Karnataka High Court Monthly Digest - May 2023 [Citations: 165 To 197]

Nominal IndexCentral Public Information Officer/Deputy Director General, Doordarshan Kendra And Central Information Commission & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 165D K Shivakumar And State of Karnataka. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 166D B Jatti And M/s Jamnadas Devidas. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 167Ravi M And Union of India & others. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 168B Prashanth Hegde And State of Karnataka. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 169ABC And XYZ. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 170Karnataka Golf Association And Karnataka Information Commission & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 171N P Amruthesh And State of Karnataka & Others. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 172Dilshad And Athaulla Khan & others. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 173Emmanuel Michael And Union of India. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 174Gameskraft Technologies Private Limited Versus Directorate General Of Goods. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 175Vinod Damji Patel And The Hoskote Yojana Pradhikara & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 176Gajaraja And State of Karnataka & Others. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 177Social Democratic Party of India And Union of India & Others. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 178ABC And XYZ. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 179Sri Jagadguru Murugharajendra Vidhya Peetha & ANR And The Chief Secretary & others. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 180Siddappa B H And The State By Lokayukta Police. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 181ABC And XYZ. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 182Karnataka General Labour Union And Government of India & others. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 183Gangamma & ANR And Pratibha & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 184C Manjunath And State of Karnataka & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 185Sharnavva @Kasturi and Shivappa. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 186Raman Sundaresan And Joint Secretary, Ministry of External Affairs & Others. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 187Blink Commerce Private Limited And Blinkhit Private Limited. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 188Town Essentials Pvt. Ltd. v. Daily Ninja Delivery Services Pvt. Ltd. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 189NG & others And State of Karnataka & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 190Reeth Abraham And Sunil Abraham. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 191G Jagadish Kumar And K G Murali. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 192Prasad A A And State of Karnataka & ANR. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 193Gurushree High-Tech Multi Speciality Hospital And Commissioner For Health And Family Welfare And Chairman Appellate Authority & Others. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 194N P Amrutesh And Union of India & Others. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 195Karnataka State Level Advocates Clerks Association And State of Karnataka & Others. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 196Rangaraju @ Vajapeyi And State of Karnataka. 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 197Judgments/OrdersRTI Act | Public Information Officer Cannot Challenge Appellate Authority's Order Directing It To Disclose Information: Karnataka High CourtCase Title: Central Public Information Officer/Deputy Director General, Doordarshan Kendra And Central Information Commission & ANR.Case NO: WRIT PETITION NO. 2346 OF 2011 (GM-RES) C/W WRIT PETITION NO. 663 OF 2011Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 165The Karnataka High Court has made it clear that under the Right to Information Act, a Public information Officer has no authority to prefer an appeal against an order passed by the Appellate Authority, directing him to furnish information to an applicant under the Act. The power to prefer an appeal challenging an order passed by the Appellate authority has been conferred only on the persons who had sought for information, it held.A single judge bench of Justice N S Sanjay Gowda has said, “There is no provision under the Act which enables any of the parties, let alone a Public Information Officer, to prefer an appeal against the order to the Second Appellate Authority.”[DK Shivakumar Disproportionate Assets Case] State's Consent For CBI Probe Merely Executive Order, Not Sanction For Prosecution: Karnataka High CourtCase Title: D K Shivakumar And State of KarnatakaCase No: WRIT PETITION NO.10479 OF 2020Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 166The Karnataka High Court last month dismissed a petition filed by Congress leader D K Shivakumar seeking to quash the sanction for prosecution granted by State to the CBI, to investigate the offences alleged against him under the provision of Prevention of Corruption Act.A single judge bench of Justice K Natarajan said the impugned order was merely a consent given by the State under Section 6 of the DSPE Act, "it is not a sanction as required under either Sections 19 or 17 of the Prevention of Corruption Act.”Section 87 NI Act | Cheque Not Invalid If Altered With Consent Of Drawer: Karnataka High CourtCase Title: D B Jatti And M/s Jamnadas DevidasCase No: CRL.R.P No. 964 OF 2019Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Kar) 167The Karnataka High Court has reiterated that if the payee or holder of the cheque had made alteration with the consent of drawer on cheque, such alteration cannot be a ground to resist right of payee or holder thereof.A single judge bench of Justice Rajendra Badamikar dismissed a revision petition filed by accused D B Jatti who had challenged the conviction order passed by the trial court for the offence under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, and upheld by the...

Karnataka High Court Monthly Digest - May 2023 [Citations: 165 To 197]

Mustafa Plumber

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Karnataka High Court Monthly Digest - May 2023 [Citations: 165 To 197]

Mustafa Plumber

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers