- Home
- /
- High Courts
- /
- Gujarat High Court
- /
- LiveLaw Gujarat High Court Weekly...
LiveLaw Gujarat High Court Weekly Round-Up: September 21 - September 27, 2026
LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK
28 Sept 2026 10:00 AM IST
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 251 - 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 258Nominal IndexKamlesh Hukamchand Vishnoi v/s State of Gujarat & Anr., 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 251Lilaben D/O Lallubhai Bhulabhai Zala v/s Dashrathsinh Amarsinh Zala & Ors., 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 252 State of Gujarat & Anr. v/s Samantsinh Gopalsinh Rathod & Ors., 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 253Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation v/s...
This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers
Subscribe Premium
INR 1099+GST
Your support helps us to bring you more content at
an affordable subscription scheme !!!
All payment options available
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 251 - 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 258
Nominal Index
Kamlesh Hukamchand Vishnoi v/s State of Gujarat & Anr., 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 251
Lilaben D/O Lallubhai Bhulabhai Zala v/s Dashrathsinh Amarsinh Zala & Ors., 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 252
State of Gujarat & Anr. v/s Samantsinh Gopalsinh Rathod & Ors., 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 253
Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation v/s Lalji Ishwardas Patel & Anr., 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 254
Sonaben Jayeshkumar Parmar & Ors. v/s Maheskumar Kulabhai Parmar & Ors., 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 255
Vivek Pratapray Maheta v/s State of Gujarat, 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 256
Rakeshumar Navnitlal Shah v/s Hirenkumar Kiritkumar Shah & Ors., 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 257
Arjunbhai Sukhabhai Halpati v/s State of Gujarat, 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 258
Judgments/Orders
Case title: Kamlesh Hukamchand Vishnoi v/s State of Gujarat & Anr.
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR QUASHING & SET ASIDE FIR/ORDER) NO. 7082 of 2018
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 251
The Gujarat High Court has held that a customer at a brothel cannot be booked for running a brothel or procuring a person for prostitution under Immoral Traffic Act. [2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 251]
In doing so the court quashed a 2010 FIR against a man under the Act, who was caught after a raid was conducted at a hotel allegedly being run as a brothel.
Case title: Lilaben D/O Lallubhai Bhulabhai Zala v/s Dashrathsinh Amarsinh Zala & Ors.
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13169 of 2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 252
The Gujarat High Court has said that non-communication of a judgement by the lawyer to the party cannot disadvantage the latter resulting in rejection of appeal on ground of delay when the very lawyer has filed the appeal, specially in absence of gross negligence. [2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 252]
The court was hearing a man's plea challenging an appellate court's order refusing to condone 27 day delay in filing an appeal against district judge's order in a civil suit.
Case title: State of Gujarat & Anr. v/s Samantsinh Gopalsinh Rathod & Ors.
R/SECOND APPEAL NO. 244 of 2009
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 253
The Gujarat High Court has held that a first appeal against a civil suit decree which was earlier admitted, numbered and later transferred by the high court to the trial court pursuant to enactment of Gujarat Civil Courts Act retains its original status and is not barred by limitation. [2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 253]
In doing so the court held that it cannot be said that such transferred appeals were barred by delay or needed an application to condone such delay.
Case title: Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation v/s Lalji Ishwardas Patel & Anr.
R/CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 241 of 2013
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 254
The Gujarat High Court has upheld a trial court court order acquitting a diary farm owner who was booked for selling adulterated ghee after finding that none of the requirements provided for drawing the sample of 'Pure Ghee' under The Prevention of Food Adulteration Rules had been followed. [2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 254]
In doing so the court noted that it was not proved that the container containing the Ghee was properly heated, as prescribed under the Rules, before the sealing and sampling procedure was undertaken.
Case: Sonaben Jayeshkumar Parmar & Ors. v/s Maheskumar Kulabhai Parmar & Ors.
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 875 of 2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 255
The Gujarat High Court enhanced the compensation granted to the family of a deceased pillion rider to over Rs.24 Lakhs, noting that the Motor Accident Tribunal had not properly considered the deceased's monthly income as well as damages under general and non-pecuniary heads. [2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 255]
Justice JC Doshi observed that the tribunal should have a liberal approach while determining the quantum of compensation, as law values life and limb on a generous scale.
Case title: Vivek Pratapray Maheta v/s State of Gujarat
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL) NO. 21886 of 2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 256
The Gujarat High Court denied anticipatory bail to a "journalist" who was accused of impersonating himself as an officer of the Gujarat Pollution Control Board and demanding money from a factory owner to delete photos and videos of contaminated water which was allegedly found there. [2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 256]
The allegation against the applicant was that he along with other accused, represented themselves as GPCB officers, went to the complainant's factory, recorded videos of contaminated water and demanded Rs.21,000 for deleting the videos and photographs. The material collected during investigation indicates the presence and involvement of the applicant in the incident.
Case: Rakeshumar Navnitlal Shah v/s Hirenkumar Kiritkumar Shah & Ors.
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 636 of 2012
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 257
The Gujarat High Court enhanced the compensation awarded to an accident victim to over Rs. 8 Lakh, ruling that the mere continuation of employment of the accident victim after suffering 30% functional disability does not justify adopting a reduced multiplier or denying loss of future prospects. [2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 257]
Justice J. C. Doshi observed that while an injured claimant may continue in their existing service, their overall capacity and future employability elsewhere stand diminished and that a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal cannot apply a reduced “split” multiplier to compute the award.
Case title: Arjunbhai Sukhabhai Halpati v/s State of Gujarat
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR SUCCESSIVE REGULAR BAIL - AFTER CHARGESHEET) NO. 21209 of 2026
Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 258
The Gujarat High Court granted regular bail to a father booked for causing death of his daughter by applying burning cotton wicks on her body on her instructions, as she believed she was possessed. [2026 LiveLaw (Guj) 258]
The applicant had moved the high court seeking regular bail in an FIR for offences under Sections 105(culpable homicide not amounting to murder), 212(Furnishing false information to a public servant) and 54 (Abettor present when the offence is committed) BNS and Section 3 of the Black Magic Act. He was accused of causing the death of his daughter by applying some burning cotton wicks on various parts of her body. This, it was alleged, was done by the accused on the instructions of the daughter who believed that she was possessed.


