Delhi High Court Annual Digest 2024: Part IV [Citations 1201 - 1394]

Citations 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1201 to 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1394Delhi High Court Restrains 'Rogue App' From Streaming Star's ContentsCase title: Star India Private Limited vs. Tajkir Mohammad Tanvir (King's Pro+) And Ors.Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1201In relation to a copyright suit filed by Star Channels, the Delhi High Court has restrained a 'rogue app' and related websites from streaming, reproducing and making the contents of Star Channels available to the public.Insisting Presence Of MD/CEO Merely For Disposing Traffic Challans On Vehicle Registered In Company Name Uncalled For: Delhi High CourtCase title: Benetton India Private Limited vs. State NCT of DelhiCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1202The Delhi High Court has observed that a Trial Court's direction requiring the physical presence of a company's MD/CEO emrely for the purpose of disposing traffic challans was irrational. Delhi High Court Restrains Alpino Health Foods From Publishing Advertisements 'Disparaging' OatsTitle: MARICO LIMITED v. ALPINO HEALTH FOODS PRIVATE LIMITEDCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1203The Delhi High Court has recently restrained Alpino Health Foods Private Limited, a Bengaluru-based brand, from publishing or sharing its advertisements disparaging “Oats” as a category of foods, either on social media or otherwise.Delhi High Court Rejects PIL To Allow Chhath Puja Celebration At Yamuna After Govt Flags River's Pollution LevelCase Title: Purvanchal Nav Nirman Sansthan v. GNCTDCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1204The Delhi High Court has dismissed a public interest litigation seeking to allow the public to perform the festival of Chhath Puja at Geeta Colony Ghats on the Yamuna riverbed in the national capital. Challenge To Award U/S 34 Of Arbitration Act Without Award Itself Being Filed Would Not Be A Valid Filing: Delhi High CourtCase Title: VASISHTA MANTENA NH04 JV & ORS. V. BLACKLEAD INFRATECH PVT LTD.Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1205The Delhi High Court Bench of Justice Subramonium Prasad, held that a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act is for challenging the Award. It cannot be said that a challenge to the Award without the award itself being filed would be a valid filing. Without the Award, the challenge would become meaningless because unless the Award is perused by the Court, it cannot test or adjudicate on the correctness of the Award.No Basis For Reassessment If Nature & Source Of Receipts Are Verified, AO Doesn't Find Any Contradictory Evidence: Delhi High CourtCase Title: Experion Hospitality Pvt. Ltd. v. Income Tax Officer & Ors.Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1206The Delhi High Court stated that once nature and source of receipts have been satisfactorily proved and AO has not contradicted information given by assessee, there lies no cause for initiating the reassessment action.'No Infirmity In The Decision To Direct Payment Of Interest On Interest', Delhi High Court Upholds Decision Of Central Administrative TribunalCase Title: GOVT OF NCT DELHI AND ORS. versus SURENDRA SINGHCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1207A division Bench of the Delhi High Court comprising Justices C Hari Shankar and Sudhir Kumar Jain dismissed a Petition that sought to quash the judgement of the Central Administrative Tribunal directing the Petitioners to pay the Respondent the interest on interest at the rate of 10 percent. The Court held that the proscription on interest on interest as per Section 3(3)(c) of the Interest Act would not apply as the direction by the Tribunal was not made under Section 3 of the Interest Act.Delhi High Court Sentences Lawyer To 4 Months In Jail For Making Derogatory Remarks, Filing Frivolous Complaints Against JudgesTitle: COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. SANJEEV KUMARCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1208The Delhi High Court has sentenced a lawyer to four months in jail after finding him guilty of criminal contempt for making derogatory remarks against judges and filing repeatedly frivolous complaints against them as well as the police officers.Delhi High Court Says Notification Banning Import Of Salman Rushdie's 'The Satanic Verses' Doesn't Exist As Authorities Fail To Trace ItTitle: SANDIPAN KHAN v. THE CHAIRMAN, CENTRAL BOARD OF INDIRECT TAXES AND CUSTOMS AND ORS.Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1209The Delhi High Court has disposed of a petition challenging the notification purportedly issued by the custom authorities in 1988 banning the import of book “The Satanic Verses” authored by Indian-British novelist Salman Rushdie.Delhi High Court Protects Dream 11's Trademark From Unknown Entities, Awards ₹1 Lakh CostCase title: Sporta Technologies Pvt Ltd And Anr. vs. John Doe And Ors.Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 1210The Delhi High Court has restrained unknown defendants from infringing the registered trademarks of online fantasy sports league platform 'Dream11' including its domain names or content on its websites.Delhi High Court Fines Advocate 10K For 'Outrageous Aspersions' On Judge, Alleging 'Scam In Govt...

Delhi High Court Annual Digest 2024: Part IV [Citations 1201 - 1394]

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags