Madhya Pradesh High Court
CCS Rules | Borrowing Institute And Not Parent Institute Can Initiate Disciplinary Action Against Employee On Deputation: Madhya Pradesh High Court
Clearing the air about the authority of a lending institute to conduct an enquiry on allegations pertaining to the period when the employee was on deputation, the Madhya Pradesh High Court held that the authority lies solely with the borrowing department as per Rule 20 of Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965.A single judge bench of Justice Maninder S....
Contracts Of Employment Not Specifically Enforceable When There Is No Element Of Statutory Governance: Madhya Pradesh High Court Reiterates
Madhya Pradesh High Court has recently made an observation that when contracts of employment are governed purely by the terms of the contract without any element of statutory governance, such contracts that determine the relationship between the master and the servant are not specifically enforceable.“This Court in WP No.29/2023 (Purushottam Suryabanshi Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh and...
Sidhi Urination Case: MP High Court Upholds Accused's NSA Detention, Says His One Act Threatened Peace & Tranquility In Entire State
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has dismissed a habeas corpus plea filed by the wife of the accused detenu in Sidhi urination case, challenging his preventive detention. The Division Bench of Chief Justice Ravi Malimath and Justice Vishal Mishra said the authorities have rightly complied with the provisions of the National Security Act, 1980 while initiating proceedings against Pravesh Shukla...
Wife Having A Degree Of Higher Education Can't Be Basis To Disentitle Her To Maintenance: Madhya Pradesh High Court
The Madhya Pradesh High Court last week observed that if a wife has a degree of higher education, it cannot be the basis of disentitling her to maintenance. A bench of Justice Prem Narayan Singh held so while upholding an order of the Family Court awarding maintenance of Rs.10,000/- per month to a wife. In its order, the Court pointed out that Section 125 of CrPC is a piece...
High-Level Caste Scrutiny Committee Has Jurisdiction Only When ‘Correctness’ of Caste Certificate Is at Issue, Not When the Certificate Itself Is ‘Forged’: MP HC
The Jabalpur Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court has recently iterated the clear distinction that exists between ‘forged’ documents and documents that can be regarded as ‘doubtful or false’. While adjudicating a plea raised by one of the candidates seeking a direction to appoint him to the post of ‘Patwari’, the Single Judge Bench of Justice Gurpal Singh Ahluwalia refused to set...
Election Petition Decided Without Framing Issues Violates Principles Of Natural Justice: Madhya Pradesh High Court
In a recent ruling, the Madhya Pradesh High Court emphasized the critical requirement of framing issues as per Order 14 Rule 1of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC) for the adjudication of election petitions related to Panchayat matters.Justice Subodh Abhyankar observed,“...on perusal of the impugned order it is apparent that the issues have not been framed. In such circumstances, it cannot be...
Offence U/S 294 IPC Not Attracted In Absence Of Allegations Of Annoyance, Usage Of Obscene Words: Madhya Pradesh High Court
The Madhya Pradesh High Court last week held that the absence of allegations of annoyance and alleged stated words to be obscene words cannot attract the charge under Section 294 of IPC. The bench of Justice Dinesh Kumar Paliwal added that when it is not clear in the prosecution’s case as to what obscene words were stated by the accused, then merely saying that the accused had...
Create WhatsApp Groups For Summoning Witnesses In Criminal Trials But Ensure Privacy: Madhya Pradesh High Court Suggests To Police
In a notable development, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has instructed the Director General of Police (DGP) and the Director of Prosecution to seriously consider the creation of WhatsApp groups for each criminal case for summoning witnesses.Justice Anand Pathak observed, “It is earnestly believed by this Court that Director General of Police and Director, Prosecution shall seriously take...
Madhya Pradesh High Court Directs All State Courts To Strictly Follow Supreme Court's 'Arnesh Kumar Guidelines'
The Madhya Pradesh High Court on Wednesday issued a circular for all the Sessions and criminal courts in the state directing them to strictly follow the guidelines issued by the Supreme Court in the 2014 Arnesh Kumar Judgment on arrests. The circular has been issued in pursuance of directions of the Supreme Court of India, in the case of Md. Asfak Alam vs. The State of Jharkhand...
Husband-Wife Sexual Relations Not Restricted To Procreation, Can't Define Any Act Beyond 'Natural' Sex B/w Them As ‘Unnatural’: MP High Court
Holding that a husband cannot be prosecuted under Section 377 IPC (Unnatural Offence) in view of Section 375 IPC (Rape) which exempts marital sex and also covers all possible penile penetration, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has observed that if anything is done between them apart from the deemed natural sexual intercourse, the same cannot be defined as ‘unnatural’. The bench...
Can't Prosecute A Husband U/S 377 IPC As S. 375 IPC Exempting Marital Sex Covers All Possible Penile Penetration: MP High Court
In a significant observation liable to add to the ongoing debate regarding the criminalisation of marital rape, the Madhya PradeshHigh Court has observed that after the 2013 amendment to the definition of Section 375 IPC (Rape), there is no place for any unnatural offence (as per Section 377 IPC) to take place between a husband and wife. The Court made this observation while quashing an...
Transfer Order Can Be Passed In Administrative Exigency But Not As Punishment: Madhya Pradesh High Court
The Madhya Pradesh High Court recently invalidated a transfer order and a relieving order issued to an individual holding the position of Superintendent Engineer within the M.P. Paschim Kshetra Vidyut Vitran Company Limited in Indore - characterizing them as punitive and malicious.The division bench of Justices S. A. Dharmadhikari and Hirdesh observed, “Admittedly, there is approval of...









