'Welfare Of Child Paramount': Karnataka HC Directs Passport Renewal For Minor Taekwondo Champion Without Estranged Father's Signature

The writ petition was filed by a 16-year-old minor who is a class X student at a private school in Bengaluru, seeking the renewal of her passport for an International Taekwondo Competition in China in April 2026.

“…The insistence on the father's signature, in the peculiar facts of the present case, would amount to adopting a hyper-technical approach, which would defeat the larger interest of the minor child….", the court held.

The single-judge bench of Justice Sachin Shankar Magadum clarified that the court can't approve such an approach of the passport authorities that impedes the aspirations of the minor athlete. The passport authorities had earlier cited Clause (4) of the Form prescribed under Annexure-D[Declaration of Parent/Guardian for Minor Passports ].

Visitation rights of the estranged father cannot be placed above the child's attempts to improve herself and bring the nation recognition through her sport, the court opined.

“…The paramount consideration in matters concerning minors is their welfare, development and best interests. The petitioner, at a young and impressionable age, has already demonstrated exceptional talent in sports and has earned the opportunity to represent the country at an international level Denial of passport renewal on technical grounds would not only impede her immediate participation in the scheduled event but would also have a demoralising effect on her growth as an athlete”, the court observed in the order.

The parents of the minor, through a divorce by mutual consent, had separated from each other in 2025. The compromise decree drawn upon the culmination of mutual divorce granted the permanent custody of the minor to her mother, through whom the former has filed the current writ.

According to the compromise decree, the father only has limited visitation rights. Upon the minor's selection for the sports event, the mother informed the father about the signature/consent requirement insisted upon by the Koramangala Passport authority for renewal.

However, the petitioner submitted that despite her mother's continued efforts, the father did not revert to her request, which the court duly took note of.

Considering the factual circumstances, the court opined that the international athlete couldn't be made to suffer on account of her father's inaction. Hence, the court laid down in the order as follows:

"…The father's rights, being in the nature of visitation, cannot override the legitimate aspirations and opportunities available to the minor child, particularly when such opportunities contribute to her holistic development and bring recognition to the nation….".

The court also opined that a one-week journey for a sports event wouldn't adversely affect the visitation rights of the father as laid down in the compromise decree. The court, hence, directed the passport authority to renew the minor's passport without the signature of her father.

“…The respondent-Authorities, in the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, cannot insist upon the consent or signature of the father as a precondition for renewal of the petitioner's passport. Such insistence would be contrary to the welfare of the minor child and detrimental to her right to participate in a sporting event representing the country,”, the court highlighted.

Additionally, the court also directed the teenager's mother to furnish all requisite documents for renewal within a period of three working days. The mother has also been asked to file an affidavit to the effect that the minor's travel would be limited to her participation in the Taekwondo event in China, along with the details of the specific event.

Accordingly, the court allowed the plea of the 16-year-old athlete.

Case No: WP No. 8072/2026

Click Here To Read/ Download Order