Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: August 14 To August 20, 2023

Citations 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 682 to 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 713NOMINAL INDEXOxfam India Versus Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 682 RANJEET KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 683 H&M Pvt. Ltd. vs Legal Metrology Department, Govt. of NCT of Delhi 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 684 SRI SATYA SAI UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY AND MEDICAL SCIENCES SEHORE v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 685 THE STATE v. MAIKALE RAM & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 686 Blackberry India Pvt Ltd. Versus The Assistant Commissioner, Central Excise And CGST Division 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 687 AKEBIA THERAPEUTICS INC. v. CONTROLLER GENERAL OF PATENTS, DESIGN, TRADEMARK AND GEOGRAPHICAL INDICATIONS, & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 688 Diamond Entertainment Technologies Pvt Ltd & Ors. vs Religare Finvest Limited 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 689 Reliance Infrastructure Limited v. Madhyanchal Vidhyut Vitran Nigam Limited 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 690 HERO MOTOCORP LIMITED v. SHREE AMBA INDUSTRIES 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 691 PCIT Versus ARN Infrastructure Ltd. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 692 PCIT Versus Yakult Danone India Pvt. Ltd. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 693 LK v. OPM 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 694 NARENDER BHUTANI v. ANJALI BHUTANI 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 695 MANOHAR LAL SHARMA v. CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION (C.B.I) & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 696 SUN PHARMA LABORATORIES LTD. v. FINECURE PHARMACEUTICALS LTD& ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 697 Geeta Sharma vs Public Enterprises Selection Board & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 698 Emami Limited vs Dabur India Ltd. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 699 XYZ v. BHARAT PRAKASHAN (DELHI) LTD AND ORS 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 700 Y.K. Goyal v. Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 701 R.K. KAPOOR v. NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 702 Steelman Telecom Limited v. Power Grid Corporation of India Limited 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 703 RDB AND CO(HUF) v. HARPER COLLINS PUBLISHERS INDIA PVT. LTD. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 704 CONFERENCE FOR HUMAN RIGHTS (INDIA) (REGD.) v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. and other connected matter 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 705 CCL M A v. STATE (NCT) OF DELHI and other connected matters 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 706 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION v. SOUTH MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 707 M/S Vikas Enterprises Versus Commissioner Of Central Tax (GST) 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 708 Deepak Khandelwal Proprietor Versus Commissioner Of CGST 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 709 Darpan Kohli Versus Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 710 SUMAIYA JAN @ SOUMAYYA v. STATE NCT OF DELHI 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 711 M/s G.S. Express Pvt Ltd v. NTPC Ltd 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 712 ABHIJIT MISHRA v. RESERVE BANK OF INDIA & ANR and other connected matter 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 713Delhi High Court Stays Income Tax Reassessment Proceedings Initiated Against Oxfam IndiaCase Title: Oxfam India Versus Deputy Commissioner Of Income TaxCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 682The Delhi High Court has stayed the income tax reassessment proceedings initiated against Oxfam India."A counter-affidavit will be filed within the next six (6) weeks. Rejoinder thereto, if any, will be filed at least five days before the next date of hearing. In the meantime, there shall be a stay on the continuation of the reassessment proceeding till further directions of the court," the bench of Justice Rajiv Shakdher and Justice Girish Kathpalia has observed.The assessee/appellant has challenged the reassessment notice under Section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.[POCSO Act] Mere Absence Of Injuries On Victim’s Private Parts No Ground To Hold That Penetrative Sexual Assault Did Not Take Place: Delhi High CourtTitle: RANJEET KUMAR YADAV v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHICitation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 683The Delhi High Court has observed that mere absence of injuries on victim’s private parts cannot be a ground to hold that penetrative sexual assault under the POCSO Act did not take place.Justice Amit Bansal made the observation while upholding the conviction of a man for committing rape of a four and a half years old girl in June 2017.The court observed that the man, who was the minor’s neighbor, was not able to shake the version of the prosecution which had successfully proved its case beyond reasonable doubt.Delhi HC Quashes Summons Issued To H&M Over Alleged Violation Of 2011 Legal Metrology RulesCase: H&M Pvt. Ltd. vs Legal Metrology Department, Govt. of NCT of DelhiCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 684The Delhi High Court bench led by Justice Amit Bansal quashed a summoning order against H&M Pvt. Ltd., situated at Select City Walk Mall, Saket for violating Section 13(3)(b) of the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011 [“2011 Rules”]. H&M Pvt. Ltd. is a multinational clothing company based in Sweden that focuses on fast-fashion clothing. Upon being inspected, the Legal Metrology Department wrongfully concluded that H&M Pvt. Ltd. had not followed the mandatory labelling requirements. The High Court held that the 2011 Rules are not applicable...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: August 14 To August 20, 2023

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags