Post-Wise Identification Within 1% Reservation For Visually Impaired Candidates (Low Vision & Blind) Is Valid For Safety Reasons : Delhi HC

A division bench of the Delhi High Court comprising Justice C. Hari Shankar and Justice Ajay Digpaul held that identification of posts suitable only for low vision within the 1% reservation for visually impaired is valid, as post-wise identification within reserved vacancies based on the nature of duties and safety requirements is permissible, and blind candidates cannot claim posts...

Delhi High Court Lists YouTuber Mohak Mangal's Plea To Transfer ANI's Copyright Suit Before IP Division

The Delhi High Court on Monday listed before a coordinate bench of the intellectual property (IP) division YouTuber Mohak Mangal's plea seeking transfer of the copyright and trademark infringement suit filed by Asian News International (ANI) against him before city's Patiala House Court to the High Court.Justice Anup Jairam Bhambhani listed the matter before a coordinate bench on Friday,...

Six New Judges Sworn In At Delhi High Court, Strength Rises To 40

Six new judges were sworn in at the Delhi High Court today.The new judges are:- Justice V Kameswar Rao- Justice Nitin Wasudeo Sambre- Justice Vivek Chaudhary- Justice Anil Kshertarpal- Justice Arun Monga- Justice Ok Prakash ShuklaWith their swearing-in, the high court's strength has gone to 40. The sanctioned strengthen of judges is 60. Their transfer was notified by the Central Government...

[Insurance Act] Surveyors Work Impartially & Independently, Cannot Be Branded 'Puppets' Of Insurance Company: Delhi HC

The Delhi High Court has observed that persons assessing the extent of loss in an accident to determine the amount payable by an insurance company to the policyholder cannot be branded as the company's “puppet”.Justice Manoj Jain observed, “They work impartially and independently and, such surveyors and loss-assessors, are mandated to comply with code of conduct in respect of their...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: July 14 To July 20, 2025

Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 784 to 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 825NOMINAL INDEXBaba Global Ltd v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 29 & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 784TATA SONS PRIVATE LIMITED AND ANR v. JOHN DOE AND 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 785UMESH VERMA v. STATE 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 786Kroll Information Assurance LLC v. The Controller General Of Patents, Designs And Trademarks And Ors...

Patent Infringement: Delhi High Court Restrains Zydus From Manufacturing Biologic Similar To 'Nivolumab' Cancer Drug

The Delhi High Court has restrained Zydus Lifesciences Limited from manufacturing, selling importing, exporting or dealing in any biologic which is similar to Nivolumab, a drug used to treat cancer, sold under the brand name “Opdivo.”Justice Mini Pushkarna passed the interim order in favour of Nivolumab's manufacturer company- E.R. Squibb and Sons LLC, in its patent infringement suit...

Monthly Rent Payment Cannot Be Accepted As Instalments Towards Sale Consideration Of Property: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has made it clear that monthly payment of rent made under a registered lease deed cannot be construed as instalments towards the sale consideration of a property.Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora thus rejected a suit filed seeking title over the suit property on the strength of an agreement to sell, a customary sale deed and the alleged monthly instalments.The...

Writ Jurisdiction Cannot Be Invoked When Party Has Already Approached DRT Under SARFAESI Act: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has dismissed a petition while upholding that if a borrower has already approached the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) under the SARFAESI Act, for a one-time settlement, a writ seeking the same relief under Article 226 of the Constitution is not maintainable. Background of the Case The petitioner has availed the credit facilities from the consortium of...

Mere Threats Without Intention To Cause Alarm Not Criminal Intimidation: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has observed that mere threats given by the accused, without an intention to cause alarm, would not constitute an offence of criminal intimidation.“A bare perusal of Section 506 IPC makes it clear that before an offence of criminal intimidation is made out, it must be established that an accused had an intention to cause alarm to the Prosecutrix. Mere threats given by...

Confinement In A Room Sufficient To Frame 'Wrongful Confinement' Charge, Tying Of Victim's Hands Not Necessary: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court has observed that confinement within a room is sufficient to make out a prima facie case for framing charge for the offence of wrongful confinement.Justice Girish Kathpalia set aside the discharge of two men accused of beating and confining a woman in their house. The Court allowed the Delhi Police's plea challenging the trial court order discharging the two men for...

[S.53A CrPC] Almost Mandatory To Take Blood Samples For DNA Analysis In Rape Cases, Police Can Use Force If Needed: Delhi High Court

Stating that DNA testing is an “almost perfect science” to determine truthfulness of the allegations of rape, the Delhi High Court has held that Police is duty bound to take accused's blood sample for analysis in such cases.Justice Neena Bansal Krishna observed,“Section 53A Cr.P.C. has been introduced making it almost compulsory in rape cases, to conduct the blood test including the...

Arbitration Can't Be Restricted To Specific Respondents When Agreements Form Part Of Single Commercial Transaction: Delhi High Court

The Delhi High Court bench of Justices Subramonium Prasad and Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar held that when an application under Section 8 of the Arbitration Act is filed in opposition to a civil suit, a party cannot later object that the arbitration was intended to apply only to specific respondents, especially when the pleadings indicate that the agreements formed part of a single...