Bombay High Court Monthly Digest – April 2025

2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 123 to 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 169Nominal Index:Accelerate Productx Ventures Pvt. Ltd. vs State of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 123Yash Charitable Trust vs. State Of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 124Lakhani's Blue Waves Co-operative Housing Society Ltd vs The Chairman, CIDCO, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 125Nathibai Damodar Thackersey Women's University Law School vs. State Of Maharashtra & Ors, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 126Ambit Urbanspace Versus Poddar Apartment Co-operative Housing Society Limited & Ors, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 127Shahbaz Mumtaz Khan vs. Indian Oil Corporation Limited & Ors., 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 128ST vs Commissioner, Municipal Corporation, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 129Anil Ambani vs Deputy Director of Income Tax, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 130Rohan Vishwas Kulkarni vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr., 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 131Santanu Sengupta & Ors. Versus Macrotech Developers Ltd., 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 132Samarth Constructions vs Pushpa Mate, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 133Urban Infrastructure Real Estate Fund Versus Neelkanth Realty Private Ltd. & Ors., 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 134 Anna Maruti Shinde vs State of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 135Bharat Ramji Thakkar vs Union Of India, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 136Arun Hastimal Firodia v. The State of Maharashtra and Another, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 137PV vs State of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 138Contract for Emergency Medical Services vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 139Harshvardhan Navnath Khandekar vs State Of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 140M/s. Mehta & Co. vs Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 141Nivritti Pandurang Nale vs. Uttam Ganu Nale & Anr, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 142Tanaji Shivaji Solankar & Ors vs. State of Maharashtra & Anr, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 143Central Depositories Services (India) Limited. Vs. Ketan Lalit Shah and Ors., 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 144Ballam Trifla Singh vs. Gyan Prakash Shukla & Ors., 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 145Prof Dr. Nikhil D. Datar vs. State Of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 146High Court of Judicature at Bombay on its own Motion vs. MCGM and Anr & Access to Hope vs. Brihanmumbai Electric Supply and Transport & Ors, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 147SJK Buildcon LLP vs. Kusum Pandurang Keni & Ors, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 148Bholashankar Ramsuresh Dubey Versus Dinesh Narayan Tiwari and Ors, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 149Brijesh Barot vs Registrar General, High Court, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 150Elite Housing LLP Versus The Spectrum CHS Ltd., 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 151Al-Quraish Human Welfare Association & Ors vs. The State Of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 152High Court On Its Own Motion vs Vineeta Srinandan, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 153Arun Hastimal Firodia v. The State of Maharashtra and Another, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 154Chetana Rajput v. Modern Education Society, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 155Technova Imaging Systems Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 156Sharmila Ghuge vs. University of Mumbai, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 157Tata Capital Limited v. Vijay Devij Aiya, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 158Tanveer Ahmed Patel vs State of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 159Cyril Ribeiro vs. State of Maharashtra and Ors, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 160Sheikh Ibrahim vs Sheikh Rehman, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 161IMAX Corporation v. E-City Entertainment (I) Pvt. Ltd. and Others, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 162Dr. V.N. Madhu vs. S.S. & L.S. Patkar-Varde College & ors, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 163Sahil Gilani vs State of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 164Indiabulls Infraestate Ltd. Versus Imagine Realty Pvt. Ltd., 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 165UTO Nederland B. V. & Anr. vs. Tilaknagar Industries Ltd, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 166Sabina Lakdawala vs Feroze Lakdawala, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 167Bramhanand Naikwadi vs State of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 168Abhijeet Bacche-Patil vs Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 169Judgments/Final Orders:'Concept Of 24x7 Convenience Shops Popular Worldwide': Bombay High Court Permits Retail Store In Pune To Operate For 24 HrsCase Title: Accelerate Productx Ventures Pvt. Ltd. vs State of MaharashtraCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 123While observing that the concept of '24x7' shops have become a popular one worldwide, the Bombay High Court permitted a convenience retail store in Pune to operate 24x7. The bench noted that State while recognising such advantages and to achieve progress commensurate with the global standards, has not imposed any kind of restrictions on the timings of such stores.State Rules Under Rights Of Persons With Disabilities Act Have Been Framed: State Govt Tells Bombay HCCase title: Yash Charitable Trust vs. State Of MaharashtraCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 124The Bombay High Court has disposed of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) seeking the enactment of State Rules under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. During the hearing, the State counsel submitted that the Maharashtra State Rights Of Persons With Disability Rules, 2024, were framed by the State government by exercising power under Section 101 of the 2016 Act.No...

Bombay High Court Monthly Digest – April 2025

Narsi Benwal

Tags