Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: March 10 To March 16, 2025

Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 299 to 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 320NOMINAL INDEXRattan India Power Ltd. v. BHEL 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 299 Eureka Forbes Limited vs.Om Sai Enterprises & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 300 Puma SE vs. Mahesh Kumar 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 301 JSD Traders LLP v. Additional Commissioner, GST 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 302 Ramada International, Inc. vs. Clubramada Hotels And Resorts Private Limited & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 303 Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. WGF Financial Services Pvt. Ltd. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 304 WRESTLING FEDERATION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS PRESIDENT MR. SANJAY SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF YOUTH AFFAIRS AND SPORTS & ORS. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 305 Cargill India Private Limited v. Central Board Of Direct Taxes. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 306 MOHD. MUNIB v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) AND ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 307 M/S Ismartu India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of India And Others 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 308 M/S Ismartu India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union Of India And Others 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 309 State Bank of India vs. M/S. P. P. Jewellers Private Limited (M/S. P. P. JEWELLERS PRIVATE LIMITED) 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 310 JOHNSON & JOHNSON v. PRITAMDAS ARORA T/A M/S MEDSERVE & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 311 ISHA FOUNDATION v. GOOGLE LLC & ORS. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 312 M/s ARSS Infrastructure Projects Ltd. v. National Highway Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 313 Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 314 NAVAL KISHORE KAPOOR v. NIA 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 315 Amirhossein Alizadeh v. The Commissioner Of Customs & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 316 VIJAY KUMAR @ CHAMPION v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 317 Living Media India Limited & Anr. vs. Telegram FZ LLC & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 318 Aabi Binju versus Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 319 M/S Smartschool Education Private Limited Vs M/S Bada Business Pvt. Ltd And Ors 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 320Arbitral Awards Can Be Granted On The Basis Of Evidentiary Admissions: Delhi High CourtCase Title: Rattan India Power Ltd. v. BHELCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 299The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Prateek Jalan has observed that the power to pass an award on admissions is wide, and evidentiary admissions (admissions contained outside pleadings) can also form the basis of an arbitral award.Delhi High Court Issues Permanent Injunction Against Trademark & Copyright Infringement Of Acquaguard's Spare Parts, Imposes ₹2 Lakh CostsCase title: Eureka Forbes Limited vs.Om Sai Enterprises & OrsCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 300The Delhi High Court has granted permanent injunction in favour of Eureka Forbes Limited which owns 'Acquaguard', restraining a manufacturer of spare parts of water purification systems from infringing on its trademarks and copyrights.Eureka Forbes Limited (plaintiff) manufactures and sells water purifiers and its spares and consumables under the 'AQUAGUARD' and formative trademarks.Trademark Infringement: Delhi High Court Directs Manufacturer Of Counterfeit Products To Pay ₹11 Lakh To PumaCase title: Puma SE vs. Mahesh KumarCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 301The Delhi High Court granted a permanent injunction in favour of Puma, restraining a manufacturer of counterfeit products from selling products under Puma's trademarks and its logos.Observing that the manufacturer engaged in a blatant act of counterfeiting, Justice Mini Pushkarna directed the manufacturer of counterfeit products to pay Rs. 11 lakh in damages and costs to Puma.S.29 CGST Act | SCN Must Reflect Both Reasons And Intent Of Retrospective Cancellation Of Registration: Delhi High CourtCase title: JSD Traders LLP v. Additional Commissioner, GSTCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 302The Delhi High Court has made it clear that an order cancelling GST registration of a trader with retrospective effect will not sustain unless the show cause notice preceding such decision reflects both the reasons and the authority's intent for retrospective cancellation.Delhi High Court Issues Permanent Injunction Against Trademark Infringement Of Ramada International, Awards ₹10 Lakh DamagesCase title: Ramada International, Inc. vs. Clubramada Hotels And Resorts Private Limited & Anr. Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 303The Delhi High Court has granted a permanent injunction in favour of the American hotel chain Ramada International, against trademark infringement by a party using the 'Ramada' mark as its corporate name.Ramada International (plaintiff) submitted that it adopted the trademark RAMADA in 1954 for its hotel in Arizona, USA. It stated that it franchises and manages over 900 hotels across more than 60 countries including India.S.36 Income Tax Act | Deduction For Bad Debt Allowed Only If Assessee Lends In Ordinary Course Of Banking/Money Lending Business: Delhi HCCase title: Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-7 v. WGF Financial Services Pvt. Ltd.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 304The Delhi High Court has made it clear that...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: March 10 To March 16, 2025

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags