LiveLaw Gujarat High Court Weekly Round-Up: July 06 - July 12, 2026

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 186 - 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 194Nominal IndexSatrabhai Ramabhai Damor v/s State of Gujarat, 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 186State of Gujarat v/s Chimanbhai Bhanubhai Chaudhari & Anr., 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 187 State of Gujarat v/s Jahid @ Javed Kutubuddin Shaikh & Ors., 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 188Vishal @Kano Hemantbhai Kasangara (As Per Order) v/s State of Gujarat, 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 189Yogesh Amrutbhai Patel v/s Hansaben Yogeshbhai Patel, 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 190Ankitkumar Ramchandra Padhiyar (Mali) v/s State of Gujarat, 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 191Manubha @ Vanrajsinh Bachubha Zala & Anr. v/s State of Gujarat, 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 192Villa C Colony Karamchari Associations President Rajnikant Kamaljit Solanki v/s Executive Engineer Project & Ors., 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 193Sawaisinh Devisingh Chauhan v/s Yashwantsinh Mahansinh Rathod, 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 194Judgments/OrdersSessions Court 'Prima Facie' Exceeded Bail Jurisdiction By Directing Executive Action On Alleged Land Grabbing, Mob Violence: Gujarat High CourtCase title: Satrabhai Ramabhai Damor v/s State of GujaratR/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR SUCCESSIVE REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 12593 of 2026Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 186The Gujarat High Court has summoned the Law Officers branch, observing that the sessions court had "prima facie exceeded its jurisdiction" under S.483 BNSS which relates to bail, by referring its order to various state authorities for implementation of Supreme Court's directions in mob lynching cases.Notably the sessions court had denied bail to three accused of assaulting forest and police personnel, observing that it was a land grabbing offence and the District Magistrate needs to take appropriate action.No Evidence Of Aluminium Foil On Kaju Katli Being Harmful: Gujarat High Court Upholds Sweet Shop Owners' Acquittal For AdulterationCase title: State of Gujarat v/s Chimanbhai Bhanubhai Chaudhari & Anr. R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 918 of 2008Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 187The Gujarat High Court has upheld the acquittal of sweet shop owners accused of food adulteration, after noting that in absence of any evidence that aluminium foil coating on Kaju Katli sample was injurious to health, the mere use of such foil for coating the sweet would not make it adulterated. [2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 187]Justice Hemant M Prachchhak said that the findings recorded by the trial Court was not justified and it was not in consonance with the facts of the present case, even though there was a legal principle as enunciated by the Supreme Court which was brought to the trial court's notice.2008 Ahmedabad Serial Blasts: Gujarat High Court Upholds Death Sentence For 38, Life Imprisonment For 11 ConvictsCase title: State of Gujarat v/s Jahid @ Javed Kutubuddin Shaikh & Ors. R/CC/2/2022, R/CR.A/1710/2022, R/CR.A/1917/2022, R/CR.A/1710/2023, R/CR.A/2106/2023, R/CR.A/727/2024Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 188The Gujarat High Court on Tuesday (July 7) upheld a 2022 Special Court order awarding death sentence to 38 and life imprisonment to 11 convicts in the 2008 Ahmedabad Serial Blast Case, which claimed 56 lives.Gujarat High Court Grants Bail To Man Booked For Extorting Complainant With AI-Generated 'Defamatory Videos'Case title: Vishal @Kano Hemantbhai Kasangara (As Per Order) v/s State of GujaratR/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 12421 of 2026Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 189The Gujarat High Court has granted bail to a man booked for extorting the complainant by threatening of creating defamatory videos against him using Artificial Intelligence. [2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 189]It was alleged that the applicant and the co-accused persons entered into a criminal conspiracy, collected confidential information relating to the complainant and the witness, and by using Artificial Intelligence created defamatory videos to extort money from them. It was alleged that the accused persons demanded an amount of Rs. 23,00,000/- from the complainant.S.14 HMA | Family Court Can't Discuss Merits Of 'Premature' Suit For Divorce Filed Within One Year Of Marriage: Gujarat High CourtCase title: Yogesh Amrutbhai Patel v/s Hansaben Yogeshbhai Patel R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 3246 of 2024Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 190The Gujarat High Court has held that where a suit for divorce is premature, having been presented within 1 year of marriage which is barred under Section 14 Hindu Marriage Court, the family court cannot decide the issue on merits and can only either return the plaint or dismiss it reserving the parties' right to file afresh. [2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 190]The husband had filed an appeal before the high court against family court's judgment dismissing his suit for divorce filed under Section 13(1)(ia) and (ib) Hindu Marriage Act, on the preliminary ground of limitation.Gujarat High Court Grants Bail To Law Student Accused Of Facilitating Cricket Betting Syndicate, Finds No Money TrailCase title: Ankitkumar Ramchandra Padhiyar (Mali) v/s State of...

LiveLaw Gujarat High Court Weekly Round-Up: July 06 - July 12, 2026

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

LiveLaw Gujarat High Court Weekly Round-Up: July 06 - July 12, 2026

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers