Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: August 19 To August 25, 2024

Citations 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 917 to 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 933NOMINAL INDEXVedanta Limited Versus ACIT 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 917 Shree Bhavani Power Projects Pvt. Ltd. Versus ITO 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 918 JagatMitra Foundation v Union of India through the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and Ors. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 919 SBC Minerals Pvt. Ltd. Versus Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 920 JCB INDIA LIMITED AND ANR v. THE COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ANR 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 921 Honasa Consumer Limited Vs Rsm General Trading Llc 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 922 RESILIENT INNOVATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED v. ASHNEER GROVER 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 923 M/S Chinar Steel Industries Vs Ircon International Limited 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 924 MOHAMMED ZUBAIR v. STATE OF GNCT & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 925 Amit Jain vs. Sanjeev Kumar Singh & Anr (Crl.A. 1248/2019) 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 926 GUNJAN AS GUARDIAN OF PIHU v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. and other connected matters 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 927 ESS Singapore Branch Versus DCIT 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 928 Raj Kumari Taneja Vs Rajinder Kumar & Anr. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 929 Bharat Broadband Network Ltd. Vs Paramount Communications Ltd 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 930 MRS C v. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPARTMENT, GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 931 The Central Public Information Officer (CPIO) vs A K Jain 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 932 ANKUSH & ANR. v. STATE 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 933 Amount Paid For Obtaining Mining Rights In E-Auctions Can't Be Construed As Income; Delhi High Court Quashes Reassessment OrderCase Title: Vedanta Limited Versus ACITCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 917The Delhi High Court has quashed the reassessment order and held that the amount paid for obtaining mining rights in e-auctions cannot be construed as income.The bench of Justice Yashwant Varma and Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju has observed that the Department of Mines and Geology had merely provided to the AO the total amount paid by the petitioner for obtaining mining rights in the e-auctions that were conducted. Section 80-IA(7) Deduction Can't Be Denied For Failure To Digitally File Audit Report: Delhi High CourtCase Title: Shree Bhavani Power Projects Pvt. Ltd. Versus ITOCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 918The Delhi High Court has held that the deduction under Section 80-IA(7) of the Income Tax Act cannot be denied for the mere failure of the assessee to digitally file an audit report.The bench of Justice Yashwant Varma and Justice Ravinder Dudeja has observed that Audit Report was duly furnished to the AO and was available to be scrutinised and examined by that authority during the assessment proceedings, the provisions of Section 80-IA(7), as it stood prior to the amendments introduced in 2020, would be recognized to have been substantially fulfilled. Delhi High Court Asks Centre To Decide Plea Against "Illegal" Online Sale Of Hookahs Without Proper Health WarningCase title: JagatMitra Foundation v Union of India through the Ministry of Health and Family Welfare and Ors.Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 919The Delhi High Court has directed the Centre to treat as a representation a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petition seeking immediate action against the "illegal online sale of hookahs" on e-commerce platforms without specific health warnings.During the hearing a division bench of Acting Chief Justice Manmohan and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela orally said to the counsel appearing for the Centre, "He (petitioner) is highlighting a very important point. You must decide it. He is saying that the field is covered by a statutory provision. It is not being implemented. Which is the implementing agency. You must lay down a standard of procedure".Word 'Approved' By PCCIT For Reopening Of Assessment Not Enough, Reasons Necessary, Delhi High CourtCase Title: SBC Minerals Pvt. Ltd. Versus Assistant Commissioner Of Income TaxCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 920The Delhi High Court has held that mere appending of the word “approved” by the PCCIT while granting approval under Section 151 of the Income Tax Act to the reopening under Section 148 is not enough.Competition Commission Of India Must Honour Outcome Of Mediation, Settlements Between Parties: Delhi High CourtTitle: JCB INDIA LIMITED AND ANR v. THE COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA AND ANRCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 921The Delhi High Court has recently observed that the Competition Commission of India (CCI) must honour the outcomes of mediation and respect the settlements reached between the parties.A division bench comprising of Justice Prathiba M Singh and Justice Amit Sharma said regulatory authorities such as the CCI are no exception to mediation process and settlements.Court Has Power To Grant Anti-Enforcement Injunction Against Proceedings In Foreign Court Which Threaten Arbitral Process Initiated In India: Delhi High CourtCase Title: Honasa Consumer Limited Vs Rsm General Trading LlcCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 922The Delhi High Court...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: August 19 To August 25, 2024

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags