Bombay High Court Monthly Digest: January 2025 [Citations 01 - 43]

2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 1 to 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 43Nominal Index:Smita Pansare vs State of Maharashtra, 2025 (LiveLaw) Bom 1Prameya Welfare Foundation vs. State Of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 2Shweta Tiwari vs State of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 3Amit Chavan vs State of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 4Jindal Cocoa LLP & ors. vs. Reserve Bank of India & ors., 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 5Charushila Bira Shriram vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors., 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 6Dnyaneshwar Lingappa Bhosale vs. State of Maharashtra & ors., 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 7Vijay Sonkar and Others vs State of Maharashtra & Ors., 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 8Rona Wilson vs. State, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 9 XYZ vs State of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 10Sunil Modi vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 11Yushika Gedam vs Union of India, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 12Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai vs. Anusaya Sitaram Devrukhkar & Ors., 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 13Sanket More vs State of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 14Bharti Neeraj Chaourasiya vs. Indian Overseas Bank, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 15Amit Vyas vs. Union Of India, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 16Shreegopal Barasia Versus M/s. Creative Homes & Ors., 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 17MM vs State of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 19Rupali Ganguly vs Esha Verma, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 20Vaibhav Mawale vs State of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 21The Assistant Director, Directorate of Enforcement vs. The Branch Manager, The Goa State Co-op Bank Ltd., 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 22Health Care, Medical & General Stores Versus Amulya Investment,Through Proprietor Mr. Sameer G. Narvekar, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 23Hushad Neville Bacha vs Eric Girgol Vegas, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 24Rakesh Brijlal Jain vs State of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 25Shubhamkaroti Charitable Trust And Anr. vs. State Of Maharashtra And Ors, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 26Shravani Suryavanshi vs Union of India, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 27RD vs State of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 28Navneet Singh Gogia & anr. vs. State of Maharashtra & anr., 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 29Seawoods Estates Ltd. vs Union of India, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 30Jaago Nehru Nagar Residents Welfare Association vs Commissioner of Police, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 31Sabyasachi Nishank vs State of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 32Sukhshanti Co-operative Housing Society Ltd vs. Nishant M. Mahimtura & ors., 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 33An Advocate vs Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 34Balya @ Rahul Sahebrao Lokhande vs State of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 35Sri Sathe Infracon Private Limited v. M/s Rudranee Infrastructure Ltd. & another, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 36Nikhil Ranjwan vs State of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 37Asif Shaikh vs. State, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 38Sachin Prakashrao Andure vs. State, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 39Wonderchef Home Appliances Pvt. Ltd. vs Shree Swaminarayanan Pty Ltd., 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 40Court's on its own motion vs. State of Maharashtra Department of School Education, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 41Amit Dholakia vs State of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 42Avinash Benewal vs State of Maharashtra, 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 43Judgments/Final Orders:Will Not Monitor Trial In Govind Pansare Murder Case: Says Bombay High Court, Orders Daily Hearing In The MatterCase Title: Smita Pansare vs State of Maharashtra Citation: 2025 (LiveLaw) Bom 1The Bombay High Court on Thursday (January 2) said it will not continue to monitor the trial in the murder case of communist party of India (CPI) leader Govind Pansare, who was allegedly shot down by right-wing extremists in August 2013.A division bench of Justices Ajay Gadkari and Kamal Khata while disposing of an application moved by prime accused Virendra Tawade, said the only aspect which is being investigated as on date is the whereabouts of the absconding accused in the case.Take Steps To Ensure Eligible Women Receive Benefits Under Altered Ladki Bahin Scheme: Bombay High Court To StateCase title: Prameya Welfare Foundation vs. State Of Maharashtra Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 2While disposing of a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) that sought the implementation 'Mukhyamantri Majhi Ladki Bahin Yojana' for all eligible women in the State, the Bombay High Court has observed that the State must take the necessary steps to ensure that all the eligible women are entitled to the benefits of the altered scheme.Mumbai Police Shuts Forgery Case Against Actor Shweta Tiwari, Bombay High Court Permits Her To Withdraw Plea To Quash FIRCase Title: Shweta Tiwari vs State of Maharashtra Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Bom) 3The Mumbai Police last month informed the Bombay High Court that it has shut the 'forgery' case against TV actor Shweta Tiwari, lodged by her estranged husband Abhinav Kohli in 2021.A division bench of Justices Sarang Kotwal and Dr Neela Gokhale permitted Tiwari to withdraw her writ petition before the High Court, by virtue of which the silver screen actor had sought to quash the First Information Report (FIR) lodged against her by Kohli.Following A Girl Only Once Will Not Amount To...

Bombay High Court Monthly Digest: January 2025 [Citations 01 - 43]

Sanjana Dadmi

Tags