Bombay High Court Monthly Digest: September 2024

Bombay High Court Monthly Digest: September 2024Nominal Index (2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 461 to 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 498): Mohan Chavan vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 461Abhin Anilkumar Shah versus ITO, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 462Nitin Vasantrao Bode vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 463Tejasvee Abhishek Ghosalkar vs State Of Maharashtra And Ors, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 464Vijay Sapkale vs Varsha Pradhan, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 465Sete Mares Global Forex Private Limited v. Union of India, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 466Mahesh Motiram Kumbhar vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 467Nandkishor Sahu vs Sanjeevani Patil, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 468Miss XYZ vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 469Dilkhush Shrigiriwar vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 470Narsingrao Udgirkar vs Shivaji Kalge, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 471Rahul Lahase vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 472L vs State of Goa, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 473Uttam Value Steels Ltd. versus Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax and Ors, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 474Mitesh Punmiya vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 475Ramesh Gopnur vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 476Syed Naeemuddin & ors. vs. The State of Maharashtra & anr., 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 477The State of Goa thr. Women Police Station, Panaji vs. M, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 478Dr Sushant Jadhav vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 479Santosh Rodrigues vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 480Kunal Kamra vs Union of India, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 481Public Service Commission Through Its Secretary Versus The State Of Maharashtra Through The Secretary And Others, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 482Dr Prashant Ahire vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 483Munib Iqbal Memon vs. State, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 484Santosh Madhukar Bhondve & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors., 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 485Volvo Group India Pvt Ltd. versus Union of India and Ors, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 486Uttam Value Steels Ltd. Vs Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 487Namdeo Bansode vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 488Mahesh Raut vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 489HDFC Bank Limited & Ors. vs. State of Maharashtra & Ors., 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 490Shahid Akeel Shaikh vs. Union of India & ors., 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 491Dnyaneshwar Wakale vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 492Vijay Jawanjal vs State of Maharashtra, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 493Industrial Development Bank of India versus DCIT, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 494Arshad Khalifa vs Gulzar Khalifa, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 495Principal Commissioner of Income Tax vs. Galaxy Surfactants, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 496Y-Not Films LLP and Anr. vs. Ultra Media and Entertainment Pvt. Ltd., 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 497Sudhir Kumar Sengupta vs. Kusum Pandurang Keni, 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 498Judgments/Final Orders: Uddhav Thackeray Did Not Hurt Religious Sentiments, Plea Filed For Publicity: Bombay High Court Orders Man To Pay Rs 2 Lakhs To Former CMCase Title: Mohan Chavan vs State of MaharashtraCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 461The Aurangabad Bench of the Bombay High Court, recently held that Maharashtra's former Chief Minister and the President of the divided Shiv Sena - Uddhav Thackeray did not hurt religious sentiments by not applying the sacred ash on his forehead, presented to him by a Mahant (Priest) during a public event in Nanded.Single-judge Justice Sanjay Mehare also imposed a cost of Rs 2 lakhs on the petitioner - Mohan Chavan and has clearly told him to pay the said hefty amount to Thakceray, via a Demand Draft (DD).Central Charges & International Taxation Charges Are Not Excluded From Purview Of Faceless Mechanism U/s 144B R/w/s 151A: Bombay High CourtCase Title: Abhin Anilkumar Shah versus ITOCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 462The Bombay High Court held that the faceless mechanism would be applicable to all cases of Central Charges and International Taxation charges. However, the High Court clarified that it is only the assessment proceedings which would be required to be undertaken outside the faceless mechanism.The Division Bench of G. S. Kulkarni and Somasekhar Sundaresan observed that “mandatory faceless procedure for issuance of notice u/s 148 falling within the purview of the scheme notified by the Central Government dated 29 March, 2022 would not exclude the Central charges and international taxation charges from the application of the faceless mechanism as notified u/s 144B read with section 151A of the Act”."No Intention To Disrupt Public Peace": Bombay High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail To Man Booked For Promoting NaxalismCase Title: Nitin Vasantrao Bode vs State of MaharashtraCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Bom) 463The Bombay High Court bench at Nagpur recently granted anticipatory bail to a man booked for supporting and promoting 'Naxalism' through his WhatsApp messages and 'instigating' people against the existing Government of India by calling upon people to 'revive Naxalism' in the country.Single-judge Justice Urmila Joshi-Phalke on August 2, noted that the...

Bombay High Court Monthly Digest: September 2024

Sanjana Dadmi

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Bombay High Court Monthly Digest: September 2024

Sanjana Dadmi

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers