Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh High Court Weekly Round-Up : January 19-January 25, 2026

Nominal Index:YASIR AMIN KHANDAY AND ANOTHER Vs UT Of J&K 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 19Abdul Hamid Wani Vs Abdul Hamid Lone 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 20Dinesh Singh Chib & Ors Vs UT Of J&K 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 21Ishant Sharma v. Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir & Ors LiveLaw 2026 (JKL) 22Shrisht Pal Sharma v. Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 23Jasveer Singh and others vs Jugal Kishore 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 24MOHAMMAD SHAIF BHAT ALIAS WANI & ANR Vs. RAFI AHMAD BHAT ALIAS WANI AND ORS 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 25Arfaz Mehboob Tak v. Union of India 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 26Judgments/Orders:S. 309 CrPC | Timeline For Rape Trials Is To Ensure 'Speedy Justice' For Victim, Can't Be Leveraged For Automatic Bail: J&K&L High CourtCase Title: YASIR AMIN KHANDAY AND ANOTHER Vs UT Of J&KCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 19Emphasizing victim protection over procedural shortcuts for the accused, the High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh held that the timeline mandated under the proviso to Section 309 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) is designed to deliver speedy justice to victims and cannot be invoked to grant automatic bail to the accused merely due to a delay in completing the trial.Material Alteration By Cheque Drawer To Defeat Payment Attracts S. 138 NI Act; 'Who Altered' Is A Triable Issue: J&K&L High CourtCase Title: Abdul Hamid Wani Vs Abdul Hamid LoneCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 20Emphasising that a material alteration in a cheque does not, by itself, absolve the accused of criminal liability, the Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court held that the decisive factor under the Negotiable Instruments Act is not the mere presence of an alteration, but the identity of the person who made it.Remedy Lies Before CAT: J&K&L High Court Rejects Over-Age SI Aspirants' Plea; Cites Rigours Of Administrative Tribunals ActCase Title: Dinesh Singh Chib & Ors Vs UT Of J&KCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 21Delineating the limits of judicial review in recruitment matters, the Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court dismissed two clubbed writ petitions seeking age relaxation for participation in a fresh recruitment process for the post of Sub-Inspector in the J&K Police.'Penal Liability Doesn't Pass On To Legal Heirs': J&K&L High Court Quashes Suspension Of Employee Over Father's Corruption CaseCase Title: Ishant Sharma v. Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir & Ors.Citation: LiveLaw 2026 (JKL) 22The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court held that the suspension of a government employee solely on the basis of criminal proceedings pending against his father is impermissible in law, as penal liability cannot be inherited by legal heirs.Employer Can't Revise Service Book Post-Retirement To Cover Up Own Lapses: J&K&L High Court Quashes Recovery From RetireeCase Title: Shrisht Pal Sharma v. Union Territory of Jammu & Kashmir & Ors.Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 23The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court held that an employer cannot revise service records post-retirement to the prejudice of an employee in order to cover up its own lapses, especially when the employee was not responsible for maintaining the service book and the issue stood settled by an earlier judgment of the Court.S. 223 BNSS | Pre-Cognizance Hearing Not Mandatory For S. 138 NI Act Proceedings: J&K&L High CourtCase-Title: Jasveer Singh and others vs Jugal KishoreCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 24The Jammu & Kashmir High Court dismissed a petition seeking the quashing of proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, ruling that the requirement of hearing the accused at the pre-cognisance stage under Section 223 BNSS stands dispensed with for cheque dishonour cases.Suit Proceeds De Novo Upon Return Of Plaint; Proceedings Before Court Lacking Jurisdiction Are Non-Est: J&K&L High CourtCase Title: MOHAMMAD SHAIF BHAT ALIAS WANI & ANR Vs. RAFI AHMAD BHAT ALIAS WANI AND ORS.Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 25The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court clarified that once a plaint is returned by a court for lack of jurisdiction, the entire suit must commence de novo before the competent court, even if evidence of the parties stood concluded before the court which returned the plaint.S. 37 NDPS Act | 'Reasonable Grounds' Not Equivalent To 'Proved' Under BSA; It Would Set At Naught Bail Power: J&K&L High CourtCase Title: Arfaz Mehboob Tak v. Union of IndiaCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 26Interpreting the stringent bail provisions under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act (NDPS Act), the Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court clarified that the expression “reasonable grounds” contained in Section 37 cannot be stretched to mean 'proved' under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam.

Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh High Court Weekly Round-Up : January 19-January 25, 2026

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh High Court Weekly Round-Up : January 19-January 25, 2026

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers