Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: October 20 To October 26, 2025

Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1327 to 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1365NOMINAL INDEXEarthz Urban Spaces Pvt. Ltd. v. Ravinder Munshi & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1327 RAHUL @ BHUPINDER VERMA v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1328 X v. STATE OF NCT & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1329 NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA. versus HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO. LTD 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1330 M/S H P SPINNING MILLS PVT. LTD. versus UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1331 MAHESH SHRIVASTVA @ JEEVA v. STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1332 WOW MOMO FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED v. WOW BURGER & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1333 NATIONAL HIGHWAY INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LTD (NHIDCL) versus NSPR VKJ JV & ORS. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1334 GAURAV AGGARWAL versus RICHA GUPTA 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1335 MARS INCORPORATED v. CADBURY (INDIA) LTD & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1336 MANORAMA SAKKERWAL v. MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1337 VARUN ARYA v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1338 DEEPAK NANDA v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1339 Mudit Gupta v. AAI & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1340 SUMIT SINGH v. STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1341 SHAHID NASIR v. NIA & ANR 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1342 ABUZAR @ ANTA v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1343 NAVEEN KUMAR v. BABITA JAIN 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1344 MRS. ANSHIKA KUMARI v. BAR COUNCIL OF DELHI AND OTHERS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1345 MAHINDRA HZPC PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS v. SHRI RAM FARMS & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1346 X v. Y 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1347 Shubham Agarwal v. Union of India 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1348 Bed Ram v. UoI & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1349 Rajia @ Sabbo v. State 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1350 Sunair Hotels Ltd. v. State & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1351 PC Jhalani & Ors v. Jhalani Tools (India) Ltd & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1352 Writer Business Services Pvt. Ltd v. UIDAI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1353 The Indian Hotels Company Limited v. John Doe & Anr. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1354 Pr. Commissioner Of Income Tax v. M/S. Remfry And Sagar 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1355 Save India Foundation v. GNCTD 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1356 M/S B S Enviro N Infracon Private Limited v. Vij Contracts Pvt. Ltd. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1357 Sh. Samarendra Das v. M/S Win Medicare Pvt. Ltd. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1358 Union of India Through Secretary & Ors. vs. S K Jasra 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1359 The Indian Hotels Company Limited v. Vivanta Stays 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1360 Arjun Patil v. UOI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1361 Future Consumer Limited v. UOI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1362 M/S Moms Cradle Private Limited v. UOI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1363 Alkali Manufacturers Association of India v. UOI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1364 M/S Balaji Enterprises v. The Principal Commissioner, DGGI, Meerut Zonal Unit & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1365Courts Can Exempt Property From Doctrine Of Lis Pendens To Protect Genuine Owners From Vexatious Suits: Delhi High CourtCase title: Earthz Urban Spaces Pvt. Ltd. v. Ravinder Munshi & Ors.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1327The Delhi High Court has held that courts can exempt a property from the doctrine of lis pendens, to shield genuine owners from vexatious suits.The doctrine stems from Section 52 of the Transfer of Property Act 1882. It stipulates that any transfer of property during a pending lawsuit affecting that property is subject to the outcome of the lawsuit.Delhi High Court Acquits Man In POCSO Case, Says Alleging 'Physical Relations' Without Evidence Doesn't Establish RapeTitle: RAHUL @ BHUPINDER VERMA v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI)Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1328While acquitting a man in a POCSO case, the Delhi High Court has ruled that mere use of the term “physical relations” without supporting evidence is insufficient to establish rape or aggravated penetrative sexual assault.Magistrate Order Summoning Accused Despite Cancellation Report Can Be Challenged In Revisional Jurisdiction: Delhi High CourtTitle: X v. STATE OF NCT & ANRCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1329The Delhi High Court has ruled that an order passed by a Magistrate issuing process or summoning an accused, despite a cancellation report filed by the police, can be challenged in revisional jurisdiction before the sessions court or the High Court.CA-Certified Audited Statements Are Valid Proof Of Actual Expenditure: Delhi High Court Partly Upholds Arbitral Award Against NHAICase Title: NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA. versus HINDUSTAN CONSTRUCTION CO. LTDCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1330The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (Arbitration Act) filed by National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) against an arbitral award passed in favor of Hindustan Construction Company Ltd. (HCC). The court further held that the arbitrator's award of compensation for expenses incurred during extended time period was reasoned, plausible and did not suffer from perversity or patent illegality.Clause In Insurance Policy...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: October 20 To October 26, 2025

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags