Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: January 20 To January 26, 2025

Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 66 to 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 94NOMINAL INDEXM/s Jaiprakash Associates Limited v. M/s NHPC Limited 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 66 KBS Industries Ltd & Anr. v. The Customs Central Excise And Service Tax Settlement Commission Principal Bench New Delhi & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 67 Sanjay Kumar v. SEBI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 68 Ramesh Chander Vs Election Commission Of India 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 69 AIZAZ KILICHEVA @ AZIZA @ MAYA v. STATE NCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 70 MANDIR PUJARI SH ABHIMANYU SHARMA v. GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 71 Roppen Transportation Services Private Limited Vs.Nipun Gupta & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 72 Kuldeep Singh Sengar v. CBI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 73 SUDHIR KUMAR v. THE STATE NCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 74 JOGINDER SINGH @ JOGINDER RANA v. NIA 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 75 RK Yadav Through Director Of Income Tax Inv-II And Ors v. Dinesh Kumar 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 76 REKHA KAKKAR v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 77 Broad Peak Investment Holdings Ltd. And Anr vs. Broad Peak Capital Advisors LLP And Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 78 ZAKIR HUSSAIN v. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 79 MUMTIYAJ ALI v. SDM KARAWAL NAGAR & ANR and other connected matters 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 80 DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION v. RAMJAS SCHOOL 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 81 Cholamandalam Ms General Insurance Co. Ltd vs. Usha Gupta & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 82 WTC NOIDA DEVELOPMENT COMPANY PVT. LTD V. MS. ARTI KHATTAR & ORS. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 83 Vijay Enterprises & Anr v. The Principal Commissioner Of Customs & Anr 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 84 M/S Om Gems And Jewellery v. Deputy Commissioner Of Customs (Import) Air Cargo Complex Nscbi Airport & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 85 JYOTI ALIAS KITTU v. THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 86 DR. PUSHPALATA AND ANR v. RAM DAS HUF & ORS. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 87 TIRUPATI NARASHIMA MURARI v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 88 Dr. S.R. Sharan v. Election Commission of India & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 90 VIJENDER GUPTA & ORS v. GOVERNMENT OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 91 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax – 1, New Delhi v. DCM Shriram Ltd. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 92 SAIF ALI @ SOHAN v. THE STATE GNCT OF DELHI and other connected matters 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 93KGF COTTONS PVT LTD v. HALDIRAM SNACKS PVT LTD 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 94Referral Courts At Post-Award Stage Must Protect Parties From Being Forced To Arbitrate Non-Arbitrable Claims: Delhi High CourtCase Title: M/s Jaiprakash Associates Limited v. M/s NHPC LimitedCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 66The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Subramonium Prasad, while refusing to appoint an arbitrator in a Section 11 petition, has held that the referral court in a post-award stage must protect the parties from being forced to arbitrate when, after prime facie scrutiny of the facts the claims are found to be non-arbitrable. The court applied the 'eye of the needle' test, which allows the referral court to reject arbitration in exceptional circumstances where the claims are deadwood.Trader Cannot Accept Settlement Commission's Order U/S 127C Of Customs Act 'In Parts': Delhi High CourtCase title: KBS Industries Ltd & Anr. v. The Customs Central Excise And Service Tax Settlement Commission Principal Bench New Delhi & OrsCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 67The Delhi High Court has held that an order passed by the Settlement Commission under Section 127C of the Customs Act, 1962 is in the nature of a 'settlement' and cannot be accepted by a trader only in part.A division bench of Acting Chief Justice Vibhu Bakhru and Justice Swarana Kanta Sharma observed, “Given the nature of the order passed under Section 127C of the Act – which is in the nature of a settlement – it would not be permissible to dissect the same and accept that parts of the order which are favourable to the applicant while rejecting the other directions which are not. The order of Settlement Commission must be accepted in entirety. ”Court Not Prohibited From Looking Into Material Considered By SEBI While Adjudicating Plea For Compounding Of Offence: Delhi High CourtCase title: Sanjay Kumar v. SEBICitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 68The Delhi High Court has held that the SEBI (Settlement Proceedings) Regulations, 2018, cannot prohibit any Court from looking into material which led the SEBI or its High Powered Advisory Committee (HPAC) to allow or reject a plea for compounding of offences alleged under the SEBI Act, 1992.Regulation 29(2) of the Settlement Regulation provides that material placed before the HPAC or the Board cannot be used as evidence before any court or Tribunal.Delhi High Court Dismisses Plea Seeking ECI To Specify Special Circumstances For Using EVMs In Each ConstituencyCase title: Ramesh Chander Vs Election Commission Of IndiaCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 69The Delhi High Court has dismissed an appeal seeking directions to the Election Commission of India (ECI) to comply with Section ...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: January 20 To January 26, 2025

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags