[POCSO Act] Quashing Of Serious Offence To Efface Evidence Already Recorded Cannot Be Done Even At Instance Of Survivor: Kerala High Court

The Kerala High Court dismissed a petition filed by the victim of a POCSO offence to quash the proceedings saying that serious offences are involved and the trial had reached at the end stage.The Court noted that that the accused is alleged of committing serious offences like aggravated penetrative sexual assault against the minor. The accused was the father of the victim. He is accused to...

Karnataka High Court Monthly Digest: November 2024 [Citations: 454 - 489]

Citation 2024 LiveLaw (Kar) 454 to 2024 LiveLaw (Kar) 489Nominal Index: Mahantesh S Nagur AND State of Karnataka & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Kar) 454Siji Malayil & ANR And Union of India & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Kar) 455B. SATHYANARAYANACHAR AND State of Karnataka & Others. 2024 LiveLaw (Kar) 456Raja Yogi Nirmalnathji Maharaj AND KADRI JOGI (YOGISHWAR) MUTT & Others. 2024 LiveLaw...

Andhra Pradesh HC Grants Anticipatory Bail To Man Accused Of Organized Crime, Posting Allegedly Defamatory Content On CM Chandrababu Naidu

The Andhra Pradesh High Court granted anticipatory bail to a man booked for conducting organized crime and for posting allegedly defamatory content against Chief Minister N Chandrababu Naidu and Deputy Chief Minister Pawan Kalyan on social media which was claimed to have caused political disturbance and potential violence. Justice Harinath N in its order referred to Supreme Court's decision...

Form 26B Under Income Tax Rules Not Required For Refund Once Form 5 Under 'Vivad Se Vishwas' Act Is Issued: Allahabad High Court

The Allahabad High Court has held that an assesse claiming refund of excess TDS (tax deduction at source) is not required to fill Form 26B under the Income Tax Rules once Form 5 of the Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 has been issued to them. “A perusal of the Rules would reveal that Form 26B is required to filled up if the assessee claims refund paid under Chapter XXVII-B of the Act,...

Specific Exclusion Clause In Agreement Renders Dispute Non-Arbitrable: Punjab & Haryana High Court

The Punjab and Haryana High Court bench of Justice Jagmohan Bansal has held that when there is a specific exclusion clause in the agreement, the matter shall not be referred to Arbitration. Brief Facts The applicant filed this application under section 11 of the Arbitration Act, seeking appointment of the Arbitrator. The present application was filed on the basis of an...

16-Yrs Delay In Completing AIIMS Jodhpur Trauma Centre: Rajasthan HC Pulls Up State, Expresses Inclination To Impose ₹50 Crore Cost

The Jodhpur bench of the Rajasthan High Court pulled up the State Government for persistent delays in completion of “critical infrastructure projects” at AIIMS Jodhpur including a trauma centre and expressed its inclination to impose a cost of Rs. 50 crore as well as initiate action for criminal negligence against erring officials.The court however went on to grant one last opportunity to...

Appointment Of Managing Director/Chairman Of Party As Arbitrator Is Prohibited U/S 12(5) Of Arbitration Act: J&K High Court

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court bench of Chief Justice Tashi Rabstan has held that managing director or chairman of a party to the arbitration agreement cannot be appointed as Arbitrator in light of section 12(5) read with Seventh Schedule of the Arbitration Act. Brief Facts The petitioner has filed this application under section 11 of the Arbitration Act,...

Atul Subhash Suicide | Accused-Wife Moves Allahabad High Court Seeking Anticipatory Bail In Abetment To Suicide Case

The wife of 34-year-old Bangalore techie-Atul Subhash, along with three of her family members, has filed an anticipatory bail petition before the Allahabad High Court in connection with an FIR lodged against them concerning abetment to suicide case. Subhash, who allegedly died by suicide due to alleged harassment by his wife through the filing of matrimonial cases, left behind a...

Custody Orders Must Be Respected Unless Challenged And Modified By Higher Court: Jharkhand HC Directs Mother To Handover Son To Father

Highlighting that a custody order, unless challenged or modified by a higher court, must be respected, the Jharkhand High Court upheld a family court's order granting custody of a minor boy to his father. In doing so the high court further observed that there was nothing to suggest that the welfare of the minor was in any peril in the hands of the father. The Court interacted with the mother...

Reports Forming The Basis For Determining EPF Dues Must Be Shared With Parties: Kerala High Court

Kerala High Court: A single bench of Justice N. Nagresh overturned the orders of the Central Government Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court (CGIT) in two writ petitions filed by Sree Narayana Guru Memorial Educational & Cultural Trust. These orders demanded the Trust pay alleged EPF dues. The court ruled that repeated factual errors, procedural issues, and the lack of a fair...

Officer Entitled To Full Pay And Allowances If There Are No Reasons To Keep Him Suspended Till Conclusion Of Disciplinary Proceedings: Kerala HC

The Kerala High Court has held that an officer would be entitled to full pay and allowances if there were no reasons for keeping him under suspension till the conclusion of disciplinary proceedings.The Division Bench of Justice A.Muhamed Mustaque and Justice P. Krishna Kumar observed that disciplinary authority must apply their mind and exercise their discretion in deciding whether the...

Rajasthan High Court Monthly Digest: November 2024

Citations: 2024 LiveLaw (Raj) 328 To 2024 LiveLaw (Raj) 377NOMINAL INDEXJakir Khan v State of Rajasthan & Anr. 2024 LiveLaw (Raj) 328Hemlata Choudhary v the State of Rajasthan & Anr. 2024 LiveLaw (Raj) 329Smt. Suman Lata Kapur v the State of Rajasthan & Ors. 2024 LiveLaw (Raj) 330Anju Parihar v Looni Devi 2024 LiveLaw (Raj) 331Umesh Kumar & Anr. v Lila Bai & Anr. 2024...