Courts Can't Interfere In Court-Martial Merely On Compassionate Grounds If Proceedings Not Irregular: J&K&L High Court

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh has held that courts cannot interfere with court-martial proceedings merely on grounds of compassion or if the punishment appears excessive, provided the proceedings are conducted in strict conformity with law.A Division Bench of Justices Sanjeev Kumar and Sanjay Parihar set aside an Armed Forces Tribunal (AFT) order that had modified the...

Registered Cranes, Excavators Are 'Motor Vehicle' If Road Use Permitted, Insurer Liable Even If Accident Occurs In Mine: MP High Court

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has held that earth moving machines like road rollers, excavators, or cranes, if duly registered with the Transport Department under the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 and have permission for normal road use, qualify the definition of 'motor vehicle'.The bench of Justice Himanshu Joshi further held that such machines will then make the insurance company liable for...

Pre-Cognisance Hearing U/S 223 BNSS Is Mandatory Safeguard, Failure To Comply Vitiates Process: Patna High Court

The Patna High Court recently held that the proviso to Section 223(1) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS) is mandatory, emphasizing that a pre-cognizance hearing constitutes an essential procedural safeguard for the accused. The Court further observed that any opportunity granted to the accused during the summoning stage cannot cure the defect arising from non-compliance with...

Delhi High Court Permanently Bars Lubricant Maker From Using Castrol-Like Trademarks And Packaging

The Delhi High Court has permanently restrained ZRH Lubes, an automative lubricant maker from using marks such as CREMESTROL, ACTION, MADMAXX ACTION logo, and packaging, after finding them deceptively similar to Castrol Limited's registered trademarks and trade dress.The order was passed ex-parte on November 6, 2025, by Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora, as ZRH failed to file a written...

Estranged Husband Entitled To Compensation Towards Loss Of Consortium Upon Wife's Death In Road Accident: MP High Court

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has granted compensation towards loss of consortium to a man, for the death of his wife, despite the fact that the couple had been living separately.The court, citing the case of United India Insurance Company Ltd v Satinder Kaur [(2021) 11 SCC 780], reiterated that the principle of consortium applies to spousal, parental and filial consortium and applies even...

Delhi High Court Issues Notice On Plea Challenging Bar On Appeals Against CCI Settlement Orders

The Delhi High Court has issued notice on a plea challenging the provisions barring filing of appeal or judicial review against the settlement orders passed by the Competition Commission of India (CCI). A division bench comprising Chief Justice DK Upadhyaya and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela sought response of the Union Government through Ministry of Corporate Affairs and CCI within six weeks....

"Motorcycles Not Meant To Be Used As Passenger Vehicles”: Karnataka Govt Tells High Court On Bike-Taxi Ban

The Karnataka High Court on Thursday heard appeals filed by Rapido, Uber and Ola against a single-judge order that had barred bike-taxi operations in the State until guidelines were framed under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Appearing for the State, Advocate General Shashi Kiran Shetty told the division bench that “motorcycle cannot be a transport vehicle”, insisting that the...

Kerala High Court Seeks Bar Council's Stand On Lawyers' Plea Alleging It Charged 'Excess' Fees For Enrolment

The Kerala High Court on Friday (November 14) sought the State Bar Council's stand while considering a plea preferred by seven lawyers challenging 'excess' fees charged by the body to conduct their enrolments.Justice V.G. Arun today gave time to the standing counsel to take instructions from the Bar Council of Kerala (BCK) regarding the same.In the plea, the petitioners, who are members of...

DRC-03 Payments Made During GST Search Not Voluntary; Refund Cannot Be Rejected Through Deficiency Memos: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court holds that payments made by assessee through Form GST DRC-03 at the time of search or pursuant to an investigation cannot be treated as 'voluntary payments' when amount was not determined through any formal assessment or adjudication. A Bench comprising of Justice M. Nagaprasanna, quashed deficiency memos issued by the Deputy Commissioner of Central Tax...

Claims Under 'Roshni Act' Void Ab-Initio, Any Vesting Of Ownership Rights Extinguished From Inception: J&K&L High Court

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court has held that the Jammu and Kashmir State Lands (Vesting of Ownership to Occupants) Act, 2001 (“Roshni Act”) having been declared unconstitutional, contrary to law, and void ab initio cannot form the basis of any legal right, title, or claim. The Court ruled that all actions, applications, and entitlements sought under the Roshni Act stand...

Kerala High Court Asks CBFC To Reconsider Haal Movie Certification Issue, Filmmakers Decide To Delete Beef Biryani Scene, Few Dialogues

The Kerala High Court on Friday (November 14) asked the makers of Shane Nigam starrer 'Haal' to re-approach the Central Board of Film Certification.Justice V.G. Arun allowed the plea and quashed the CBFC's decision. The Court observed:"In the case at hand it is clear that, instead of judging the film as would be done by an ordinary prudent person, the Board's focus was on whether the film...

Income Tax Act | Interest On Loan Advanced To Company Not Deductible Against Salary Income: Karnataka High Court

The Karnataka High Court has held that a loan raised by mortgaging property and advancing to a company does not constitute business expenditure, and the interest is not deductible against salary income. The bench opined that unless expenditure is incurred in the course of the business or professional service, the assessee is not entitled to a deduction, merely due to it being incurred...