Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: September 04 To September 10, 2023

Citations 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 785 to 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 812NOMINAL INDEXCASA2 STAYS PVT LTD v. BBH COMMUNICATIONS INDIA PVT LTD 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 785MOHD. IRSHAD & ANR. v. NADEEM 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 786RAVI BHUSHAN UPADHYAY v. THE STATE 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 787THE SURGICAL MANUFACTURERS & TRADERS ASSOCIATION THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE v. UNION OF INDIA and other connected matter 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 788RAJESH KUMARI v. DHIRAJ & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 789Mamta v. Pradeep Kumar 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 790PREETI v. VIKAS 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 791VAIBHAV KUMAR v. STATE NCT OF DELHI & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 792AARIF HUSSAIN v. SHRI AJAY KUMAR BHALLA AND ORS 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 793THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI v. BABITA & ORS 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 794GLOBAL MUSIC JUNCTION PVT. LTD. v. SHATRUGHAN KUMAR AKA KHESARI LAL YADAV & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 795Jindal Stainless Ltd Versus DCIT 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 796RAHUL MOHOD v. THE GOVT. OF NCT DELHI & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 797PW v. RW 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 798M/S Frequent Logistics Services PVT. LTD. v. Commissioner Goods and Service Tax Department And ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 799AMAN GUPTA v. STATE 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 800National Restaurant Association v. Union Of India & Anr. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 801DEFSYS SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 802Promoshirt SM SA v. Armassuisse and Anr and other connected matter 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 803WASIM AHMAD & ORS. v. GOVERMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 804DR. S. JAITLEY & ANR. v. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 805THE TRUSTEES OF PRINCETON UNIVERSITY v. THE VAGDEVI EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY & ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 806Gopal Corporates LLP Versus Commissioner Delhi-East 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 807PCIT Versus Surya Agrotech Infrastructure Limited 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 808NIPUN SINGHAL v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 809SAURAV CHAUDHARY v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 810RELIANCE INDUSTRIES LIMITED & ANR. v. AJIO ONLINE SHOPPING PVT LTD AND ORS. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 811Captain Arvind Kathpalia v. GNCTD & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 812Principles Of Natural Justice Not Violated When The Opportunity To Make Oral Submission Is Not Availed: Delhi High CourtCase Title: CASA2 STAYS PVT LTD v. BBH COMMUNICATIONS INDIA PVT LTDCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 785The Delhi High Court has held that the principles of natural justice are not violated when the opportunity to make oral submissions on an issue was granted but not availed by the party. It held that no party has the absolute right to insist on his convenience in every respect.The bench of Justices Suresh Kumar Kait and Neena Bansal Krishna held that an Arbitrator has a right to manage the proceedings and to give directions to the parties to be present on a particular date, time and place and this would be sufficient compliance of the principles of natural justice.Father’s Second Marriage After First Wife's Death Doesn't Per Se Disqualify Him From Being Child’s Natural Guardian: Delhi High CourtTitle: MOHD. IRSHAD & ANR. v. NADEEMCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 786The Delhi High Court has observed that mere second marriage of the father, when he lost his first wife, cannot be held per-se a disqualification from his continuing to be a natural guardian of his child.A division bench of Justice Suresh Kumar Kait and Justice Neena Bansal Krishna also observed that even the disparity in the financial status cannot be a relevant factor for denying the custody of a child to the natural parent.Courts Can’t Be Used As "Matrimonial Facilitators" For Pressurizing Rape Accused To Get Married To Victim Or To Obtain Bail: Delhi High CourtCase Title: RAVI BHUSHAN UPADHYAY v. THE STATECitation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 787The Delhi High Court has observed that courts cannot be used as “matrimonial facilitators” for pressurizing the accused to get married to the victim or be denied bail in sexual assault cases.Justice Swarna Kanta Sharma added that courts can also not be used by the accused for obtaining bail by asking the complainant to appear before the court and state that he was ready to get married to her.‘Clearly A Policy Matter’: Delhi High Court Upholds Centre’s Decision Notifying All Medical Devices As DrugsCase Title: THE SURGICAL MANUFACTURERS & TRADERS ASSOCIATION THROUGH ITS AUTHORISED REPRESENTATIVE v. UNION OF INDIA and other connected matterCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (Del) 788The Delhi High Court has upheld the validity of a 2020 notification issued by the Union Ministry of Health & Family Welfare notifying all medical devices, intended for use on human beings or animals, as drugs within the meaning of Section 3(b)(iv) of the Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940.A division bench comprising Justice Rajiv Shakdher and Justice Tara Vitasta Ganju observed that the Union Government, in its wisdom, thought it fit to bring all medical devices within the ambit of the expression “drug”, which is clearly a policy matter.Acrimonious Relationship Between Parents No Ground ...

Delhi High Court Weekly Round-Up: September 04 To September 10, 2023

Nupur Thapliyal