Delhi High Court Upholds Single Judge Direction Asking Wikipedia To Remove 'Defamatory' Content On ANI

The Delhi High Court on Tuesday upheld a single judge direction asking Wikimedia Foundation, which hosts Wikipedia platform, to take down allegedly defamatory content and description of news agency ANI Media Private Limited.A division bench comprising Justice Prathiba M Singh and Justice Rajneesh Kumar Gupta however stayed the direction on Wikipedia to remove the protection status imposed on the ANI page.It further stayed the direction seeking to restrain the platform's users and administrators from publishing anything defamatory against the news agency.Senior Advocate Akhil Sibal appeared for Wikipedia. Advocate Siddhant Kumar appeared for ANI.The division bench observed that the single judge had given detailed reasoning as to the defamatory nature of the impugned content and legal position of defamation suit.“This court is of the opinion that until the appeal is finally heard, the relief granted is restricted to the first part of prayer b of the injunction. The remaining injunction of prayer c and later part of prayer b is stayed,” the division bench ordered.Furthermore, it ordered that whenever ANI writes an email to Wikipedia regarding any further allegedly defamatory content on its page, Wikipedia would be liable to follow the IT Rules and if such a content is not taken down within 36 hours, ANI can approach the Court by filing a fresh application.“During the pendency of the suit it is seen that the content on wikipedia page is not static. The nature of the platform itself is such that content is continuously dynamic. There is possibility that content could be changing on a daily basis. The injunction would operate in a manner that platform would take down whatever content would be violative of the injunction. If any other content comes to notice of plaintiff, same shall be brought to notice of platform through counsel,” the Court said.The Bench also said that Wikipedia is nothing but an online encyclopedia and in cases of such online encyclopaedias, the intention of the publisher ought to be to take a neutral stance. “The clear stand of wikipedia is that it is an intermediary. Wikipedia stand is also buttressed by further pleading that other defendants (administrator in the suit) are independent third party volunteers who have contributed on ANI wikipedia page. Since wikipedia claims to be intermediary, in terms of IT Rules, the intermediary has a obligation to make efforts not to publish any objectionable content,” the Court said.It added that if there is any content on wikipedia website which a person whose information it professes to publish is false and untrue, on receipt of court order, within 36 hours, the intermediary is obliged to take down the said content. The single judge heard the parties and had given a prima facie opinion that content is defamatory, the Bench noted.Wikipedia filed the appeal challenging the single judge order passed on April 02 directing it to remove allegedly defamatory statements published against ANI on its Wikipedia page titled “Asian News International.”The single judge had observed that Wikipedia cannot wash its hands of the contents published on it by merely claiming that it is an intermediary and cannot be held responsible for the statements published on the platform.Perusing ANI's Wikipedia page, the Court had said that the statements on it were all sourced from articles which were nothing but editorials and opinionated pages.Before the single judge, ANI had filed Rs. 2 crore defamation suit against Wikimedia Foundation.Wikipedia's page said ANI "has been criticized for having served as a propaganda tool for the incumbent central government, distributing materials from a vast network of fake news websites, and misreporting events.”In its suit against Wikimedia Foundation and its officials, ANI had said that the former has allegedly published palpably false and defamatory content with malicious intent of tarnishing the news agency's reputation and to discredit its goodwill.In August last year, Wikipedia was directed by the Court to disclose to ANI the subscriber details of the three individuals available with it within two weeks.Wikipedia challenged the said order before the division bench which took exception to a dedicated page the platform on the pending defamation proceedings.The Wikipedia page in question was titled “Asian News International vs. Wikimedia Foundation.” It read “The judge in the case has threatened to order the government of India to shut down Wikipedia in the country.”Later, the division bench had ordered take down of the page in question, noting that adverse comments were made against the single judge on the page which was prima facie contemptuous.Wikipedia's appeal was disposed of after both the parties entered into a consent order and resolved the matter. The division bench had then asked the single judge to proceed ahead with the defamation suit.In November, Justice Prasad had issued summons to three individuals who allegedly edited the...

Delhi High Court Upholds Single Judge Direction Asking Wikipedia To Remove 'Defamatory' Content On ANI

Nupur Thapliyal

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Nupur Thapliyal

Delhi High Court Upholds Single Judge Direction Asking Wikipedia To Remove 'Defamatory' Content On ANI

Nupur Thapliyal

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Nupur Thapliyal

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers