Jharkhand High Court
Jharkhand High Court Denies Bail in Rs 781.39 Crore GST Fraud Case Involving Fake Firms and Bogus Invoices
The Jharkhand High Court has rejected the bail application of a man involved in a massive GST fraud case of Rs. 781.39 crores and accused of orchestrating a large-scale fake GST invoice scam.The accused, Sumit Gupta, alleged to be the mastermind behind the creation and operation of 135 bogus firms, was charged with causing a massive financial loss of Rs. 781.39 crores to the government...
Jharkhand High Court Weekly Roundup: July 29 - August 4, 2024
Nominal Index [Citations: 2023 LiveLaw (Jha) 125-134]Khageshwar Rana V. Smt. Sundri Devi 2024 LiveLaw (Jha) 125Mahendra Prasad Singh V. Ratan Ram 2024 LiveLaw (Jha) 126Noor Islam vs The State of Jharkhand 2024 LiveLaw (Jha) 127 Mosomat Dukho Orain V. Sheikh Khalil 2024 LiveLaw (Jha) 128M/s Aditya Enterprises and Ors vs The State of Jharkhand and Ors 2024 LiveLaw (Jha) 129Mithun Nonia @...
[S.90 Evidence Act] Mere Age Of Document Not Conclusive Proof Of Its Execution, Prima Facie Evidence Required: Jharkhand High Court
The Jharkhand High Court has clarified that the mere age of a document does not serve as conclusive proof of its due execution. The Court emphasised that prima facie proof is necessary to establish that a document is thirty years old to raise a presumption under Section 90 of The Indian Evidence Act, 1872, though this presumption remains rebuttable. Justice Gautam Kumar Choudhary...
Defence Of Accused Cannot Be Looked Into While Considering His Discharge Petition: Jharkhand High Court Reiterates
The Jharkhand High Court has reiterated that the defense of the accused cannot be considered when considering a discharge petition.Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, who presided over the case, remarked, "It appears that the points raised as a basis of discharge of the petitioners pertains to their defence in the case. The truth or falsify of the case could be decided only at the trial...
Difficult To Enforce Unrealistically High Maintenance Amount To Be Paid By Spouse Employed In Unorganized Sector: Jharkhand High Court
The Jharkhand High Court has held that awarding unrealistically high maintenance in cases involving individuals employed in the unorganised sector can lead to difficulties in realising the maintenance amount.In the case at hand, an order of maintenance was passed, awarding Rs. 3000/- to the wife of the petitioner and Rs. 1000/- each to his three children. A criminal revision petition was...
Mere Breach Of Contract Does Not Constitute Criminal Breach Of Trust U/S 405 IPC Without 'Entrustment': Jharkhand High Court
The Jharkhand High Court has held that a mere breach of contract does not constitute an offence under Section 405 of the Indian Penal Code without the presence of 'entrustment'. The provision penalises criminal breach of trust.Justice Sanjay Dwivedi observed, “Offence of criminal breach of trust has been defined under section 405 I.P.C. and same is punishable under section 406 I.P.C. In...
Irregularity In Test Identification Parade Does Not Erode Evidentiary Value Of Identification In Court: Jharkhand High Court
The Jharkhand High Court has clarified that Test Identification Parade (TIP) conducted during the investigation is part of the investigative process and does not constitute substantive evidence. Thus, it emphasised that irregularities in conducting TIP is not a sufficient ground to discard the prosecution's case, if supported by other credible evidence.Justice Gautam Kumar Choudhary,...
Deputy Commissioner Lacks Power To Initiate Confiscation Proceeding: Jharkhand High Court Declares Rule 11(V) Ultra Vires To Mines & Minerals Act
The Jharkhand High Court has ruled that Deputy Commissioners in each district lack the authority to initiate and decide confiscation proceedings under the Jharkhand Mineral (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transport and Storage) Rules, 2017.This decision, made by a division bench comprising Justice Anand Sen and Justice Subhash Chand, deems Rule 11(V) of the Jharkhand Mineral Rules, 2017, as...
High Court Grants Interim Bail To Accused In Transit Remand Arrested In Uttar Pradesh By Jharkhand Police
The Jharkhand High Court has granted interim bail to an accused who was in transit remand following an arrest by the Jharkhand Police in Bareilly, Uttar Pradesh. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, who presided over the case, noted the circumstances of the arrest and determined that releasing the petitioner on interim bail was justifiable for the sake of justice. “The way, by which, the...
'Unshaken Testimony': Jharkhand High Court Confirms Murder Conviction Despite Trial Court Not Questioning 11-Yr-Old Witness' Competency
The Jharkhand High Court has upheld the conviction of a man for the murder of his wife, despite the trial court's failure to verify the competency of an eleven-year-old child witness. The High Court presided over by the division bench of Justices Ananda Sen and Subhash Chand, noted that Jasmira Khatoon's testimony remained rational and consistent even though the trial court did not evaluate...
O.VIII R.1 CPC | Filing Written Statement Within Maximum Period Of 90 Days Is Directory Not Mandatory: Jharkhand High Court
The Jharkhand High Court has ruled on the procedural aspect of filing written statements under Order VIII Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC), emphasising that the time limits prescribed are meant to expedite proceedings rather than obstruct them. The Court clarified that while the standard time frame for filing a written statement is 30 days from the service of notice, the trial court...
Execution Of Sale Deed Must Be Proved By Witnesses Or Parties Before Being Marked As Exhibit In Trial: Jharkhand High Court
The Jharkhand High Court has held that while a sale deed is initially a private document, it becomes a public document upon registration with the Registrar. However, for the sale deed to be marked as exhibited in a trial, its execution must be proven by witnesses or parties involved in the sale deed.Justice Subhash Chand presiding over the case observed, “The sale deed is the private...



![[S.90 Evidence Act] Mere Age Of Document Not Conclusive Proof Of Its Execution, Prima Facie Evidence Required: Jharkhand High Court [S.90 Evidence Act] Mere Age Of Document Not Conclusive Proof Of Its Execution, Prima Facie Evidence Required: Jharkhand High Court](https://www.livelaw.in/h-upload/2020/01/20/500x300_369297-evidence-act.jpg)



