Can't Allow Fraudsters To Take Advantage Of Reservations For Differently Abled Candidates: Madhya Pradesh High Court Proposes 3-Tier Scrutiny For PwD Category

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has proposed constituting a three-tier scrutiny system for issuing disability certificates to candidates seeking public employment.A single-judge bench of Justice Vivek Agarwal was hearing a plea filed by the National Federation Of The Blind (MP) against the dismissive attitude of the state government in appointing visually impaired persons as per statutory requirements.“…It is also expected from the State that they will not permit any fraudester to take advantage of the provisions for reservation of differently-abled persons by misrepresenting themselves to be either visually impaired, hearing impaired or orthopedically handicapped or with other disabilities and they will ensure a three-tier system for scrutiny of such differently-abled persons so that one Doctor may not be sufficient to issue a certificate”, the bench sitting at Jabalpur held.The court has mandated that after a candidate gets selected, there will be a District Level Committee in the District Hospital to issue a disability certificate on the first level. The certificate so issued will be scrutinised at the Divisional level by a separate team for verification. On the third level, these two certificates will be jointly verified at the level of Government Medical College catering to the concerned Districts and Divisions.Justice Vivek Agarwal also emphasised that the state is dutybound to work out the backlogs in appointments that have occurred since 1996 and fill the vacancies according to the percentages stipulated for each category, keeping in mind that 'horizontal reservation' applies to Persons with Disabilities (PwD). Even reservations in promotions cannot be denied to PwD, the court observed by referring to Reserve Bank of India & Ors. Vs. A.K. Niar & Ors. (2023) Live Law (SC) 521.“….Hon'ble Supreme Court has drawn the distinction between 'Vertical' reservations for backward classes of citizens…and 'Horizontal' reservations for persons with disabilities…holding that ceiling of 50% reservation applies only to reservation in favour of other Backward classes under Article 16(4) of the Constitution of India whereas the reservation in favour of persons with disabilities is horizontal, which is under Article 16(1) of the Constitution”, the court clarified by referring to Union of India & another v.. National Federation of the Blind & Ors. (2013)10 SCC 772.FactsAccording to Section 33 of the Persons With Disabilities (Equal Opportunities Protection of Rights and Full Participation) Act, 1995, and the subsequent notification issued by the state government in 2001, visually impaired persons were entitled to 2% reservation out of the 6% earmarked for differently-abled persons. A plea was filed before the High Court for implementation of the policy, and thereafter, when the state refused to adhere to the directions issued, the High Court also issued a slew of directions in a contempt petition from 2013.Soon thereafter, in 2013, the Government of India issued an office memorandum after incorporating the gist of the landmark judgment in Union of India & Another v. National Federation of Blind & Ors.(2013). The office memorandum required the "appropriate Government" to compute the number of vacancies available in all the "establishments" and further identify the posts for disabled persons within three months.Later, with the promulgation of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, new categories were added to the types of disabled persons due to which the quota of visually impaired persons was altered to 1.5% out of 6 % allotted for PwD, as per the office memorandum dated 03.07.2018.Court's Observations & Further DirectionsThe petitioner's counsel contended that the state did not grant reservation to the visually impaired as contemplated in the 2001 notification; the state justified the same by saying that there was no recruitment from 1996 to 2012. On that point, the court agreed with the petitioner's counsel to hold that 'horizontal reservation' applies to PwD which makes them entitled to reservation even in any recruitments made for other reserved categories like Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes or Other Backward Classes during this period. From 2013-2018, 2922 posts were advertised as available in various departments for the differently abled. Out of this, 2056 posts were filled, leaving 866 posts vacant. The counsel for the petitioner argued that proportionality stipulated in the memorandum about the allocation of available seats to each category of differently abled had not been followed. State argued that an employer can exclude certain posts from the ambit of the reservation to a particular category. However, the petitioner replied that no specific notification had been issued by the Chief Commissioner or State Commissioner making any exemptions for certain posts.About the instances of state machinery joining hands with fraudsters to fake disability, the court noted:“…State will form District Medical...

Can't Allow Fraudsters To Take Advantage Of Reservations For Differently Abled Candidates: Madhya Pradesh High Court Proposes 3-Tier Scrutiny For PwD Category

Sebin James

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Sebin James

Can't Allow Fraudsters To Take Advantage Of Reservations For Differently Abled Candidates: Madhya Pradesh High Court Proposes 3-Tier Scrutiny For PwD Category

Sebin James

This is a premium content Available exclusively to Our subscribers

INR 1099+GST

Tags

Sebin James

This is a premium content
Available exclusively to
Our subscribers