State Can't Fix Admission Quota In Unaided Minority Institutions: Chattisgarh HC Declares Rule Fixing 50% Domicile Quota As Ultra-Vires

Holding that the State cannot fix quota or percentage of admission in unaided minority educational institutions, the Chhattisgarh High Court declared the Rule 4(1)(d)(i) of the Chhattisgarh Ayush Graduate Course Admission Rules, 2023 as ultra-vires and unconstitutional.A division bench of Chief Justice Ramesh Sinha and Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal held so while hearing a writ petition filed by the Jain Community's unaided minority educational institutions which had assailed the 2023 Admission Rules as unconstitutional arguing that it empowered the State Government to fix quota for state-domiciled students in the petitioner's unaided minority educational institution. The plea had further sought a direction to the respondents authorities to permit the petitioner No.1–Mahaveer College of Ayurvedic Science Village to admit all India students in Bachelor of Aayurvedik Medicine and Surgery (BAMS)"In view of the above discussion and the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.A. Inamdar's case (supra) and also the order passed in Dr. Aditi Jain's case (supra) by coordinate Bench of this Court, we are also of the opinion that the State cannot fix quota in unaided private professional institution between the Management and the State. Therefore, we deem it appropriate to declare sub-clause (i) of clause (d) of sub-rule (1) of rule 4 of C.G. Ayush Graduate Course Admission Rules, 2023 as ultra vires and hold that the State cannot fix quota or percentage of admission in unaided minority educational institutions. For the foregoing reasons the petition is allowed and the provision of subclause (i) of clause (d) of sub-rule (1) of Rule 4 of the C.G. Ayush Graduate Course Admission Rules, 2023 is declared as ultra vires," the bench directed.Holding the rule as ultra vires, the bench thereafter directed the State Government to issue "necessary instructions" with respect to admission in BAMS course in unaided minority institution.BackgroundFor context, prior to the enforcement of the 2023 Admission Rules, the Chhattisgarh Ayush Graduation Course Admission Rules, 2019 was applicable wherein no such quota has been fixed either in dental or medical minority institutions, but only in the minority institutions imparting education in Ayush courses this quota had been fixed. The plea stated that the State has no right to fix the quota of the weaker society in the minority institutions under the Right of Children to Free and Compulsory Education Act, 2009.Consequently, the Admission Rules, 2023 were brought into force from September 6, 2023 wherein under Rule 4(1)(a), the said quota was fixed at 85% of the total seats and as per rule 4(1)(d)(i) out of this 85%, 50% seats were to be filled up by the local minority students, i.e., from Jain community of the state and the remaining 50% from general merit list prepared for the state from which counseling is to be conducted.ContentionsRelying on the Supreme Court's decision in TMA Pai Foundation and others Vs. State of Karnataka and others (2002), the petitioner institutions contended that the State cannot impose a 50% quota on the petitioner's unaided minority educational institution to mandatorily in-take students of the general merit lists prepared for the State. It added that there can be no fixation of government seats in the minority institutions and the State has no right to nominate any student or to fix any quota in unaided professional colleges. It said that that the State cannot restrict the minority institutions to give admission of 50% State quota seats to the students who are domicile of Chhattisgarh. The petitioner contended that Rule 4(1)(d)(i) is illegal and unconstitutional and violative of Article 30(1) of the Constitution of India and in unaided minority institution the State cannot fix State quota seats for granting admission to students. On the other hand the Respondent State argued that being a welfare State, the Chattisgarh Government had the legislative competence to make rules in order to provide reservation in admission of students belonging to Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribes and Other Backward Class in educational institutions and so the state government had framed the 2023 Admission Rules. It said that while Article 30 of the Constitution includes the right of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions, but there should be regulatory measures to ensure educational standards to maintain the guidelines of minority educational institutions and the procedure and method of admission in the said institutions. It said that the admission in such colleges should not be only for the purpose to make profits, but also to ensure that the same would be benefited for the people at large. It argued that the State "in no manner" has restricted the petitioner institution to carry on its admission process, but it has exercised its right to give admission to the students of the State of Chattisgarh and in this regard rules ...

State Can't Fix Admission Quota In Unaided Minority Institutions: Chattisgarh HC Declares Rule Fixing 50% Domicile Quota As Ultra-Vires

Yash Mittal

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Yash Mittal

State Can't Fix Admission Quota In Unaided Minority Institutions: Chattisgarh HC Declares Rule Fixing 50% Domicile Quota As Ultra-Vires

Yash Mittal

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Yash Mittal

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers