M/s Sports Goods Industry v. State of J&K and Others 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 157

Pushpa Devi & Ors. v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 158

Manga Ram v. Union Territory of J&K 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 159

Maqsad Ali Kohli v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 160

Harsh Dev Singh Vs UT of J&K & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 161

Nargees Javaid v. Ghulam Jeelani Nengroo 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 162

Smanla Dorje Nurboo v. Union Territory of Ladakh a/w Deldan Namgail v. Union Territory of Ladakh 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 163

Ghulam Nabi Bhat & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 164

UT of J&K v. Sameer Ahmad Bhat & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 165

Ghulam Mohammad Sheikh & Ors. Vs Gulzar Ahmad Sheikh & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 166

Sanjay Kumar & Anr. Vs Mohan Singh & Anr 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 167

Ahsan ul Haq Khanday Vs UT of J&K & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 168

UT of J&K v. Sameer Ahmad Khan & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 169

UT of J&K & Ors. Vs Sara Begum 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 170

Judgments/Orders:

'State Acted As Predator': J&K&L High Court Orders Industrial Sheds For Kashmiri Pandit Migrant Without Premium Or Arrears

Case Title: M/s Sports Goods Industry v. State of J&K and Others

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 157

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh directed the allotment of two industrial sheds in favour of a Kashmiri Pandit migrant without charging any premium or arrears, holding that the action of the State in cancelling and re-allotting his industrial unit during migration was unjustified.

State Cannot Claim Adverse Possession Over Land Used For Vaishno Devi Pilgrim Facilities, Must Acquire Or Return It: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: Pushpa Devi & Ors. v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 158

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh held that the State cannot be permitted to perfect its title over private land by invoking the doctrine of adverse possession against its own citizens and must either acquire such land in accordance with law or return it.

Investigating Officer Not Bound By FIR; May Alter Offences In Final Chargesheet U/S 173 CrPC Based On Evidence: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: Manga Ram v. Union Territory of J&K

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 159

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh held that the Investigating Officer has wide powers during investigation to collect evidence and include or alter the applicable Sections of law in the final charge-sheet, and that the Sections mentioned in the FIR are not final.

Preventive Detention Based On Speculative Apprehension Of Election Disturbance Unsustainable: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: Maqsad Ali Kohli v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 160

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh held that a detention order founded on speculative apprehension of disturbance to Parliamentary elections, without any proximate or concrete material, fails to satisfy the requirement of a live nexus and is liable to be quashed.

CPC Applies To Election Petitions Only Subject To RP Act; 'Proper Parties' Cannot Be Added Beyond Statute: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: Harsh Dev Singh Vs UT of J&K & Ors.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 161

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court held that the procedure prescribed under the Code of Civil Procedure is applicable to the trial of election petitions only, subject to the provisions of the Representation of the People Act, 1951. The Court clarified that anything contained in the CPC which is contrary to the provisions of the Act of 1951 cannot be made applicable to the trial of election petitions.

Interim Compensation U/S 143A NI Act Discretionary; Cannot Be Granted Mechanically: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: Nargees Javaid v. Ghulam Jeelani Nengroo

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 162

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh held that the power to grant interim compensation under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, is discretionary in nature and cannot be exercised in a routine or mechanical manner without recording reasons and undertaking a prima facie evaluation of the case.

J&K&L High Court Grants Bail To Former MLA, Councillor In Ladakh Protest FIR After Seven Months' Custody

Case Title: Smanla Dorje Nurboo v. Union Territory of Ladakh a/w Deldan Namgail v. Union Territory of Ladakh

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 163

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh granted bail to a former MLA and an LAHDC councillor accused in connection with the Ladakh protest incident, holding that continued incarceration was not warranted in the facts of the case.

General Land Register Entries Not Conclusive Proof Of Title, Cannot Override Revenue Records Or Natural Justice: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: Ghulam Nabi Bhat & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 164

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh held that entries in the General Land Register (GLR) do not carry probative value where such records are prepared without affording an opportunity of hearing to affected persons, and cannot be treated as conclusive proof of title over land.

NIA Act | Special Court Must Transfer Case To Regular Criminal Court If No Scheduled Offence Is Found After Cognisance: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: UT of J&K Vs Sameer Ahmad Bhat & Ors.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 165

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court held that where even after taking cognizance of offences, a Special Court finds that no scheduled offence is made out against the accused, the case must be transferred to the normal criminal court in terms of Section 20 of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008.

“Writ Jurisdiction Cannot Be Permitted To Be Abused”: J&K&L High Court Imposes ₹50K Cost For Suppression Of Material Facts

Case Title: Ghulam Mohammad Sheikh & Ors. v. Gulzar Ahmad Sheikh & Ors.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 166

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court dismissed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution with costs of ₹50,000, holding that the petitioners had approached the Court with tainted hands by suppressing material facts, including the fact that the trial court had already stayed the execution of the impugned order at their own instance. The Court reiterated that the writ jurisdiction cannot be permitted to be invoked as an instrument of abuse or to perpetuate unfair advantage.

Judicial Grace In Addressing Bar Is Non-Negotiable; Courts Must Moderate Tone & Temper, Especially With Senior Advocates: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: Sanjay Kumar & Anr. Vs Mohan Singh & Anr

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 167

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court reminded trial courts that the propriety of judicial conduct and temper in addressing the Bar is a non-negotiable aspect of judicial grace, particularly when senior advocates with long-standing experience and due sense of responsibility are representing litigants. The Court observed that a court is supposed to moderate its tone and tenor when dealing with such members of the Bar.

J&K&L High Court Upholds Detention Of Alleged OGW, Says Contact With Pakistani Terror Handler Shows Continuing Threat

Case Title: Ahsan ul Haq Khanday v. UT of J&K & Ors.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 168

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh upheld a preventive detention order under the Public Safety Act, 1978, holding that continued involvement of the detenue as an Over Ground Worker (OGW) for terrorist outfits, including The Resistance Front (TRF), coupled with communication with a Pakistani handler through Dark Web applications, demonstrates a sustained threat to the security of the Union Territory and renders the plea of stale grounds untenable.

Recruitment Process Cannot Be Scrapped Solely Over Non-Issuance Of EOI While Engaging Exam-Conducting Agency: J&K&L High Court

Case Title: UT of J&K v. Sameer Ahmad Khan & Ors.

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 169

The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh held that a recruitment process cannot be scrapped solely on the ground of non-issuance of a Request for Proposal (RFP) or Expression of Interest (EOI) in the engagement of an examination-conducting agency, particularly when the process has reached an advanced stage, and no irregularity is alleged in the conduct of the examination.

J&K&L High Court Upholds Posthumous Regularisation Of Employee Who Served 21 Years, Says Accrued Rights Cannot Be Defeated By Repeal Of Law

Case Title: UT of J&K & Ors. Vs Sara Begum

Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 170

The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court held that a right accrued to a deceased employee cannot be taken away retrospectively, and the repeal of an Act or Rule cannot be applied to defeat a right that had crystallized under the repealed Act, more so when such action amounts to violation of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India.