High Courts
Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh High Court Quarterly Digest: January To March 2025
Nominal Index:M/S K.P Singh Lau Through its proprietor Kavinder Pal Singh Vs Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 1M/S SAWALKOTE PROSJEKTU TVIKLING AS (“SPAS") Vs UT Of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 2Mohammad Yousuf Mir & Ors. v. UT of J&K & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 3Hilal Ahmad Mir Vs Directorate Of Enforcement 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 4Syed Tajamul Bashir Vs Farooq Ahmad Lone 2025 LiveLaw...
Bombay High Court Quarterly Digest: January To March 2025
Citations: 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 1 to 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 122Nominal Index:Smita Pansare vs State of Maharashtra, 2025 (LiveLaw) Bom 1Prameya Welfare Foundation vs. State Of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 2Shweta Tiwari vs State of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 3Amit Chavan vs State of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 4Jindal Cocoa LLP & ors. vs. Reserve Bank of India & ors., 2025...
Centre Notifies Transfer Of Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari From MP HC To Kerala High Court
The Central Government has notified the transfer of Justice Sushrut Arvind Dharmadhikari from Madhya Pradesh High Court to the Kerala High Court.The Supreme Court Collegium had recommended his transfer following the meetings held on 20th March 2025, 24th March 2025 and 03rd April 2025.Born on 8th July, 1966 at Raipur, Justice Dharmadhikari has an experience of 24 years as an Advocate in the...
'Love Deepens As We Grow Older': Kerala HC Grants Bail To 91-Yr-Old Man Accused Of Stabbing 88-Yr-Old Wife For Allegedly Suspecting He Had Illicit Affairs
The Kerala High Court granted bail to a 91-year-old man who was accused of attacking his 88-year-old wife with a knife, whereby she sustained serious injuries.Justice P. V. Kunhikrishnan observed that the 91-year-old should be allowed to live with his wife in his old age.The petitioner's version was that he stabbed his wife as she insulted him by saying that he had illicit relationships...
Substitution Of Arbitrator Can't Be Allowed When Petitioner Voluntarily Withdraws From Arbitral Proceedings: Calcutta High Court
The Calcutta High Court bench of Justice Shampa Sarkar has held that an application under Section 15 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act), seeking substitution of the arbitrator, cannot be allowed when the petitioner had voluntarily withdrawn from the arbitral proceedings and failed to participate despite being given ample opportunities, especially after a...
Calcutta High Court Orders Deployment Of Central Forces In Murshidabad After Anti-Waqf Bill Protests Turn Violent
In an urgent hearing on Saturday, the Calcutta High Court ordered the deployment of Central Forces in Bengal's Murshidabad after violence broke out during Anti-Waqf Bill protests, which reportedly led to multiple deaths.Chief Justice TS Sivagnanam constituted a special division bench constituted by Justices Soumen Sen and Raja Basu Chowdhury upon an urgent plea moved by BJP leader...
Mandate Of Arbitration U/S 29A Of Arbitration Act Can Be Extended By High Court Only When Arbitrator Is Appointed By It: Telangana High Court
The Telangana High Court bench of Justice Moushumi Bhattacharya and Justice B.R.Madhusudhan Rao has held that when an arbitrator is appointed by the High Court under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act) in a domestic arbitration, the mandate of the arbitrator can be extended by the High Court only under Section 29A of the Arbitration Act and not...
Writ Petition Cannot Be Construed As “Earlier Application” U/S 42 Of Arbitration & Conciliation Act: Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court Bench of Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri has observed that a writ petition cannot be construed as an "earlier application" under Section 42 of the Arbitration Act to decide jurisdiction as the very nature of a writ petition is to challenge an administrative action or a legal decision, not to initiate arbitration proceedings.Section 42 specifically refers to an "application...
Centre Notifies Appointment Of Justice Arun Palli As Chief Justice Of J&K And Ladakh High Court
The Central Government on Saturday (April 12) notified the appointment of Justice Arun Palli as Chief Justice of High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh. Union Law Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal took to 'X' regarding the appointment Justice Arun Palli. "In exercise of the power conferred by the Constitution of India, the Hon'ble President of India, after consultation with Hon'ble Chief Justice...
Withholding Tax Refunds Without Justification Violates Section 55 Of JVAT Act: Jharkhand High Court
The Jharkhand High Court has held that withholding tax refunds beyond the statutorily prescribed period without adequate justification, violates Section 55 of the Jharkhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005, and deprives the taxpayer of rightful dues. The Court ruled that the refund must carry interest from the date the excess demand was determined, and non-allocation of funds by the State...
Scheme Governing Auction Disputes Applies In All Auction Cases Unless Contrary Scheme Without Arbitration Clause Is Shown: Calcutta High Court
The Calcutta High Court bench Justice Shampa Sarkar has held that when a scheme generally applicable to all auction related disputes contains an arbitration clause, that clause will govern disputes arising between the parties, unless a contrary scheme without such a clause is shown. Brief Facts: Satya Narayan Shaw (petitioner) has filed this petition under section 11(6) of...
Delay Beyond Prescribed Period U/S 34(3) Of Arbitration Act Cannot Be Condoned In View Of Inapplicability Of S.5 Of Limitation Act: Himachal Pradesh HC
The Himachal Pradesh High Court bench of Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua has held that Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 (Limitation Act) does not apply to a petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act). Therefore, if the petition is not filed within the prescribed period as laid down under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration Act,...