Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh High Court Annual Digest [Part I]

Judgments/Orders:Labour Commissioner Competent To Review Ex-Parte Awards Passed Under Workmen's Compensation Act: J&K High CourtCase Title: Sahil Gupta Vs UT of J&KCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (JKL) 1 The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court held that a Labour Commissioner is competent to review his ex-parte orders, while hearing an application to set aside such ex-parte award.A bench of Justice M.A Chowdhary clarified that given the applicability of Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure(CPC), as provided under Rule 31 of the J&K Workmen's Compensation Rules of 1972, the Labor Commissioner is competent to review ex-parte awards.Treating Employee's Absence As 'Dies-Non' A Penalty Measure, Cannot Be Imposed Without Affording Hearing: J&K High CourtCase Title:Abdul Rahim Ganai V/s State of JK and others (SRTC)Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (JKL) 2The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court ruled that a period of willful absence from duty can be treated as 'Dies-Non', but such a measure of penalty cannot be imposed without conducting a fair enquiry and affording the concerned employee an opportunity to be heard.For the period declared as 'Dies Non', an employee would not be eligible for allowance nor would it be counted for retiral benefits.Justice Sindhu Sharma said,“The order adverse to the employee for willfully remaining absent after expiry leave cannot be passed without initiated any disciplinary proceedings. The respondent is competent to direct the period of willful absence be treated as Dies Non but it would be as a measure of penalty and such order cannot be passed without holding enquiry and providing opportunity of hearing to the petitioner”.Subjective Satisfaction Under Preventive Detention Jurisdiction Cannot Rule Out Objectivity: J&K HC Quashes Detention OrderCase Title: Waqas Riyaz Khan Vs UT of J&KCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (JKL) 3The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court quashed the detention order of a detenue citing serious concerns about the grounds of detention being based on a "caricatured" opinion instead of an objective assessment.A bench of Justice Rahul Bharti has observed,“If taken as it is, then any law abiding citizen can be stereotyped at the hands of law and enforcement agency/authority for the sake of being put behind the bars not for any penal act of omission and commission on his/her part amounting to violation of law but just for the reason that law and enforcement agency/authority is so profiling a person to be a bad person”.J&K HC Allows Minors Plea For Passport Rectification Upon Attaining Majority, Directs Adherence To Ministry of External Affairs Guidelines Case Title: MOHAMMAD BIN SHORA Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHERCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (JK) 4Allowing a plea seeking directions to effect changes in the date of birth in the passport the Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court emphasized that an applicant seeking a change in the date of birth in their passport must do so within a reasonable time, specifically within five years from the date of the passport's issuance, with certain exceptions for minors. Press Should Refrain From Publishing Defamatory Content Against Private Citizen If It Serves No Public Interest: Jammu & Kashmir High Court Case Title: Pritam Chand alias Pritam Singh Vs Dr. Kamal Saini.Citation: 2024 LiveLaw (JKL) 5Cautioning the press from publishing contents that are manifestly defamatory against an individual, the Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court observed that content published by the press should be duly verified and there should be sufficient reason to believe that it is true and serves the public good.Debunking “Truth” as a defence for publishing defamatory material against a private citizen where no public interest is involved, Justice Vinod Chaterjee Koul remarked,“...The press has the right to expose cases of corruption and irregularities in public bodies as a custodian of public interest but such reporting should be based on irrefutable evidence, published after due inquiry and verification from the concerned sources and should include the version of the person or authority being commented upon”.O.6 R.17 CPC | Adopt Liberal Approach To Amendments Before Trial Unless It Causes Irreparable Prejudice To Opposite Party: J&K High CourtCase Title: Haja @ Hajira Bano Vs Gh. Mohammad AhangarCitation: 2024 LiveLaw (JKL) 6The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court ruled that courts must adopt a liberal approach and allow amendments under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC) unless they cause irreparable prejudice to the other party or change the very nature of the suit.A bench of Justice M A Chowdhary added that whenever an amendment is sought before the commencement of a trial, a lenient view may be taken keeping in mind that the opposite party would have a chance to meet the case set up by amendment.LOCs Are Coercive Measures Interfering With Liberty, To Be Used Exceptionally Only When Accused Deliberately Evades Justice: J&K High...

Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh High Court Annual Digest [Part I]

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

Tags