Kerala High Court Questions State On Monitoring Of Waste Collection Agencies, Suggests Stronger Audit And CSR Coordination

The Kerala High Court on Friday (July 10) orally raised concerns over the State's monitoring of empanelled waste collection agencies, questioning whether adequate government oversight exists to ensure that waste collected from households and institutions is ultimately processed and disposed of in accordance with the law.The Court also suggested better coordination for the dispersal of the Corporate Social Responsibility(CSR) Fund. The Division bench comprising Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas and Justice Gopinath P. was hearing suo-motu proceedings initiated in the aftermath of Brahmapuram fire, along with connected matters. The Principal Secretary of the Local Self Government Department (LSGD) appeared virtually to explain the State's monitoring mechanism.The Court had earlier questioned whether private agencies engaged for waste collection are properly disposing of the same. It had also directed the State to provide a list of agencies involved in the collection, transportation and processing of waste in the State The counsel appearing for the State submitted that the government has put in place a system of empanelment for waste handling agencies. It was stated that agencies seeking empanelment are required to furnish documents relating to waste collection and processing, while periodic data collection enables authorities to assess the quantity of waste collected and handled.“It is respectfully submitted that the Sichitwa mission has a mechanism in place to monitor empanelled agencies for the collection and disposal of waste. The empanelled conditions stipulates that the concerned agency possesses pollution control board registration, consent certificate, adequate modern facility, sufficient documents to prove the ownership of vehicles and GPS tracking facilities for the waste collected from the source along with the valid agreement with the end disposal facility. The applicant shall be inspected and verified by the Suchhitwa Mission officials. Empanelment is granted based on the finding of this verification Once the empanelment, the applicant shall also .. in the specified data collection data. In addition, the Suchitwa mission requires all the empanelment entity to submit an annual report on the quantity of waste collected at the end of March of .. year.” the State submitted. The Bench, however, orally said that while these procedures were already reflected in the records, its concern was whether there was effective monitoring after collection.The LSGD Principal Secretary informed the court that officials verify whether agencies possess valid processing facilities and maintain agreements with downstream processors, including cement factories where applicable.“We have a proper empanelment princess, during which a proper verification happens. On a monthly basis, they submit the report… regular .. The regular inspection clause do not cover the facilities.. The facilities are covered during the empanelment process and subsequently randomly in between the year also.. We also check whether there is a proper agreement that is being executed between the facility that is collecting the waste and the local body and transporting it… then a forward linkage with the supplier” the Principal Secretary submitted. The Secretary pointed out the details of such end-to-end arrangements, including agreements with processing facilities that are required to remain valid for at least two years.According to the State, the government also attempts to track waste movement through GPS-based monitoring and periodic inspections. However, the Principal Secretary acknowledged that monitoring remains challenging, particularly because of unauthorised operators and illegal dumping.The Bench orally questioned whether the existing regulatory framework was sufficient, observing that agencies receive payments for collecting waste and that the government must ensure the waste is actually processed instead of being dumped elsewhere.“do you think some sort of audit is due?.. Your affidavit says that you do it at the time of empanelment.. You have these agencies coming and collecting waste from individual households, from hospitals, various other sources which generates the waste...should it not then require a monitoring by the Government, Suchitwa Mission, to see what exactly these people are doing with the waste,” the Court said.The court suggested that the State can consider conducting some form of audit of empanelled agencies. It said that if agencies collect user charges without scientifically treating or disposing of the waste, substantial amounts of money could be collected without achieving the intended environmental objectives.The Court also mentioned about the continued dumping of waste along the road connecting Willingdon Island and Maradu, despite the presence of major public sector and industrial establishments such as BPCL.It suggested that the State Government may explore using Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) funds from...

Kerala High Court Questions State On Monitoring Of Waste Collection Agencies, Suggests Stronger Audit And CSR Coordination

Anamika MJ

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Anamika MJ

Kerala High Court Questions State On Monitoring Of Waste Collection Agencies, Suggests Stronger Audit And CSR Coordination

Anamika MJ

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Anamika MJ

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers