Kerala High Court Weekly Roundup: May 04 - May 10, 2026

Nominal Index [Citations: 2026 LiveLaw (Ker) 232 - 251]Sudeep K.T. v. Malabar Cancer Centre and Anr., 2026 LiveLaw (Ker) 232Shamsudheen C. v. State of Kerala and Ors. , 2026 LiveLaw (Ker) 233Mavelipuram Resident's Association v. GCDA and Ors. , 2026 LiveLaw (Ker) 234M/S RCC-ACC (JV) v. Board of Major Port Authority for Port of Cochin and Anr. , 2026 LiveLaw (Ker) 235Moosantepurakkal Manaf v. State of Kerala, 2026 LiveLaw (Ker) 236Musthafa v. State of Kerala, 2026 LiveLaw (Ker) 237Rajkumar v. State of Kerala and Anr. , 2026 LiveLaw (Ker) 238Vinu Vikraman v. State of Kerala and Anr. , 2026 LiveLaw (Ker) 239Anil N v. State of Kerala, 2026 LiveLaw (Ker) 240K.N. Ambika v. Kerala State Electricity Board Ltd. and Ors. , 2026 LiveLaw (Ker) 241The District Collector and Ors. v. Sujaya A.B. , 2026 LiveLaw (Ker) 242Kannur District Panchayath Employees and Pensioners v. Kannur District Panchayat and Ors. , 2026 LiveLaw (Ker) 243Edamana Vasudevan Namboothiri v. Malabar Devswom Board and Ors. , 2026 LiveLaw (Ker) 244Pradeep Bharathan. K v. The State of Kerala and Ors., 2026 LiveLaw (Ker) 245M/s. Panjos Builders Private Limited & Anr. v. Panjos Garden Apartment Owners Association & Ors. , 2026 LiveLaw (Ker) 246Moideenkutty v. Kerala State Minority Commission and Ors. , 2026 LiveLaw (Ker) 247P.K. Lakshmi and Ors. v Gopi and Ors. and connected matter, 2026 LiveLaw (Ker) 248Dyna Scaria @ Thresiamma v Vernin Varkey @ John, 2026 LiveLaw (Ker) 249Joseph @ Sabu v. State of Kerala, 2026 LiveLaw (Ker) 250Sreerosh Developers Private Limited v. State of Kerala and Ors. , 2026 LiveLaw (Ker) 251Judgments/ Orders This WeekAppeal Remedy No Bar To Writ Jurisdiction Where Penalty 'Disproportionate' To Charges: Kerala High CourtCase Title: Sudeep K.T. v. Malabar Cancer Centre and Anr.Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Ker) 232The Kerala High Court, in a recent ruling, clarified that writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India can be invoked to challenge orders that imposed penalty 'disproportionate' to charges even if appeal remedy available.Justice Harisankar V. Menon was considering a plea preferred by the former Head of the Department (Department of Engineering and Maintenance) of Malabar Cancer Centre challenging his dismissal from service.Kerala High Court Dismisses PIL Against Dam Tourism Tender With ₹10K Costs, Calls It 'Proxy Litigation'Case Title: Shamsudheen C. v. State of Kerala and Ors.Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Ker) 233The Kerala High Court recently dismissed a public interest litigation that challenged the results of a tender process for the purpose of conducting tourism activities in Kanjirapuzha dam.The Division Bench of Chief Justice Soumen Sen and Justice Syam Kumar V.M. noted that the participants of the tender had accepted the results and the present PIL preferred by a stranger to the tender process amounted to a 'proxy litigation', intended to delay the project. It went on to impose exemplary costs on the litigant.Authority Can't Reclaim Recreational Land In Housing Scheme By Citing Expiry Of Lease: Kerala High CourtCase Title: Mavelipuram Resident's Association v. GCDA and Ors.Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Ker) 234The Kerala High Court recently held that public authority cannot initiate eviction proceedings over areas offered for recreational purposes through housing scheme, by citing expiry of lease deed.Justice P.M. Manoj was considering a writ petition challenging the proceedings initiated under the Kerala Public Buildings (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1968 for evicting persons of the Mavelipuram Residents Association from the recreation hall constructed by them.Writ Jurisdiction Can't Be Invoked When Contract Provides Arbitration Remedy: Kerala High CourtCase Title: M/S RCC-ACC (JV) v. Board of Major Port Authority for Port of Cochin and Anr.Citation: 2026 LiveLaw (Ker) 235The Kerala High Court has reaffirmed that the existence of an efficacious alternative remedy, particularly arbitration, will ordinarily dissuade courts from exercising writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.The Division Bench comprising Chief Justice Soumen Sen and Justice Syam Kumar V.M. was delivering the judgment in a writ appeal challenging the termination of an EPC contract by the Cochin Port Authority.S.307 IPC | Manner Of Attack & Injury Relevant To Ascertain If Accused Intentionally Attempted To Commit Murder: Kerala High CourtCase Title: Moosantepurakkal Manaf v. State of KeralaCitation: 2026 LiveLaw (Ker) 236The Kerala High Court has reiterated that the manner of attack and injury of the victim are relevant for ascertaining if the accused had intention or knowledge that the same would cause death.Justice A. Badharudeen found that causing only one injury on the shoulder of the victim would not be sufficient to conclude that an accused intended to cause murder to attract the offence punishable under Section 307 IPC.Non-Disclosure Of Exact Occurrence Date In Earlier Statements Not Necessarily Fatal If POCSO...

Kerala High Court Weekly Roundup: May 04 - May 10, 2026

K. Salma Jennath

Tags