Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: November 27 To December 03, 2023

Citations 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1173 to 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1209NOMINAL INDEXMohit Kumar and Anr. v. Office of the Insurance Ombudsman and Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1173 Filo Edtech Inc v. Union of India & Anr. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1174 Universal City Studios LLC. & Ors. v. Fztvseries.Mobi & Ors 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1175 Ms SK Educations Pvt Ltd v. Sripathi Bhushan Srichandan & Anr. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1176 AERO CLUB v. M/S SAHARA BELTS 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1177 Resorts Consortium India Limited Versus ITAT 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1178 Muneer Ahmad v. Registrar of Trade Marks 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1179 Upinder Kaur Malhotra v. Capt Teghjeet Singh Malhotra and Anr 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1180 Dabur India Limited v. Ashok Kumar and Ors 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1181 BABY ADIRA JATIA & ORS. v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1182 FAHIM v. STATE 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1183 Shubham Chopra v. Union of India 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1184 Asset Reconstruction Company India Ltd v. ATS Infrastructure Limited 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1185 RESILIENT INNOVATIONS PRIVATE LIMITED v. MADHURI JAIN GROVER & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1186 AVTAR SINGH KOCCHAR @ DOLLY v. ENFORCEMENT DIRECTORATE 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1187 H.P. Cotton Textile Mills Ltd v. The Oriental Insurance Company Limited 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1188 Newton Engineering and Chemicals Limited and Ors v. Uem India Pvt Ltd 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1189 JATIN KHURANA v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1190 Vermeet Singh Taneja v. Jasmeet Kaur 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1191 ACHLA DHAWAN v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1192MOHD. TASLIM ALI v. THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1193BOLT TECHNOLOGY OU v. UJOY TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1194ASHWINI KUMAR UPADHYAY v. UNION OF INDIA AND ANR and Other Connected Matters 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1195Ischemix LLC v. The Controller of Patents 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1196Pooja Menghani v. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India & Anr. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1197ANJURI KUMARI v. THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1198Rahul Bhardwaj and Anr v. The Govt of National Capital Territory of Delhi and Anr 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1199Nikhil Rana v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Ors.M 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1200MISSION SAVE CONSTITUTION v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1201Mr. Maahi Neil Jaipal (Minor) v. University of Delhi & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1202Shri Chintan Bindra Versus DCIT 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1203SOMDUTT SINGH @ SHIVAM v. NARCOTICS CONTROL BUREAU 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1204MAKEMYTRIP INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. DIALMYTRIP TECH PRIVATE LIMITED 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1205Vishnu Das Through Peherokar v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Anr. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1206N.K. Sharma v. The General Manager Northern Railways 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1207Taqa India Power Ventures v. NCC Infrastructure Holdings 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1208Maj Dr. Sachin Bapusaheb Khandagale v. Union of India & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1209Writ Petition Maintainable If Insurer Disallows Claim De Hors Specific Policy Terms: Delhi High CourtCase Title: Mohit Kumar and Anr. v. Office of the Insurance Ombudsman and Ors.Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1173Allowing a couple’s insurance claim in respect of travel bookings cancelled due to Covid-19 onset, the Delhi High Court recently held that a writ petition would be maintainable if the court finds that insurer has illegally repudiated the claim de hors specific terms of the policy.Observing that the court could exercise jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution to enforce a life insurance claim, Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav said,“The determination of the question depends on consideration of several factors i.e., whether a writ petitioner is merely attempting to enforce his/her contractual rights or the case raises important questions of law and constitutional issues, the nature of the dispute raised, the nature of inquiry necessary for determination of the dispute etc.”Situs Of High Court For Appeal U/S 117A Of Patents Act Determined By “Appropriate Office” Under Patent Rules: Delhi High CourtCase Title: Filo Edtech Inc v. Union of India & Anr.Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1174Justice C. Hari Shankar of the Delhi High Court recently held that the situs of the High Court which would hear an appeal u/s 117A of the Patents Act would be determined by the location of the “appropriate office” in terms of Rule 4 of the Patent Rules.The observation came to be made pursuant to raising of an objection to territorial jurisdiction in an appeal filed u/s 117A(2) of the Patents Act, whereby rejection of a patent application filed before the Mumbai Patent Office was assailed before the Delhi High Court.Delhi High Court Grants 'Dynamic+ Injunction' Restraining 45 Rogue Websites From Distributing Copyrighted Content Of Disney, Netflix & OthersCase Title: Universal City Studios LLC. & Ors. v. Fztvseries.Mobi & OrsCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 1175Justice Prathiba M. Singh of the Delhi High Court recently granted an ex-parte...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: November 27 To December 03, 2023

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags