Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: September 01 To September 07, 2025

Citations 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1050 to 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1068NOMINAL INDEXSharjeel Imam v. State & other connected matters 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1050 VIKAS VERMA v. DIRECTOR OF PROSECUTION AND ORS. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1051 Himanshu v. TCNS Clothing Co. Ltd 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1052 AJAY KUMAR NAYYAR v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHI 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1053 X v. Y 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1054 Chetan v. State 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1055 VGP IPCO LLC & Anr v. Mr Suresh Kumar Trading As Om Shiv Lubricants & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1056 STUMPP SCHUELE LEWIS MACHINE TOOLS PVT LTD v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1057 Mitraj Business Private Limited Through Its Director Mr Manoj Kankane v. Union Of India Represented By The Secretary Ministry Of Finance & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1058 Rama Oberoi v. State 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1059 Dr. Punita K. Sodhi vs UOI & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1060 Castrol Limited v. Sanjay Sonavane 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1061 BHEL v. Xiamen Longking Bulk Material Science and Engineering Co. 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1062 Rahul Solanki v. CRPF 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1063 Gurpreet Singh Sonik v. Commissioner Of Customs 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1064 Sangeet Seth v. Chief Commissioner of Income Tax 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1065 Leelawati v. Rajeev Kumar 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1066 Tasleem Ahmed v. State 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1067 M/s. KNR Tirumala Infra Pvt. Ltd. versus National Highways Authority of India 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1068Delhi Riots: High Court Denies Bail To Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam And 7 Others In UAPA CaseTitle: Sharjeel Imam v. State & other connected matters Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1050The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail pleas filed by Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam and seven other accused persons in the 2020 Delhi riots "larger conspiracy" case.A division bench of Justice Naveen Chawla and Justice Shalinder Kaur pronounced the verdict.Also from the judgment - Trial Against Umar Khalid & Others Will Progress In Natural Pace; Hurried Trial Will Affect Rights : Delhi High CourtDelhi High Court Stays Advertisement For Appointing Only Retired Public Prosecutors As APPsTitle: VIKAS VERMA v. DIRECTOR OF PROSECUTION AND ORS.Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1051The Delhi High Court has stayed an advertisement restricting appointment of only retired public prosecutors as Assistant Public Prosecutors (APPs).Justice Sachin Datta passed the order on a plea filed by one Vikas Verma challenging the advertisement issued by the Delhi Government's Directorate of Prosecution on August 22.Non-Impleadment Of Firm In Cheque Bounce Case Is Curable Defect: Delhi High CourtCase title: Himanshu v. TCNS Clothing Co. LtdCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1052The Delhi High Court has held that non-impleadment of a firm in cheque bounce case instituted against its partner under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act is a curable defect.Thus allowing a complainant/ payee to amend the pleadings subject to ₹35,000/- cost, Justice Amit Mahajan observed,“This Court is of the view that the non-impleadment of the firm is a curable defect...the stage of effective trial has not commenced yet. The accused has not yet faced the process of recording of plea, evidence, or cross-examination. In such circumstances, it cannot be said that permitting an amendment to implead the partnership firm would cause prejudice to the petitioner. On the contrary, refusal to allow such an amendment would result in stifling of proceedings on a mere technicality, thereby defeating the object of Section 138 of the NI Act.”Delhi High Court Denies Bail To Man Accused Of Cheating Businessman By Impersonating Amit Shah's NephewTitle: AJAY KUMAR NAYYAR v. STATE OF NCT OF DELHICitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1053The Delhi High Court has denied bail to a man accused of cheating a businessman of Rs. 3.90 crores by impersonating as the nephew of Union Home Minister Amit Shah.Justice Girish Kathpalia passed the order considering the nature and expanse of the allegations, coupled with the pending consideration of amendment in charge to include offences of forging documents punishable with life imprisonment and also keeping in mind the antecedents.Significant Increase In Husband's Income, Cost Of Living Valid Factors To Enhance Wife's Maintenance: Delhi High CourtTitle: X v. YCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1054The Delhi High Court has ruled that rise in the income of the husband, coupled with the significant increase in his cost of living, constitute a “clear change in circumstances”, warranting enhancement of the amount of maintenance to the wife.State Can't Curtail Reformative Provisions Like Parole, Furlough In Name Of Disciplining Prison Inmates: Delhi High CourtCase title: Chetan v. StateCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (Del) 1055The Delhi High Court frowned upon the Delhi government for withdrawing a notification which prescribed that a punishment of warning imposed upon a prisoner shall not stand in his way of seeking furlough.Justice Girish Kathpalia observed that the said withdrawal was a...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: September 01 To September 07, 2025

Nupur Thapliyal

Tags