Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: May 22 To May 28

Citations 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 425 to 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 451NOMINAL INDEXMaj Pankaj Rai v. NIIT Ltd 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 425SMT. CHETNA RATHEE v. CHAHIT KUNDU 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 426UNION OF INDIA & ANR. v. SHRI. JOGINDER SINGH 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 427Kiran Thakur vs Resident Commissioner Bihar Bhavan 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 428RITVIK SINGH v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 429ANAND v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 430KAMALJEET SEHRAWAT v. OFFICE OF LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR OF DELHI & ORS. and other connected matter 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 431JUSTICE FOR ALL v. LAXMI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY AND ORS 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 432DR PRANNOY ROY & ANR. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 433Carpet Export Promotion Council Versus Union Of India 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 434RDB AND CO. HUF v. HARPERCOLLINS PUBLISHERS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 435PROF. DR. SANJEEV BAGAI & ORS. v. DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (ENVIRONMENT AND FOREST) & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 436Satish Chandra Verma v. UOI & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 437ADV. SHIV KUMAR v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 438Shruti Sharma v. UOI & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 439RITU CHERNALIA v. AMAR CHERNALIA & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 440VK & ANR versus STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 441Roadway Solutions India Infra Limited vs National Highway Authority of India 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 442DR. RAJENDRA KUMAR PACHAURI v. INDU JAIN & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 443M/s Vindhya Vasini Construction Co vs M/s Bharat Heavy Electricals Ltd 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 444Central PWD Engineers Assoc. & Anr. V. UOI & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 445SANJAY GANDHI MEMORIAL TRUST v. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION) & ORS. and other connected matters 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 446Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd. & Anr vs Telecom Regulatory Authority Of India 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 447KUSH KALRA v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 448MR. YUSUFFALI MUSALIAM VEETTIL ABDUL KADER vs MR. SHAJAN SKARIAH & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 449New Delhi Nature Society v. Rajesh Bansal & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 450INDU KAPOOR v. AU SMALL FINANCE BANK & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 451Reasons For Bias Do Not Fall Under VII Schedule Of A&C Act , Petition Is Abuse Of Process Of Court : Delhi High CourtCase Title: Maj Pankaj Rai v. NIIT LtdCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 425The Delhi High Court has held that an arbitrator can be removed under Section 14(1)(a) which provides for de jure ineligibility of arbitrator only if his appointment falls within the grounds mentioned under the VII Schedule.The bench of Justice Chandra Dhari Singh held that the mandate of the arbitrator on grounds of bias and prejudice cannot be terminated if the test of the Schedule VII is not satisfied as the grounds mentioned therein are the only situations that render an arbitrator de jure ineligible to act as arbitrator.Family Courts Expected To Not Adopt Hyper-Technical Approach And Close Party’s Right To Cross Examination In Hurried Manner: Delhi High CourtTitle: SMT. CHETNA RATHEE v. CHAHIT KUNDUCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 426The Delhi High Court has observed that the family courts are expected to not adopt a “hyper-technical approach” and close the right of cross examination of a party in a hurried manner while dealing with matrimonial cases.Justice Rekha Palli made the observation while setting aside an order passed by the family court rejecting a wife’s application for restoration of her right to cross examine the husband, who had appeared as a prosecution witness.Govt Employee Should Not Be Denied Medical Reimbursement For Emergency Treatment Merely Due To Non-Empanelment Of Hospital: Delhi High CourtTitle: UNION OF INDIA & ANR. v. SHRI. JOGINDER SINGHCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 427The Delhi High Court has ruled that the medical claim of a government employee for reimbursement of treatment undertaken in emergency should not be denied merely because the hospital was not empanelled with CGHS facility.A division bench of Justice V. Kameswar Rao and Justice Anoop Kumar Mendiratta observed that the test would be to see whether the claimant had actually undertaken the treatment in emergent condition as advised and if the same is supported by record.No Sympathy Or Compassion For Employees Submitting Forged Documents To Employer: Delhi High CourtCase Title: Kiran Thakur vs Resident Commissioner Bihar BhavanCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 428The Delhi High Court has said that employees who are guilty of submitting forged documents to their employer have to be dealt with in a strict manner. It said such persons are certainly unfit to be employed and no sympathy or compassion can be shown to such an employee.The bench of Justice Mini Pushkarna made the observation while upholding the termination order of a woman who was dismissed from services by the Bihar Bhavan for submitting a forged class 8th pass certificate.The court noted that there was a clear finding made by the...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: May 22 To May 28

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags