Karnataka High Court Monthly Digest: April 2025

Citation No: 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 127 to 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 160Nominal Index:Sanath Kumar Shetty & Others AND Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 127Sabeer & Others AND State of Karnataka & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 128Mahendra Kumar Mitra AND State of Karnataka & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 129ROPEEN TRANSPORTATION SERVICES PVT LTD AND State of Karnataka & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 130Samiulla Khan & Others AND Sirajuddin Macci. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 131M/S. MAHA RASHTRA APEX CORPORATION LTD Versus SRI. P.K.MOHAMMED and Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 132SRI JAGADGURU BASAVA JAYMRITYUNJAY SWAMIJI & others AND State of Karnataka & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 133Mahalaxmi AND Karnataka Public Service Commission & ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 134S Basavaraj AND Bar Council of India & ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 135H T Umesh & Others AND State of Karnataka & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 136State of Karnataka AND B G Prakash Kumar & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 137Amit Garg AND Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority & ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 138The Union Of India and Anr. Versus Sri. Kothari Subbaraju. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 139M/s Fortious Infradevelopers LLP V. The Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 140Citation No: 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 141 to Citation No: 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 146THE MYSORE EDUCATION SOCIETY & ANR AND Babu P & ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 141Divisional Controller AND Shyamala B. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 142Dr A A Muralidharswamy And State of Karnataka & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 143J Ramesh AND M/s Lakshmi Precious Jewellery Private Ltd.. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 144Dr S Chandrakala AND State of Karnataka & ANR . 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 145P. Junjappa v. Principal Chief Conservator Of Forests & Ors. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 146Sumitra AND State of Karnataka & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 147Rudramma & OthersState of Karnataka & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 148K V Shankara And Siddaramiah. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 149K Ganesh Babu AND State of Karnataka & ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 150Harshavardini Ranya Rao AND Directorate of Revenue Intelligence. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 151Shiv Kumar AND State of Karnataka & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 152High Court Legal Services Authority AND Principal Secretary & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 153Hemanth Datta @Hemantha AND State of Karnataka. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 154Prof Govindan Rangarajan & Others AND Dr D Sanna Durgappa & ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 155Newspace Research And Technologies Private Limited AND State of Karnataka & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 156Puttanagowda AND Kubergouda. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 157Dr Madhukar G Anagur AND State of Karnataka & ANR. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 158M MOSER DESIGN ASSOCIATES INDIA PVT LTD AND State of Karnataka & Others. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 159NEIL PATEL DIGITAL LLC Vs. PRADEEP KUMAR RAJARATHINAM. 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 160Judgments/OrdersKarnataka High Court Rejects PIL Questioning Fare Hike In Bengaluru Metro, Says Administration Has PowerCase Title: Sanath Kumar Shetty & Others AND Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited & OthersCase No: WP 9077/2025Citation No: 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 127The Karnataka High Court on Tuesday (April 1) dismissed a public interest litigation questioning the fare hike in Bengaluru Metro also known as 'Namma Metro'.A division bench of Chief Justice N V Anjaria and Justice K V Aravind dismissed the petition filed by Sanath Kumar Shetty, an automobile engineer who works in a private company.The bench on going through the averments in the petition and considering the submission said, “As far as present subject matter of fare increase is, the same is done under Section 33 of the Act. Thus, it is evident from the aforesaid section that Metro administration is empowered to fix the fare from time to time and the task is done by a fare fixation committee.”Karnataka HC Asks Authorities To Ensure Smooth Movement Of Traffic And Pedestrians During Ramzan, Other Festive OccasionsCase Title: Sabeer & Others AND State of Karnataka & OthersCase No: WP 8783/2025Citation No: 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 128The Karnataka High Court has directed the Municipal Corporation, Police Commissioner and all other authorities concerned to ensure the smooth movement of traffic on the road and on the footpath so as not to adversely affect the vehicular, pedestrian and public movement, during the ongoing festivities of Ramzan and other festive occasions.A division bench of Chief Justice N V Anjaria and Justice K V Aravind directed thus while refusing to entertain a public interest litigation by one Sabeer and others, who had pointed about encroachment in the public spaces in certain areas of the city of Bengaluru.Karnataka HC Refuses To Entertain Plea To Implement 2020 Govt Circular Asking All Departments To Avoid Using 'Dalit' To Address SC MembersCase Title: Mahendra Kumar Mitra AND State of Karnataka & OthersCase No: WP 200451/2025.Citation No: 2025 LiveLaw (Kar) 129The Karnataka High Court on Wednesday (April 2) refused to entertain a petition filed seeking to...

Karnataka High Court Monthly Digest: April 2025

Mustafa Plumber

Tags