All High Courts
Grills On Bus Windows, Ban On Employing Drivers With Speeding Challan: MP High Court Issues Guidelines For Safe Travel Of School Children
The Indore Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court while deciding a batch of public interest litigation pleas issued comprehensive guidelines to be followed for safety and and protection of children traveling in school buses until the State Government amends the Madhya Pradesh Motor Vehicles Rules, 1994.The guidelines includes that school buses will be painted in yellow, will have grills on...
Interpretation Of Contractual Stipulations Must Be Done To Give Full Effect To Arbitration Agreement: Rajasthan High Court
The Rajasthan High Court Bench of Justice Sudesh Bansal has held that it is a well-established principle of law if there is any contractual stipulation between the parties which under-mines the scope of the arbitration clause. Then, the same will be given an interpretation in the manner which gives full effect to the arbitration agreement between...
Summary Of SCN In GST DRC-01 Cannot Substitute Requirement For Issuance Of SCN U/S 73(1) Of CSGT Act: Gauhati High Court
The Gauhati High Court stated that issuance of summary of Show Cause Notice in GST DRC-01 cannot substitute requirement for issuance of show cause notice under section 73(1) of CSGT Act. The Bench of Justice Manish Choudhury observed that “…….the issuance of the Summary of the Show Cause Notice, Summary of the Statement and Summary of the Order do not dispense with the...
Appeal Cannot Be Dismissed As Not Maintainable On Account Of Non-Payment Of Requisite Fee: Punjab and Haryana High Court
The Punjab and Haryana High Court stated that appeal cannot be dismissed as not maintainable on account of non-payment of requisite fee. The Division Bench consisting of Justices Sanjeev Prakash Sharma and Sanjay Vashisth was considering a case where the Appellate Authority dismissed the appeal as not maintainable on the ground that the assessee/petitioner had failed to pay Rs....
Delisting Regulations Of SEBI Not Applicable To Delisting Of Equity Shares Under Resolution Plan: Bombay High Court
The Bombay High Court bench of Justices M.S.Sonak and Jitendra Jain has held that Delisting Regulations framed by the SEBI would not be applicable to the delisting of shares of the company in pursuance of the approval of a Resolution Plan under section 31 of the code. Brief Facts In this case, the petitioner challenges the vires of Regulation 3(2)(b)(i) of the SEBI...
Andhra Pradesh High Court Declines Stay On Govt Memo Permitting Mythri Movie Makers To Collect Higher Rate For Premiere Of Pushpa 2 Movie
A PIL has been initiated in the Andhra Pradesh High Court challenging the hiked rate of tickets for the movie Pushpa-2 that premiered on 4th of December.The Public interest litigation that was instituted by an aggrieved citizen S. Venkateshwarlu. Venkateshwarlu challenged not only the hiked rates but also challenged the movie being screened on all available slots and prayed that an inquiry...
Contraband Smuggled In By Drones From Pakistan, Masterminds Behind Illegal Trafficking Can't Be Granted Bail: Punjab & Haryana HC
The Punjab & Haryana High Court has refused to grant bail to a man accused of illicit trafficking of 50 grams of heroin, observing that "the quantity involved is categorized as "Intermediate Quantity" does not, by itself, bestow an automatic right to bail.Justice Sandeep Moudgil said, "merely because the quantity involved is categorized as "Intermediate Quantity" does not, by itself,...
Findings Of Calcutta HC Cannot Be Challenged Before Courts At Patna After Objections Over Jurisdiction Were Dismissed: Patna High Court
The Patna High Court Bench of Justice Sandeep Kumar has held that the findings of the Calcutta High Court cannot be challenged in the Courts at Patna. Additionally, the court noted that the respondent had first approached the Calcutta High Court by preferring an application under Section 9 of the Act. Therefore, the provisions of Section 42 of the Act would be attracted, and...
Shouldn't Everyone Else Have Darshan?: Kerala HC Enquires On Incident Involving 'VIP Darshan' Of Actor Dileep At Sabarimala
The Kerala High Court while hearing a suo motu matter dealing with the issue of VIP 'Darshan' of actor Dileep at Sabarimala questioned whether other pilgrims shouldn't also be entitled to darshan of the temple. In a report submitted by the Special Commissioner of Sabarimala and Additional District Magistrate Sabarimala, it was pointed out that the darshan of Dileep caused choking of queue in...
What Appears Obscene To Petitioner May Not Be To Majority Of Citizenry In Contemporary Times: Andhra Pradesh HC Dismisses PILs Against 'Bigg Boss Telugu'
On Friday, the Andhra Pradesh High Court dismissed two public interest litigation (PIL) pleas filed against the airing of the popular television show Bigg Boss Telugu 6, which renowned actor Nagarjuna hosts. A bench of Chief Justice Dhiraj Singh Thakur and Justice Ravi Cheemalapati emphasied that what might appear to be obscene and indecent to the petitioner may not be so to a majority...
Punjab & Haryana HC Sets Aside Non-Bailable Warrant Issued Against News Anchor Syed Sohail In POCSO Case
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has set aside the order of a trial court in Gurugram that cancelled the bail and issued a Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW) of arrest against TV News Anchors and Journalist Mohammad Sohail (working with Republic Bharat) in connection with a 2013 POCSO case for his non-appearance in court on one day. A bench of Justice Nidhi Gupta directed him to...
[Arbitration Act] S.2(1)(f) Is Non-Derogable, Applicability Cannot Be Excluded Even By Mutual Consent Of Parties: Delhi High Court
The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Neena Bansal Krishna has held that section 2(1)(f) of the Arbitration Act which defined the International Commercial Arbitration is a non derogable provision and its applicability cannot be excluded even by mutual consent of the parties. Brief Facts This petition has been filed under section 34 of the Arbitration Act against two awards passed...












![[Arbitration Act] S.2(1)(f) Is Non-Derogable, Applicability Cannot Be Excluded Even By Mutual Consent Of Parties: Delhi High Court [Arbitration Act] S.2(1)(f) Is Non-Derogable, Applicability Cannot Be Excluded Even By Mutual Consent Of Parties: Delhi High Court](https://www.livelaw.in/h-upload/2022/10/11/500x300_438661-justice-neena-bansal-krishna-and-delhi-hc.jpg)