Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: May 11 To May 17, 2026

Citations 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 475 to 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 497NOMINAL INDEXJ & Anr. v. State 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 475 Mrs. Khushnuma Khan And Others v. UoI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 476 SANJAY SHARMA AND ANR v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 477 State v. MK 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 478 BHAVREEN KANDHARI v. VIJAY KUMAR BIDHURI AND ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 479 Kamlesh Mehta v. TTFI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 480 Rajeshwar Dayal Aggarwal v. M/S Enicar Machine (India) 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 481 Allahabad Bank v. RS Saini 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 482 Rajan v. State 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 483 Sabir v. State 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 484 Aakash Goel v. GNCTD 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 485 Rubika Thapa v. Union of India & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 486 TUSHAR VERMA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 487 BRIJESH KOTHIA v. STATE NCT OF DELHI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 488 Vimal Singh v. State 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 489 RIFAT ALI @ DANISH v. STATE NCT OF DELHI 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 490 Azad Saifi v. Akhtar Ali 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 491 RT v. GNCTD 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 492 SIDDHARTH VARADARAJAN v. Union of India 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 493 KAMAL KAPOOR v. STATE 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 494 CBI v. Kuldeep Singh & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 495 TRIMURTI FILMS PRIVATE LIMITED v. B62 STUDIOS PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 496 DDPL Global Infrastructure Private Limited & Anr. v. ED 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 497Husband's Pension-Receiving Parents Can't Be Treated As Fully Dependent To Reduce Wife, Child's Maintenance: Delhi High CourtCase title: J & Anr. v. StateCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 475The Delhi High Court has held that while a man has a legal and moral obligation to maintain his elderly parents, however, such parents receiving regular pension cannot be treated as “fully dependent” on him so as to substantially reduce the maintenance payable to his wife and minor child.Mere Eviction From Jhuggi Cluster, Rehabilitation At Alternate Site Doesn't Violate Article 21 If DUSIB Safeguards Are Followed: Delhi High CourtCase title: Mrs. Khushnuma Khan And Others v. UoICitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 476The Delhi High Court has held that mere eviction of jhuggi dwellers and their rehabilitation at an alternative site would not violate their fundamental rights under Article 21 of the Constitution of India, so long as the safeguards prescribed under the Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board (DUSIB) Policy and Protocol are complied with.Delhi High Court Orders Restoration Of '4PM' YouTube Channel, Directs Temporary Blocking Of 'Objectionable' VideosTitle: SANJAY SHARMA AND ANR v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORSCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 477The Delhi High Court has ordered restoration of YouTube channel “4PM”, which was blocked pursuant to directions issued by the Centre citing concerns of national security, sovereignty and public order, subject to temporary suspension of 26 allegedly objectionable videos.Taunting Wife Over 'Small Car', Insufficient Gold Prima Facie Amounts To Cruelty U/S 498A IPC: Delhi High CourtCase title: State v. MKCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 478The Delhi High Court has held that repeated taunts directed at a woman over allegedly bringing insufficient dowry, including remarks about a “small car” and lesser quantity of gold, prima facie amount to cruelty under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code.High Court Stays Delhi Government's SOP Allowing Tree Pruning Without Prior PermissionTitle: BHAVREEN KANDHARI v. VIJAY KUMAR BIDHURI AND ORSCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 479The Delhi High Court has stayed the operation of a Standard Operating Procedure (SoP) issued by the Delhi Government last year permitting “general tending and light pruning” of tree branches having girth less than 15.7 cm without prior permission from the Tree Officer.Delhi High Court Sets Aside TTFI Order Suspending Olympian Kamlesh Mehta From Post Of Secretary General Without HearingCase title: Kamlesh Mehta v. TTFICitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 480The Delhi High Court has set aside an order of the Table Tennis Federation of India (TTFI) suspending its Secretary General Kamlesh Mehta — described by the Court as an “illustrious veteran” of Indian table tennis.Industrial Dispute | Employer's Head Office In Delhi Not Enough To Confer Territorial Jurisdiction In Delhi Labour Courts: High CourtCase title: Rajeshwar Dayal Aggarwal v. M/S Enicar Machine (India)Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 481The Delhi High Court has held that the situs of employment and the place where termination takes effect are the determinative factors for identifying the “appropriate Government” in industrial disputes.Labour Court Cannot Adjudicate Disputed Service Entitlements Like TA/DA Under Section 33C(2) ID Act: Delhi High CourtCase title: Allahabad Bank v. RS SainiCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Del) 482The Delhi High Court has held that Labour Courts exercising jurisdiction under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 cannot adjudicate disputed service entitlements and are confined only to computation or recovery of pre-existing...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: May 11 To May 17, 2026

Nupur Thapliyal

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Nupur Thapliyal

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: May 11 To May 17, 2026

Nupur Thapliyal

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Nupur Thapliyal

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers