Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh High Court Weekly Roundup March 31 - April 6, 2025

Nominal Index:M/s Devyani International Limited vs Airport Authority of India and others 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 127Rattan Chand & Ors vs UT OF J&K & ORS 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 128Mohd Iqbal Koka Vs UT Of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 129Mohammad Imran Ganai And Anr. Vs Government Through Police Station Dangiwacha 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 130Chief Engineer PW(R&B) Department and another vs M/s Abdul Salam Mir 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 131Dr. Rajeev Gupta vs U.T. of Jammu & Kashmir & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 132Dogra Sangathan Vs State of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 133Javaid Ahmad Bhat Vs UT Of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 134UT Of J&K Vs Ghulam Nabi Itoo & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 135UT of J&K through its Commissioner vs Kashmiri Lal 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 136Adil Hussain Mir vs UT of JK and others 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 137Judgments/Orders:No Absolute Right To Bypass Mandatory Pre-Litigation Mediation By Seeking Urgent Interim Relief Without Reasonable Grounds: J&K High CourtCase-Title: M/s Devyani International Limited vs Airport Authority of India and othersCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 127The Jammu and Kashmir High Court held that under the Commercial Courts Act, a party does not have an absolute choice to bypass the statutorily mandated pre-litigation mediation by praying for interim relief without justifying the same with reasonable grounds.Publishing Notice Only In English Newspaper Without Giving Mandatory Notice In Regional Language Vitiates Land Acquisition Proceedings: J&K HCCase-Title:- Rattan Chand & Ors vs UT OF J&K & ORSCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 128The Jammu and Kashmir High Court ruled that not publishing the notices as provided under the land acquisition Act for the benefit of the occupants of the land by publishing the notices in local language at conspicuous places vitiates the entire acquisition proceedings.Failure To Communicate Rejection Of Detenue's Representation In Time Vitiates Detention Order: J&K High CourtCase Title: Mohd Iqbal Koka Vs UT Of J&KCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 129Emphasizing the importance of procedural safeguards in preventive detention cases, the Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court ruled that the government's failure to communicate the rejection of a detenue's representation in a time-bound manner is sufficient to vitiate the detention order.Plea Of Non-Compliance With S.154 CrPC Need Not Be Looked At When Chargesheet Is Filed Disclosing Commission Of Offence: J&K High CourtCase-Title: Mohammad Imran Ganai And Anr. Vs Government Through Police Station DangiwachaCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 130The Jammu and Kashmir High Court observed that the requirement of checking the non-compliance of the provisions of section 154 CrPC was not needed at the stage when the investigation in the matter was complete and chargesheet had already been filed disclosing the commission of the cognizable offence.Delay In Receiving Award Due To Default In Paying Arbitral Fees Cannot Be Held Against Party Seeking To Challenge Award While Calculating Limitation: J&K HCCase-Title: Chief Engineer PW(R&B) Department and another vs M/s Abdul Salam MirCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 131The Jammu and Kashmir High Court held that since the delivery of a signed copy of the arbitral award was the mandatory requirement under the arbitration act therefore, the limitation for challenging the said award would arise only after the said signed copy is received by the party seeking to challenge the same.PSC Has No Locus To Defend Selection Process When Candidate Whose Appointment Was Set Aside By CAT Chose Not To Agitate Matter: J&K High CourtCase-Title: Dr. Rajeev Gupta vs U.T. of Jammu & Kashmir & OrsCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 132The Jammu and Kashmir High Court dismissed a review petition filed by the J&K Public Service Commission, holding that a constitutional body had no locus standi in defending a selection which was set aside by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), considering the fact that the candidate whose appointment was set aside had not bothered to agitate the issue."No Evidence Of Illegal Activities": J&K High Court Dismisses PIL Alleging Exploitation Of Women, Illegal Acts At Adhyatmik Vishva VidyalayaCase Title: Dogra Sangathan Vs State of J&KCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 133The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh dismissed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) alleging illegal activities, including exploitation and confinement of women, at the centres of Adhyatmik Vishva Vidyalaya run by spiritual leader Virender Dev Dikshit.The bench, comprising Chief Justice Tashi Rabstan and Justice M A Chowdhary concluded that the petition lacked merit after a thorough investigation by multiple committees and senior government officials.J&K High Court Denies Bail To Hotelier Who Allegedly Harbored Foreign Terrorists, Provided Them SIM CardsCase Title: Javaid Ahmad Bhat Vs UT Of J&KCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 134The Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh High Court dismissed the bail plea of Javaid Ahmad Bhat, a Srinagar-based hotelier accused of...

Jammu & Kashmir And Ladakh High Court Weekly Roundup March 31 - April 6, 2025

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

Tags