Delhi High Court Restrains Rupa, Young Global & Professional Books From Selling 'Coat-Pocket' Constitution Edition 'Deceptively' Similar To EBC's

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

30 Sept 2025 6:10 PM IST

  • Delhi High Court Restrains Rupa, Young Global & Professional Books From Selling Coat-Pocket Constitution Edition Deceptively Similar To EBCs

    The Delhi High Court has restrained Rupa Publications, Professional Book Publishers and Young Global Publications from publishing or selling their 'coat pocket' edition of the Constitution of India bare act, in a trademark infringement suit filed by the Eastern Book Company (EBC).Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora found the abovenamed publications' editions' trade dress to be deceptively...

    The Delhi High Court has restrained Rupa Publications, Professional Book Publishers and Young Global Publications from publishing or selling their 'coat pocket' edition of the Constitution of India bare act, in a trademark infringement suit filed by the Eastern Book Company (EBC).

    Justice Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora found the abovenamed publications' editions' trade dress to be deceptively similar to EBC's 'iconic' red and black style coat-pocket edition launched back in 2009.

    "The defendant has adopted a similar colour scheme, text and font, gilt edging, book posteen colour, and embossed gold detailing. Considering, that the plaintiffs and the defendant operate in the same line of business, utilize identical trade channels, and cater to the same class of customers, there exists a strong likelihood of confusion,” said the bench in three different but similar orders against each of the defendants.

    EBC had moved the High Court against the respondents alleging that its coat-pocket editions feature a distinctive trade dress, including a signature 'black-red' colour combination, with a specific font style, gold leafing and overall trade dress, on thin bible paper.

    The phrase 'coat pocket' has been deliberately coined as the size of these bare acts makes them comparatively portable for carrying over the traditional versions, it said.

    However, in November 2024, EBC discovered that Rupa Publications and others were also publishing and selling a coat-pocket version of the Constitution bare act, with “striking similarity”.

    It was alleged that the defendant imitated the essential features of the trade dress being used by EBC, including the color scheme, title placement, font type and gold leafing, which thereby showcases the defendant's malafide intention to ride upon the plaintiffs' goodwill and reputation.

    In case of Rupa, it was submitted that the trade dress imitation was also evident from the defendant's decision to part away with its popular Red-white colour scheme logo which is consistently used for all its publications and generally placed on the top-right corner/bottom centre; however in its impugned coat-pocket editions the defendant is using a golden logo, which is located at the bottom-right corner.

    On comparison of the all three coatpocket editions, the Court said it is prima facie evident that the impugned trade dress/design is deceptively similar to the trade dress adopted by EBC.

    “Defendant has entirely copied the layout of the plaintiff's product without any independent creativity. To an unwary consumer of average intelligence and imperfect recollection, the trade dress of the defendant's impugned coat-pocket editions is likely to appear identical to that of the plaintiffs' coat-pocket editions. Such a similarity is likely to mislead consumers regarding the source or origin of the said products,” it said in Rupa's order.

    Reliance was placed on Colgate Palmolive Company & Another v. Anchor Health and Beauty Care Pvt. Ltd. (2023) , wherein the court opined that while no party can claim a monopoly over a single colour, a distinctive colour combination, when consistently used over time, can create customer recognition and goodwill…and substantial reproduction of such combinations in a similar order on packaging can cause confusion and dilute distinctiveness.

    As such, the Court directed Rupa Publications and two other publications to recall all their unsold inventory of the impugned coat-pocket edition.

    The main suit is listed for hearing on February 25, next year.

    Appearance: Mr. Jayant Mehta, Sr. Advocate and Ms. Swati Sukumar, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Raghavendra Mohan Bajaj, Ms. Garima Bajaj, Mr. Shagun Agarwal, Mr. Zeephan Ahmed and Mr. Ritik Raghuvanshi, Advocates [For EBC in suit concerning Rupa Publications

    Raj Shekhar Rao, Sr. Advocate and Mr. J. Sai Deepak, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Raghavendra Mohan Bajaj, Ms. Garima Bajaj, Mr. Kumar Karan and Mr. Sajal Awasthi, Advocates [For EBC in suit concerning Professional Book Publishers]

    Abhishek Malhotra, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Raghavendra Mohan Bajaj, Ms. Garima Bajaj, Mr. Kanav Agarwal, Mr. Kartikay Dutta and Ms. Anukriti Trivedi, Advocates [For EBC in suit concerning Young Global Publications]

    Case title: EBC Publishing (P) Ltd & Anr v. Rupa Publications India Private Limited and related matters

    Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1229

    Click here to read order (Rupa)

    Click here to read order (Professional Book Publishers)

    Click here to read order (Young Global Publications)

    Next Story