Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: March 25 To March 31, 2024

Citations 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 360 to 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 384NOMINAL INDEXTechno Compact Builders v. Railtel Corporation of India Limited 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 360Rani Construction v. Union of India 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 361aDharamvir & Company v. DDA 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 362VIACOM 18 MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. JOHN DOE & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del)MANJU PANDEY v. STATE THROUGH SHO PS WAZIRPUR & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 364WOW MOMO FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED v. WOW PUNJABI 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 365PIDILITE INDUSTRIES LTD v. SANJAY JAIN & ANR 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 366KIRTI v. RENU ANAND & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 367ARVIND KEJRIWAL v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 368GOVIND SARAN SHARMA v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 369AKSHAT BALDWA & ORS. v. YASH RAJ FILMS & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 370INDIAN NATIONAL CONGRESS v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX and other connected matters 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 371ARPIT BHARGAVA v. GNCT OF DELHI 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 372SURJIT SINGH YADAV v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 373PCIT Versus Rashmi Rajiv Mehta 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 374JIYA THROUGH HER NEXT FRIEND AND NATURAL MOTHER MS. SUSHMA v. MAHARAJA AGRASEN MODEL SCHOOL & ANR. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 375Department Of Transport Govt Of Nct Of Delhi Vs Green City Transport Corporation Pvt Ltd 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 376Psa Protech And Infralogistics Pvt. Ltd. Vs Food Corporation Of India 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 377Vijay Kumar Mishra Construction Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Director Vijay Kumar Mishra vs The Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 378Nbcc India Ltd Vs Micro Small And Medium Enterprises Facilitation Council & Anr. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 379Oriel Financial Solutions v. Bestech Advisors Pvt Ltd 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 380Fusionnet Web Services v. Yash Fiber Network 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 381M/S Delhi Msw Solutions Limited vs Amity Software Systems Limited 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 382Manju Gupta & Ors. Vs Shri Vilas Gupta & Ors 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 383Jetibai Grandsons Services India Pvt Ltd Versus Union Of India & Ors. 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 384Panel Consisting Of 23 Names Cannot Be Considered Broad-Based If It Lacks Arbitrators From Different Backgrounds: Delhi High CourtCase Title: Techno Compact Builders v. Railtel Corporation of India LimitedCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 360The High Cout of Delhi has held that a panel consisting of 23 names cannot be considered broad-based if lacks arbitrators from different backgrounds.The bench of Justice Dinesh Kumar Sharma held that a panel must not only be broad in terms of numbers but should also reflect diversity by having arbitrators from diverse backgrounds.Membership Of An Arbitral Institution Cannot Be Insisted Upon As A Pre-Requisite For Invoking Arbitration: Delhi High CourtCase Title: Rani Construction v. Union of IndiaCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 361The High Court of Delhi has held the membership of an arbitral institution cannot be insisted upon as a pre-requisite for invoking arbitration.The bench of Justice Sachin Datta held that when parties agree to resolve their dispute through an arbitral institution, such an agreement cannot be construed to mean that they have agreed to take its membership.Mere Delay By Employer Would Not Entitle The Contractor To Damages Unless The Loss Is Pleaded And Proved: Delhi High CourtCase Title: Dharamvir & Company v. DDACitation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 362The High Court of Delhi has held that merely because the delay in the execution of the work is attributable to the employer, the same would not entitle the contractor to claim damages unless it pleads and proves that such delay resulted in loss to it.The bench of Justices Vibhu Bakhru and Tara Vitasta Ganju held that a procedural order passed by the earlier arbitrator, not being a final decision on the merits, does not preclude the substitute arbitrator from deciding the claims on their merits. It held that an order cannot be treated as an interim award when the issue was left to be decided on the merits at a later stage.Delhi High Court Passes Dynamic+ Injunction, Restrains Rogue Websites From Illegally Streaming IPL EventsTitle: VIACOM 18 MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. JOHN DOE & ORS.Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 363The Delhi High Court has passed a dynamic+ injunction order and restrained various rogue websites from illegally streaming Indian Premier League (IPL) events without authorisation of Viacom 18.Justice Sanjeev Narula said that the legal remedies must remain robust and effective in curtailing copyright infringement, particularly in the fast-paced environment of the internet.High Court Directs Delhi Police To Ensure Complainants' Personal Information Is Not Put In Pubic Domain On ZIPNET To Avoid Cyber CrimesTitle: MANJU PANDEY v. STATE THROUGH SHO PS WAZIRPUR & ANR.Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (Del) 364The Delhi High Court has directed the Delhi Police to ensure that vital personal information of the complainants in missing cases is not put in the public domain on ZIPNET (Zonal Integrated Police Network)...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: March 25 To March 31, 2024

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags