Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: March 24 To March 30, 2025

Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 353 to 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 394NOMINAL INDEXFAITH CONSTRUCTIONS versus N.W.G.E.L CHURCH 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 353 F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG & ANR v. NATCO PHARMA LIMITED 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 354 CREATIVELAND ADVERTISING PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. WINZO GAMES PRIVATE LIMITED 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 355 SIDDHARTH SOOD versus MUNISH KUMAR AGGARWAL 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 356 Bridgestone Corporation vs. M/S Merlin Rubber 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 357 Jai Durga Rubberised Fabrics India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner Of Customs 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 358 Sai Kiran Goud Tirupathi v. Commissioner Of Customs 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 359 AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 360 Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions) v. Indian Broadcasting Foundation 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 361 ASHLOK v. THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI and other connected matter 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 362 Paras Products v. Commissioner Central Gst, Delhi North (and batch) 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 363 Abdul Rashid Sheikh v. NIA 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 364 Husky Injection Molding Systems Shanghai Ltd & Ors. v. Union Of India & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 365 Lavkush Kumar v. Union of India & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 366 SUNEHRI BAGH BUILDERS PVT LTD versus DELHI TOURISM AND TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 367 RADICO KHAITAN LIMITED versus HARISH CHOUHAN 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 368 APPLAUSE ENTERTAINMENT PRIVATE LIMITED v. WWW.9XMOVIES.COM.TW & ORS. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 369 Louis Vuitton Malletier vs. Raj Belts & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 370 M/S GTL INFRASTRUCTURE LTD versus S.C WADHWA AND SONS (HUF) 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 371 Ivy Entertainment Private Limited vs. HR Pictures 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 372 MS. RUCHI KALRA & Ors v. SLOWFORM MEDIA PVT. LTD & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 373 SH VIJAI PRATAP SINGH v. DELHI HIGH COURT, THROUGH REGISTRAR GENERAL & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 374 RESILIENT INNOVATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S BHARAT PAY AND ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 375 RAHUL SINGH versus BORDER SECURITY FORCE & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 376 Mohammad Arham v. Commissioner Of Customs 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 377 National Restaurant Association v. Union Of India & Anr 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 378 Ashow Swain v. Union of India & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 379 AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA versus DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT LIMITED & ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 380 Abdul Rashid Sheikh v. NIA 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 381 Huawei Telecommunications India Company Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle 2 & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 382 Mohd. Salim Khan v. State 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 383 Rakesh Kumar Gupta v. DRI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 384 Avika Shahi And Anr vs. Medical Counselling Committee And Ors 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 385 HOSHIAR SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS and other connected matters 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 386 SANOJ KUMAR MISHRA VS. STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 387 VIKAS CHAWLA @ VICKY v. THE STATE NCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 388M/s Dewan Chand v. Chairman cum Managing Director and Another 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 389 RAMCHANDER versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 390 The Commissioner Of Central Tax, CGST Delhi East v. M/S Simplex Infrastructure Limited 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 391 Vedanta Limited v. CBIC 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 392 Backbone Overseas v. Assistant Commissioner Of Customs, Foreign Post Office , New Delhi And Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 393 Shiv Parkash Bansal v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-14 Delhi & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 394 Court's Jurisdiction U/S 11(6) Of A&C Act Is Decided Under CPC When No Seat Or Venue Is Specified In Arbitration Agreement: Delhi High CourtCase Title: FAITH CONSTRUCTIONS versus N.W.G.E.L CHURCHCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 353The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Manoj Kumar Ohri has held that in the absence of a specified seat or venue in the Arbitration Agreement, the court's jurisdiction under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act) is determined by Sections 16 to 20 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 (CPC). The relevant factors include where the respondent resides or conducts business and where the cause of action arose.Availability Of Drug For Rare Diseases At Economical Prices Material Factor To Be Considered Before Restraining Via Interim Injunction: Delhi HCTitle: F. HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE AG & ANR v. NATCO PHARMA LIMITEDCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 354The Delhi High Court has observed that availability of a drug for treatment of rare diseases at economical and competitive prices is a material factor to be considered for grant of interim injunction in an intellectual property right (IPR) lawsuit.Delhi High Court Upholds Arbitrator's Refusal Of Injunction Against Use Of Tagline "Jeeto Har DinZo" By Winzo GamesCase Title: CREATIVELAND ADVERTISING PRIVATE LIMITED Vs. WINZO GAMES PRIVATE LIMITEDCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 355The Delhi High Court bench of Justice Subramonium Prasad has upheld the findings of the Arbitrator, who...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: March 24 To March 30, 2025

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags