Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh High Court Weekly Roundup: July 13 - July 19, 2026

Nominal Index:Adan Bashir Bangroo and Another v. Union Territory of J&K 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 296Mudasir Ahmad Mir v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 297Gazetted Aspirants, Residents of Ladakh v. Union Territory of Ladakh 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 298Abdul Gani Ganie and Another v. Abdul Gani Bhat 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 299Gulla Ganaie @ Gulzar Ahmad Ganaie v. Ghulam Qadir Sheikh 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 300Amir Ahmad Wani v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 301Aijaz Ahmad Bhat v. Nisar Ahmad Malik 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 302Dr. Sonakshi Gupta & Ors. v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 303Vineet Jain v. Aman Zargar 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 304Ali Haider Shah v. Union Territory of J&K & Anr 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 305Yavnika alias Anshu v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 306Adnan Rasool Ganie v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 307Judgments/Orders: Posters Allegedly Seeking To Alienate J&K Residents From India Sufficient To Frame UAPA Charge Against Accused: J&K&L High CourtCase Title: Adan Bashir Bangroo and Another v. Union Territory of J&KCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 296The Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court held that posters allegedly seeking to alienate the residents of Jammu & Kashmir from the rest of India are, at the stage of framing of charges, sufficient to prima facie attract an offence under Section 13 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967.J&K&L High Court Quashes Preventive Detention, Pulls Up Home Department For Failing To Produce Complete Detention RecordCase Title: Mudasir Ahmad Mir v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors.Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 297The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh strongly deprecated the casual manner in which the Home Department produced the detention record in a habeas corpus petition, observing that the constitutional obligation to place the entire detention record before the Court cannot be discharged by merely forwarding photocopies through a clerk without proper verification by the competent authority.J&K&L High Court Closes PIL As Ladakh Administration Establishes Recruitment Framework For Gazetted PostsCase Title: Gazetted Aspirants, Residents of Ladakh v. Union Territory of LadakhCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 298The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh closed a Public Interest Litigation concerning non-recruitment to gazetted posts in the Union Territory of Ladakh, after the respondent authorities filed a status report stating that the grievance had been completely redressed.Unamended Pleading Loses Efficacy Once Amendment Is Allowed; Party Cannot Capitalise On Its Own Default: J&K&L High CourtCase Title: Abdul Gani Ganie and Another v. Abdul Gani BhatCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 299The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court held that once an application for amendment is allowed and a direction is issued to file a fresh application within specified time, the unamended pleading loses its efficacy for adjudication.Section 138 NI Act Settlement Can't Be Enforced Through CrPC Recovery Unless Incorporated In Court Order: J&K&L High CourtCase Title: Gulla Ganaie @ Gulzar Ahmad Ganaie v. Ghulam Qadir SheikhCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 300The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh held that a settlement entered into between parties in proceedings under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act does not, by itself, become enforceable through the coercive recovery mechanism provided under Sections 421 and 431 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC).Illegal Mining Cannot Be Labelled As Threat To Public Order To Justify Preventive Detention: J&K&L High CourtCase Title: Amir Ahmad Wani v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors.Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 301The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh held that repeated involvement in illegal mining activities, even if brazen and in persistent violation of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, cannot, by itself, be treated as conduct prejudicial to the maintenance of "public order" so as to justify preventive detention under the Jammu & Kashmir Public Safety Act, 1978.Accused Cannot Flag Non-Compliance Of S.202 CrPC To Scuttle Cheque Bounce Proceedings At Stage Of Final Arguments: J&K&L High CourtCase Title: Aijaz Ahmad Bhat v. Nisar Ahmad MalikCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL) 302The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh held that although an inquiry under Section 202 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (corresponding to Section 225 of the BNSS) is mandatory before issuance of process where the accused resides beyond the territorial jurisdiction of the Magistrate, non-compliance with that requirement cannot be invoked to derail proceedings after both parties have led their evidence and the case has reached the stage of final arguments."Maternity Leave Is Constitutional Right, Not State Charity": J&K&L High Court Quashes Order Denying Salary To DoctorsCase Title: Dr. Sonakshi Gupta & Ors. v. Union Territory of J&K & Ors.Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (JKL)...

Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh High Court Weekly Roundup: July 13 - July 19, 2026

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh High Court Weekly Roundup: July 13 - July 19, 2026

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers