Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: May 08 To May 14

Citations 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 377 to 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 400NOMINAL INDEXDharampal Satyapal Sons Private Limited vs Google L.L.C. & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 377AARSHI R KAPOOR & ANR v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR and other connected matter 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 378Virander Kumar Sharma Punj & Anr v. GNCTD & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 379INDEPENDENT THOUGHT v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 380Kismatun v. State 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 381P. SARATH CHANDRA REDDY v. DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 382SANJEEV KUMAR v. THE STATE NCT OF DELHI 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 383AMIT JAIN v. MAHAVIR INTERNATIONAL PVT LTD & ORS 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 384Nishant Khatri v. BCI 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 385MAHESH KUMAR v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 386Manoj Tiwari v. Manish Sisodia & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 387PepsiCo Inc. & Anr. vs Jagpin Breweries Limited & Anr. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 388Union of India vs Reliance Industries Limited & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 389SA v. MA 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 390X & Y v. Z 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 391JAQUAR COMPANY PVT LTD v. VILLEROY BOCH AG & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 392The Indian Hotels Company Limited vs Vivanta Hospitality Private Limited 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 393Uno Minda Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner Revenue Department 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 394Azmat Ali Khan v. Union of India & Ors 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 395SAKIB AHMED v. STATE NCT OF DELHI 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 396PRADEEP KUMAR SHARMA v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SECRETARY & ORS 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 397RAMESH ABHISHEK v. LOKPAL OF INDIA & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 398CHARANJIT SINGH AHLUWALIA v. UNION OF INDIA 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 399OPENTV INC v. THE CONTROLLER OF PATENTS AND DESIGNS AND ANR 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 400Delhi High Court Orders Google To Block Youtube Videos Claiming Indian Spices Contain Cow Dung, UrineCase Title: Dharampal Satyapal Sons Private Limited vs Google L.L.C. & Ors.Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 377The Delhi High Court has directed Google to take down Youtube videos claiming that Indian spices contain cow urine and cow dung — while displaying images of 'Catch' products — in case they resurface on the video sharing platform. Google told the court that the impugned videos are no longer available for viewing.Justice Sanjeev Narula said that the YouTube Channels - ‘TVR’ and ‘Views NNews’, maliciously uploaded the videos containing derogatory and untrue remarks against Indian spices, particularly those sold under the 'Catch' brand and deliberately attempted to defame and disparage its goods, by creating and uploading the said videos.Ensure Strict Compliance Of Law Against Unauthorised Alteration, Fitment Of Crash Guards In Motor Vehicles: Delhi High Court To Union GovtTitle: AARSHI R KAPOOR & ANR v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR and other connected matterCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 378The Delhi High Court has directed the Union of India to ensure strict compliance of law against unauthorised alteration or fitment of crash guards or bull bars in vehicles under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.Section 52 of the Act states that no owner of a vehicle shall alter it in a manner that the particulars contained in the certificate of registration are at variance with those originally specified by the manufacturer.A division bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Tushar Rao Gedela observed that there is already a mechanism in place for taking appropriate action against those persons who are violating the provision.Delhi High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Introduction Of Legal Studies As Separate Subject In SchoolsTitle: Virander Kumar Sharma Punj & Anr v. GNCTD & Ors.Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 379The Delhi High Court has dismissed a public interest litigation seeking introduction of legal studies compulsorily as an elective or optional subjects in all schools.A division bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramonium Prasad said that the subject matter is purely in the domain of the government and that such direction cannot be issued by court.Mandatory Reporting Provisions Of POCSO Act Override Restrictions Imposed Under Section 198(1), 198(3) Of CrPC: Delhi High CourtTitle: INDEPENDENT THOUGHT v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR.Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 380The Delhi High Court has held that Section 19 read with Section 21 of the POCSO Act, which provide for mandatory reporting of the offences under the enactment, shall override the restrictions imposed under Section 198(1) read with Section 198(3) of Cr.P.C.A division bench of Justice Manmohan and Justice Saurabh Banerjee also said that there is no distinct category within child victims of rape as those who are married and those who are not.The bench, however, clarified that it has not dealt with the larger issue of “marital rape” of an adult woman.Statement Of Youth Beaten & Forced To Sing Vande Mataram During Riots Be Recorded Before Magistrate: Delhi High CourtTitle: Kismatun v. StateCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 381The Delhi High Court has ordered that statement of a man, who was one of...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: May 08 To May 14

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags