Kerala High Court Monthly Digest - May 2023 [Citations: 210 - 245]

Nominal Index Citations [2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 210-245]P.T. Sheejish v. Union of India & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 210 State of Kerala v. Sanith Jan and State of Kerala v. Arun 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 211St. Mary's Orthodox Church & Anr. v. State of Kerala & Ors. and other connected matters 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 212Kerala Public Service Commission v. State Disability Commissioner & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 213Muhammed Shiraz @Shiraz v. State of Kerala & Ors, 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 214 Antony C.L. v. Kerala Water Authority & Ors., 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 215Sujith Sreerengum V Sunil Sradheyam & Another, 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 216State of Kerala V Nino Mathew, 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 217Mahesh Thampi v. The Deputy Director of Education & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 218 Anoop K.A V. Biju Prabhakar 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 219Sanjeev S. v. State of Kerala 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 220Dhanya Martin v. State of Kerala & Anr. and other connected cases 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 221Jolly Vaerghese v. State of Kerala 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 222Jayaraj R. v. Kavya G. Nair 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 223Sreedevi S. & Ors. v. The Selection Committee, Chennithala, Thripperumthara Grama Panchayat & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 224Petro David v. State of Kerala, 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 225 Ratheesh Dasan V. State Of Kerala, 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 226Shantanu Yadav Rao Hire v. State of Kerala & Anr., 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 227Muhammed Abdulla Sha V State of Kerala, 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 228PNB Housing Finance Ltd. V. State Of Kerala, 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 229Unni Mukundan V State of Kerala, 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 230Vaduthala Juma-Ath Educational Trust & Ors. v. Kerala State Waqf Board & Anr., 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 231 Niyasali v. State of Kerala & Anr.Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 232T.K.Natarajan V T.K.Raman Achari,2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 233Vishnu v. State of Kerala & Anr. and other connected matters, 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 234Prema Joy V. John Britto, 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 235Nixy James V Kerala State Road Transport Corporation, 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 236Raveendran P.T. v. State of Kerala & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 237Santhosh Kumar v. The High Court of Kerala & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 238 Mohandas P.D V. The District Geologist 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 239D. Babu v. C. Shaji & Anr. 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 240Jimmy Thomas V. Indian Bank 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 241Zonal Manager, Life Insurance Corporation of India & Ors. v. Rosamma Varkey 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 242P Nanikutty V. K U Kalpakadevi 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 243Joseph Thomas V State of Kerala 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 244Sabu M. Jacob v. Union of India & Ors. 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 245 Judgments/Orders This Month Railway Stops Not To Be Provided On Personal Demands Or Vested Interests For High Speed Express Trains Like 'Vande Bharat': Kerala High CourtCase Title: P.T. Sheejish v. Union of India & Ors.Citation: 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 210The Kerala High Court dismissed a plea by a lawyer seeking a direction to be issued to the Southern Railways for permitting a stop for the 'Vande Bharat Train Service' at Tirur Railway Station at Malappuram District.It was alleged by the petitioner that despite Malappuram being a densely populated area, with a large number of people depending on train services for travel, a stop had not been allotted for the district. It was also averred that an earlier proposal to allot a stop at Tirur did not fructify, without any specific reason.Dismissing the plea which alleged that the failure to allot a stop at Tirur Railway Station was an injustice to the people of Malappuram District, the Division Bench comprising Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas and Justice C. Jayachandran observed that there was no public interest espoused in the present writ petition.'Bond' Not Sufficient Security For Releasing Accident Vehicle Not Having Third Party Insurance: Kerala High Court Explains Motor Vehicle RulesCase Title: State of Kerala v. Sanith Jan and State of Kerala v. ArunCitation: 2023 LiveLaw (Ker) 211The Kerala High Court recently elaborated upon the nature of security contemplated under Rule 391A of the Kerala Motor Vehicle Rules, 1989 (hereinafter 'Rules, 1989') for the purposes of releasing a vehicle involved in an accident if it was not covered by a valid policy of insurance against third party risks at the time of the accident.Justice Bechu Kurian Thomas held that,"the word 'sufficient security' in Rule 391A of the Rules means a security from which the amount, when awarded, can easily be recovered, that too without any further litigation".Elaborating on the same further, the single Judge added,"Ideally, a cash deposit or a bank guarantee or fixed deposit receipts or other modes of security from which the amount when awarded, can easily be recovered, should be the nature of security to be furnished under Rule 391A. Executing a bond for the amount directed cannot, in the circumstances, be treated as sufficient security".Church Feud: Kerala High Court Grants Police Protection To Orthodox Vicars Against Jacobite Faction, For Performing Rites In Six ChurchesCase Title: St. Mary's Orthodox Church & Anr....

Kerala High Court Monthly Digest - May 2023 [Citations: 210 - 245]

Navya Benny

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Kerala High Court Monthly Digest - May 2023 [Citations: 210 - 245]

Navya Benny

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers