J&K High Court Weekly Round-Up: July 7 To July 13, 2025

Nominal Index:Mohd Khalil Qazi Vs State of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 252M/S Durga Enterprises Vs FCI & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 253Maan Chand vs State 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 254Parveen Begum vs UT of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 255MUSHTAQ AHMAD SHAH & ORS vs UNIVERSITY OF KASHMIR 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 256UT Of J&K & ORS VS MRS. RAJINDER OBEROI 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 257WASEEM QURESHI vs STATE OF J&K AND ANOTHER 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 258Sushant Khajuria Vs J&K Bank 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 259ASIF AMIN CHALKOO & ORS vs UT of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 260UNION TERRITORY OF J&K AND ORS. VS SALEEMA BEGUM & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 261Abdul Aziz Reshi Vs UT Of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 262U.T. OF J&K vs SHAKEEL AHMAD BHAT 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 263Naveed Bashir Wani Vs Varqa Bashir & Ors 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 264Iqbal Singh vs Pankaj Sharma 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 265Dr Noor Mohammad Bilal Vs UT Of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 266IQBAL MUBARIK Vs UT of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 267M/S PMT Industries Vs UT Of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 268Met Life India Insurance Company Ltd vs Abdul Aziz Khan 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 269Peerzada Muneer Ahmad vs Aaliya Anjum 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 270Syed Jameel Qaiser & Ors Vs J&K State Cable Car Corp 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 271MOHAMMAD AKBAR SHEIKH vs MST JANA AND ORS 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 272Amir Medical Store Vs UT Of J&K 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 273Judgments/Orders: Voluntarily Acquiring Citizenship Of Pakistan Resulted In Termination Of Indian Citizenship: J&K High Court Upholds Deportation OrderCase Title: Mohd Khalil Qazi Vs State of J&KCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 252The High Court of Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh, while dismissing a 34-year-old writ petition challenging deportation orders, held that "The petitioners have acted in their own volition and acquired the citizenship of a foreign Country. Their passports and the residential permit issued in their favour are cogent, unequivocal evidence of the fact that the petitioners are not citizens of India and, as such, orders to deport them were valid."J&K High Court Directs FCI To Refund Almost ₹8 Lakh To Transport Contractor, Says Retrospective Recovery Based On Revised Route Is IllegalCase Title: M/S Durga Enterprises Vs FCI & OrsCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 253The High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh directed the Food Corporation of India (FCI) to refund an amount of ₹7,93,456 to a transport contractor, M/s Durga Enterprises, after holding that recoveries made retrospectively based on revised route distances were illegal and contrary to contractual terms and policy guidelines.J&K HC Acquits Man Accused Of Killing Wife By Setting Bed Ablaze, Says It Was Unexplained Why He Didn't Save His Son If He Was Present At SceneCase-Title: Maan Chand vs StateCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 254The Jammu & Kashmir High Court acquitted a man convicted for murder, pointing to multiple shortcomings in the prosecution's case, including variations and contradictions in the initial report and testimony of key witnesses and conflicting accounts of the type of weapons used, the manner of assault, and nature of injuries.HC Cannot Order Re-Investigation Until Trial Court Decides On Whether Probe Is Tainted Or Not, Causes Prejudice To Accused: J&K High CourtCase-Title: Parveen Begum vs UT of J&KCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 255The Jammu & Kashmir High Court refused to entertain a writ petition seeking reinvestigation or alteration of charges in an alleged assault and disrobing case, directing the petitioner to pursue remedies before the trial court.A bench of Justice Sanjay Parihar observed that the petitioner had an adequate opportunity before the trial court to raise her grievances, and that writ jurisdiction cannot be invoked unless a manifest error or miscarriage of justice is established.Kashmir University Doing Great Disservice To Students By Hiring Guest Faculty To Circumvent Need For Contracutal Teachers: J&K High CourtCase-Title: MUSHTAQ AHMAD SHAH & ORS vs UNIVERSITY OF KASHMIRCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 256The Jammu & Kashmir High Court delivered a judgment reinforcing the legal principle that “one ad hoc arrangement cannot be replaced by another of similar nature,” and criticised the University of Kashmir for replacing contractual faculty with visiting and guest lecturers.J&K High Court Upholds Arbitral Award Of ₹1.37 Crore To Entrepreneur Whose Gulmarg Hotel's Lease Was Illegally Terminated By GovtCase-Title: UT Of J&K & ORS VS MRS. RAJINDER OBEROICitation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 257The Jammu & Kashmir High Court upheld Rs. 1.37 crore in compensation to a woman entrepreneur whose hotel lease was wrongfully cancelled, stating that illegal termination of lease resulted in losses to the extent of Rs.1,37,57,009/.J&K High Court Quashes Embezzlement Case Against Ex-Head Of SMHS Hospital, Says Expenditure Was 'Motivated By Patient Care & Exigency'Case-Title: WASEEM QURESHI vs STATE OF J&K AND ANOTHERCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (JKL) 258In granting relief to a former Medical Superintendent of SMHS Hospital, Srinagar, the Jammu & ...

J&K High Court Weekly Round-Up: July 7 To July 13, 2025

LIVELAW NEWS NETWORK

Tags