LiveLaw Gujarat High Court Monthly Digest: June 2026

Citations: 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 165 - 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 181Nominal IndexArjun Kuruveetil Peethmbaran v/s The Police Inspector & Ors., 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 165Rajeshbhai Laljibhai Patel v/s v/s State of Gujarat & Anr., 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 166Asharam v/s State of Gujarat & Anr., 2026 LiveLaw (Gu) 167Gujarat Energy Transmission Company Ltd. through v/s Naniba WD/O Gemarsinh Rupsinh Sodha & Ors., 2026 LiveLaw (Gu) 168Kishanji Maganji Thakore & Ors. v/s Collector of Baroda & Ors. and batch, 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 169Mohammad Bilal Gulam Rasul Kagazi v/s State of Gujarat & Anr., 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 170Shahnawaz Sirajuddin Siddiqui v/s Marufa, 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 171Heirs of Mahant Dayaramdas- Bai Padma WD/o Dayaramdas (Deleted) & Ors. v/s Charity Commissioner & Ors., 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 172Union of India v/s Meenadevi W/O Hariprasad Gupta & Ors., 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 173Rahul Babulal Purohit & Anr. v/s State of Gujarat & Anr., 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 174Rakeshkumar Ramanbhai Gohil v/s State of Gujarat & Anr.,2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 175Mohammed Asgarali Mohammad Vajirali v/s State of Gujarat & Ors., 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 176Dr. Vilas Tukaram Kharat v/s Union of India & Ors., 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 177Unnati Jasmin Shah & Ors. v/s Municipal Corporation & Anr., 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 178Mohammad Aarif Abdul Razak Samol v/s State of Gujarat, 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 179X v/s Y, 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 180Jitendrasinh Narasinh Rathod v/s State of Gujarat, 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 181Judgments/OrdersFreezing Bank Account Without Proving Account Holder's Involvement In Criminal Case Adversely Affects Fundamental Rights: Gujarat High CourtCase title: Arjun Kuruveetil Peethmbaran v/s The Police Inspector & Ors.R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1961 of 2026Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 165Directing the de-freezing of a man's bank account, the Gujarat High Court observed that while investigating agency has power to direct freezing, however without specifying the quantum of suspected amount or without establishing involvement of the account holder in any criminal activity, results in adversely affecting his fundamental rights.The court was hearing a man's plea seeking de-freezing of his bank account over a cyber crime complaint pertaining to alleged suspicious transaction of Rs. 1100; in the interim the petitioner had sought a direction to the bank to permit him to operate the account by keeping only the disputed amount of 1,100/- on hold.Person Accused Of Offences Not Mentioned Under Section 82(4) CrPC Not Deemed As Proclaimed Offender: Gujarat High CourtCase title: Rajeshbhai Laljibhai Patel v/s v/s State of Gujarat & Anr. R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (QUASHING) NO. 7316 of 2026Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 166The Gujarat High Court has said that a person accused of only those offences enumerated under Section 82(4) can be declared a proclaimed offender noting that the nature of the offences was serious also carrying the safeguard of an inquiry as provided under the provision.It further said that a person accused of offences other than the ones under section 82(4) and against whom a proclamation has been published under section 82(1) can be called a 'Proclaimed Person'.2013 Rape Case: Asaram Withdraws Plea For Extension Of Temporary Bail From Gujarat High CourtCase title: Asharam v/s State of Gujarat & Anr. CR.MA/1/2026Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Gu) 167Asaram, who has been convicted and sentenced to life by Gandhinagar court in a 2013 rape case, withdrew from Gujarat High Court on Friday (June 12) his application seeking extension of temporary bail.The counsel appearing for Asaram submitted before a division bench of Justice Gita Gopi and Justice LS Pirzada that the Rajasthan High Court had recently upheld Asaram's conviction and life sentence in a separate rape case and he is presently in jail in Jodhpur"Under instructions I may be permitted to withdraw the application for extension of temporary bail," the counsel said.Electricity Company 'Absolutely Liable' In Electrocution Death Case, Can't Escape By Blaming Deceased's Negligence: Gujarat High CourtCase title: Gujarat Energy Transmission Company Ltd. through v/s Naniba WD/O Gemarsinh Rupsinh Sodha & Ors.R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 1310 of 2012Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Gu) 168The Gujarat High Court has held that when energy transmitted through electricity line causes injury or death of a human being, who unknowingly comes in contact with it, then it is primary liability of the Electricity Company to compensate the sufferer as per the principle of absolute liability. [2026 LiveLaw (Gu) 168]The court was hearing an appeal by Gujarat Energy Transmission Co. Ltd. (GETCO), challenging a judgment and decree dated 31.1.2012 passed by trial court which had directed GETCO to pay Rs.9,40,000/- with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of filing of the suit till realization for the death of Gemarsinh Sodha.After 35 Years, Gujarat High Court Rejects Baroda Royal Family's Claim Over Property Belonging To Temple TrustCase title:...

LiveLaw Gujarat High Court Monthly Digest: June 2026

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

LiveLaw Gujarat High Court Monthly Digest: June 2026

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers