Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: July 17 To July 23

Citations 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 599 to 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 618NOMINAL INDEXX v. Y 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 599 RUPINDERJIT KAUR v. THE MANAGER, DHANPATMAL VIRMANI SR. SEC. SCHOOL AND ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 600 IDFC First Bank Limited v. Hitachi MGRM Net Limited 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 601 PERNOD RICARD INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 602 MANUDEV DAHIYA v. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH DG ITBP 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 603 NHAI v. IRB Pathankot Amritsar Toll Road Ltd 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 604 Sterlite Power Transmission Limited v. EPC Solutions LLP 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 605 M/S Goldy Engineering Works Versus Commissioner Of Central Excise 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 606 RXPRISM HEALTH SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. v. CANVA PTY LTD & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 607 Shrikant Prasad v. Union of India & Ors 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 608 CHAPTER 4 CORP vs DHANPREET SINGH TRADING AS M/S PUNJABI ADDA 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 609 Suman Chadha v. SFIO 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 610 NARESH SHARMA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 611 RAJIV BOOLCHAND JAIN v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 612 NISHANT SINGHAL v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 613 The Commissioner Of Income Tax -4 Versus GE India Business Services Pvt. Ltd. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 614 ALOK KUMAR v. HARSH MANDER & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 615 MAJOR GENERAL M.S. AHLUWALIA v. M/S TEHELKA.COM & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 616 SUJEET AND ANR v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 617 National Highways Authority of India vs GVK Jaipur Expressway Private Limited 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 618Maintenance Case: Delhi High Court Sets Aside Arrest Warrant Against Man With Bipolar DisorderCase Title: X v. YCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 599Ruling that the provision under Section 105 of the Mental Healthcare Act, 2017 is mandatory in nature, the Delhi High Court has set aside an arrest warrant against a man, who said he is suffering from Bipolar Disorder, Generalized Anxiety Disorder and Depression.The warrant had been issued by the court below in an execution petition filed by the man's wife in relation to an order directing him to pay a maintenance of over Rs.1 lakh per month to her and their minor daughter under Domestic Violence Act.Merit List Can’t Stay Alive Indefinitely For Enforcement, Does Not Confer Any Right Of Appointment On Selected Candidates: Delhi High CourtTitle: RUPINDERJIT KAUR v. THE MANAGER, DHANPATMAL VIRMANI SR. SEC. SCHOOL AND ORS.Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 600The Delhi High Court has observed that a merit list cannot stay alive for an indefinite period for enforcement and that it does not confer any right of appointment upon the selected candidates.Justice Chandra Dhari Singh made the observation while dismissing a plea moved by a candidate who was aggrieved of her non-selection and non-confirmation to the post of Trained Graduate Teacher, Maths at Dhanpatmal Virmani Senior Secondary School. Writ Against Order Under Section 16 Of A&C Act; Maintainable Only In Exceptional Cases: Delhi High Court ReiteratesCase Title: IDFC First Bank Limited v. Hitachi MGRM Net LimitedCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 601The Delhi High Court has held that a writ petition against an order of arbitral tribunal rejecting an application under Section 16 of A&C Act is maintainable only in exceptional cases.Justice Prathiba M. Singh held in view of the Supreme Court judgment in Vidya Drolia, the disputes falling under RDB Act, 1993 would be non-arbitrable as the DRT would have the exclusive jurisdiction to decide these matters, however, the Court would not interfere with the arbitral proceedings unless it is ex-facie clear that the dispute falls under the RBD Act.Delhi High Court Dismisses Pernod Ricard’s Plea Against Rejection Of Application For L-1 Liquor License, Permits It To Approach Appellate AuthorityTitle: PERNOD RICARD INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANRCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 602The Delhi High Court has dismissed a plea moved by French company Pernod Ricard against the Delhi Department of Excise's rejection of its application for L-1 license to sell liquor in the national capital.Justice Prathiba M Singh rejected the plea due to non-maintainability and said that Pernod Ricard must approach the Appellate Authority under the Excise Act, 2009 to challenge the order passed by the Delhi Government’s excise department on April 13.Pernod Ricard’s application for liquor license was rejected on the ground that various documents were received from CBI and ED alleging its participation in the alleged liquor policy scam, involving Delhi’s former Deputy Chief Minister Manish Sisodia and various others.Will Take Action Against Senior Officers Of Central Armed Police Forces For Passing 'Biased' And 'Vindictive' Orders Against Juniors: Delhi High CourtTitle: MANUDEV DAHIYA v. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH DG ITBPCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 603Deprecating the conduct of a Commandant posted in the Indo-Tibetan Border Police for acting with...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: July 17 To July 23

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags