LiveLaw Gujarat High Court Weekly Round-Up: August 24 - August 30, 2026

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

1 Sept 2026 12:00 PM IST

  • LiveLaw Gujarat High Court Weekly Round-Up: August 24 - August 30, 2026

    Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 227 - 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 232Nominal IndexJavedkhan Soramkhan Mandori v/s State of Gujarat, 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 227Faiz Enterprise Through Proprietor Mahetar Mahir Farukhbhai v/s State Tax Officer, Unit-67, Surat & Anr., 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 228Yasmeen WD/O Nadirbhai Devani v/s Rajkot Municipal Corporation, 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 229Chaitarbhai Damjibhai Vasava v/s...

    Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 227 - 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 232

    Nominal Index

    Javedkhan Soramkhan Mandori v/s State of Gujarat, 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 227

    Faiz Enterprise Through Proprietor Mahetar Mahir Farukhbhai v/s State Tax Officer, Unit-67, Surat & Anr., 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 228

    Yasmeen WD/O Nadirbhai Devani v/s Rajkot Municipal Corporation, 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 229

    Chaitarbhai Damjibhai Vasava v/s State of Gujarat, 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 230

    Kavitaben Manharlal @ Manoj Babulal Soni v/s State of Gujarat, 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 231

    Salimbhai Abubakarbhai Lakhani & Ors. v/s Aksanabanu Samirbhai Lakhani D/O Abdul Rasirbhai Dholiya & Ors., 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 232

    Judgments/Orders

    Gujarat High Court Grants Bail To Man Accused Of Suicide Abetment, Notes He Was 'Only Taking Side Of His Sister' And Not Threatening Deceased

    Case title: Javedkhan Soramkhan Mandori v/s State of Gujarat

    R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR SUCCESSIVE REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 17454 of 2026

    Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 227

    The Gujarat High Court granted bail to a man accused of abetting a woman's suicide after she was allegedly threatened by him, prima facie observing that the alleged threat had no bearing to the incident since the applicant was only taking his sister's side during her argument with the deceased sister-in-law. [2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 227]

    Justice Nikhil S Kariel in his order noted that the applicant is the brother of deceased woman's sister-in-law who had a dispute with the deceased.

    AI-Generated Case Laws In Tax Order: Gujarat High Court Directs Strict Verification And Human Oversight, Warns Of Contempt

    Case title: Faiz Enterprise Through Proprietor Mahetar Mahir Farukhbhai v/s State Tax Officer, Unit-67, Surat & Anr.

    R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO.10123 of 2026

    Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 228

    The Gujarat High Court quashed a GST cancellation order as well as appellate proceedings against an entity after noting that the State Tax Officer had passed the order relying exclusively on AI-generated case laws, including non-existent and irrelevant authorities. [2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 228]

    A division bench of Justice AS Supehia and Justice Vaibhavi D Nanavati had in its earlier ordered said that it appeared that the Officer's order was passed by placing "reliance exclusively on the AI generated case laws". The court had then asked the State to get instructions.

    Legally Wedded Wife Entitled To Family Pension Despite Husband Nominating Sons Instead: Gujarat High Court

    Case title: Yasmeen WD/O Nadirbhai Devani v/s Rajkot Municipal Corporation 

    R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 465 of 2026

    Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 229

    The Gujarat High Court has held that legally wedded wife's entitlement to family pension cannot be defeated even if the pensioner has nominated a third person thereby excluding her. [2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 229]

    'Prima Facie Responds To Criticism With Violence': Gujarat High Court Refuses To Suspend AAP MLA's 7-Year Sentence In Assault Case

    Case title: Chaitarbhai Damjibhai Vasava v/s State of Gujarat

    CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR SUSPENSION OF SENTENCE) NO. 1 of 2026 In R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1751 of 2026

    Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 230

    The Gujarat High Court on Monday (August 24) refused to suspend the sentence of Aam Aadmi Party MLA from Dediyapada assembly Chaitar Vasava convicted for assaulting and extorting forest officials in a forest land encroachment case wherein he was sentenced by the trial court for seven years. [2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 230]

    The court passed the order on applications seeking suspension of sentence moved by three accused–accused nos.1 Jitendrabhai Vasava, 5 Chaitarbhai Damjibhai Vasava and 7 Rikeshbhai Fulsingbhai Vasava, filed in their appeals challenging the conviction by the trial court.

    'Looteri Dulhan' Case: Gujarat High Court Grants Bail To Marriage Bureau Owner, Notes No Role In Alleged Gang

    Case title: Kavitaben Manharlal @ Manoj Babulal Soni v/s State of Gujarat

    R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 19815 of 2026

    Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 231

    The Gujarat High Court on Tuesday (August 25) granted bail to a woman running a marriage bureau booked in a cheating and criminal breach of trust FIR, noting that her role was limited to solemnizing marriage of complainant's nephew and no role was attributed to her being part of the "Looteri Dulhan gang". [2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 231]

    For context, the term refers to an organized criminal network which allegedly tricks men into fake marriages to rob them of their money.

    'Lived Separately': Gujarat High Court Quashes Domestic Violence Case Against Husband's Sisters Accused Of Instigating Dowry Demand

    Case title: Salimbhai Abubakarbhai Lakhani & Ors. v/s Aksanabanu Samirbhai Lakhani D/O Abdul Rasirbhai Dholiya & Ors.

    R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (QUASHING) NO. 12673 of 2023

    Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 232

    The Gujarat High Court quashed a domestic violence case against two women accused of instigating their brother for demanding dowry from his wife, observing that they were married much prior to the complainant and living separately hence the question of mental and physical torture by them did not arise. [2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 232]

    The son of petitioners 1 and 2 was married to respondent no.1 as per Muslim rites. Due to marital discord, the wife left the matrimonial home along with the couple's two children. It was alleged that after returning to her parental home she lodged a domestic violence complaint against the family members of the husband. The petition was not pressed qua petitioner no.1 father-in-law and petitioner no. 2 the mother-in-law.

    Next Story