives you:
  • Unlimited access to Live Law Archives, Weekly/Monthly Digest, Exclusive Notifications, Comments.
  • Reading experience of Ad Free Version, Petition Copies, Judgement/Order Copies.
Already a subscriber?

Emphasizing the need of bringing in certain statutory changes in the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, 1971 and Rules 2003, and TS Allopathic Medical Care Establishments (Registration and Regulations) Act 2002 and Rules, 2007,, the Andhra High Court has observed that, as per the relevant provisions of the Acts, while the establishment and running a medical facility without licence is made punishable, the punishment is only by way of a fine, which is monitory in nature, which is hardly a deterrent in the present world for unscrupulous elements to establish and run ill-equipped fake hospitals.

Justice Challa Kodanda Ram also observed that in the Medical Termination of Pregnancy Act, while in Section 5(2) punishment is provided for a person carrying out termination of pregnancy by other than a registered practitioner, there is total absence of any provision dealing with a medical practitioner transgressing the provisions of the MTP Act and Rules.

The court was considering a writ plea of a hospital in which allegedly an illegal abortion took place and notice was issued to seize the hospital.

A plain reading of Section 8(2) of the TSAPMC Est. Act permits only seizure of equipment, articles or documents for the purpose of examination, analysis, investigation or evidence but not the hospital per se, the court observed.

Referring to relevant provisions, it said: “This court has no option, except to declare the seizure of the hospital as impermissible, and in those circumstances, there shall be a direction to the respondent authorities to remove the seals.”

Read the Order Here

Next Story