Delhi High Court Weekly Round Up: April 08 To April 14, 2024

Citations 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 418 to 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 450NOMINAL INDEXHarish Chandra T & Ors v. ICAI 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 418Canara Bank Versus Assistant Commissioner, DGST 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 419Agra Portfolio Pvt. Ltd. Versus Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 420DILIP RAY v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 421M/S. P.M. DIESELS P. LTD v. M/S. THUKRAL MECHANICAL WORKS & ORS. and other connected matters 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 422MyPreferred Transformation & Hospitality v. Faridabad Implements Pvt Ltd 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 423ARVIND KEJRIWAL v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 424M/S. Giesecke And Devrient India Pvt. Ltd.Versus DCIT 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 425Prince Chadha v. Amardeep Singh 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 426COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 427STCI Finance Ltd v. Sukhmani Technologies Pvt Ltd 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 428 KAIRA DISTRICT COOPERATIVE MILK PRODUCERS UNION LTD & ANR. v. D N BAHRI TRADING AS THE VELDON CHEMICAL AND FOOD PRODUCT & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 429ANKITA SINGH v. VICE CHANCELLOR OF JAWAHARLAL NEHRU UNIVERSITY AND ORS 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 430G4S Secure Solutions v. Matrix Cellular (International) Services Ltd 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 431NHAI v. M/s IRB Ahmedabad Vadodra Super Express Tollways 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 432Sandeep Kumar v. Arvind Kejriwal and Others 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 433ASHA RANI v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 434PUMA SE v. ASHOK KUMAR TRADING AS R.K. INDUSTRIES 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 435Saksham Commodities Limited Versus Income Tax Officer 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 436GULSHAN KUMAR & ANR. v. NIDHI KASHYAP 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 437LOKESH KUMAR v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 438Anju Jain v. M/s WTC Noida Development Company Pvt Ltd 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 439BHAVREEN KANDHARI v. MANDEEP MITTAL 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 440TATA SONS PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S TATA RESTART & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 441Court on its own motion v. Union of India and other connected matters 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 442T.V. Today Network Ltd Vs Home And Soul Pvt. Ltd. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 443PCIT Versus Pankaj Buildwell Ltd. & Group 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 444EHTESHAM QUTUBUDDIN SIDDIQUI v. CPIO ASSISTANT DIRECTOR 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 445Fresenius Medical Care India Private Limited Versus UOI 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 446Pace Setters Business Solutions Pvt. Ltd. Versus Union Of India And Ors. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 447 Viduthalai Chiruthaigal Katchi v. ECI 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 448DOMINOS IP HOLDER LLC & ANR v. MS DOMINO PIZZA & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 449North East Centre of Technology Application & Reach v. Divine Bamboo Mat Manufacturing 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 450Delhi High Court Dismisses Plea To Postpone CA Inter, Final Exams Amid Lok Sabha PollsTitle: Harish Chandra T & Ors v. ICAICitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 418The Delhi High Court has refused to postpone the Chartered Accountants (CA) inter and final exams 2024 which are scheduled to be held in May.Justice C Hari Shankar dismissed the plea moved by 27 candidates seeking postponement of exams from May to June in view of the Lok Sabha elections.Proper Officer Has To Consider Reply On Merits And Then Form An Opinion: Delhi High CourtCase Title: Canara Bank Versus Assistant Commissioner, DGSTCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 419The Delhi High Court has held that the proper officer has to consider the reply on merits and then form an opinion.The bench of Justice Sanjeev Sachdeva and Justice Ravinder Dudeja has observed that the proper officer merely held that the reply is incomplete, not clear, and unsatisfactory, which ex-facie shows that the proper officer has not applied his mind to the reply submitted by the petitioner.Delhi High Court Interprets Rule 11UA For Determination FMV Of Shares U/S 56(2)(viib)Case Title: Agra Portfolio Pvt. Ltd. Versus Pr. Commissioner Of Income TaxCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 420The Delhi High Court has held that it has interpreted Rule 11UA of the Income Tax Rules, 1962, for determining the fair market value (FMV) of shares under Section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.The bench of Justice Yashwant Varma and Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav has observed that Section 56(2)(viib) postulates that the FMV of shares shall be the value determined in accordance with the methods as may be prescribed or as may be substantiated by the company to the satisfaction of the AO, whichever is higher. Coal Scam: Delhi High Court Stays Conviction Of Former Union Minister Dilip Ray To Enable Him To Contest ElectionsTitle: DILIP RAY v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATIONCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 421The Delhi High Court has stayed the conviction of former Union Minister Dilip Ray in connection with a coal scam case relating to irregularities in the allocation of a Jharkhand block in 1999, to enable him to contest the upcoming Odisha legislative assembly polls.Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma clarified that the relief does not amount to an acquittal but is merely a suspension of conviction in peculiar...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round Up: April 08 To April 14, 2024

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags