Madhya Pradesh High Court Monthly Digest: March 2025

Citation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 42 to 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 69Nominal Index:Deepankar Vishwas Versus State Of Madhya Pradesh Through P.S. Omti, District Jabalpur 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 42Murli Manohar Soni Vs. State Of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 43Kishore Deepak Kodwani And Others Versus State Of M.P. And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 44Rajendra Soni Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 45Swati Agrawal Versus Union Of India & Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 46Mahesh Kumar Koli and Another Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 47Amitabh Gupta Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 48Vivek Kumar Sharma versus The State of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 49X v/s Y 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 50Neeraj Nigam Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 51Munshilal Dhakad Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 52Dr. Leela Mittal And Others Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 53The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Public Health Engineering And Others Versus Balwant Singh Mandloi 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 54R Versus S 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 55Bhagban Singh Parmar Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 56The State of Madhya Pradesh v. Amit Gautam 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 57Dharam Singh Parihar Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 58Smt. Munni @ Madhuri Tiwari Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 59Ganesh Ram Kahar v. The State Of Madhya Pradesh 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 60Aaditya Narayan Pandey Vs. Union Of India And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 61Dineshchandra Shrivastava And Others Versus Smt. Anuradha Saxena And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 62Siddhi Paal Versus Kaushal Vikas Kshetriya Kaaryalaya And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 63Avnish Tripathi Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Ors 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 64X versus Y 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 65Shriram General Insurance Company Ltd. Versus Rakesh Valtiya And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 66Vyom Garg And Others Vs The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 67Prashant Gupta And Others Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 68Ramesh Kothari Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh And Others 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 69Final Orders/Judgements:Anticipatory Bail Plea Maintainable Even If Chargesheet Shows Accused As Declared Absconder: Madhya Pradesh HCCase Title: Deepankar Vishwas Versus State Of Madhya Pradesh Through P.S. Omti, District JabalpurCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 42The Jabalpur bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court while answering a reference made by a single judge, clarified that an anticipatory bail plea is maintainable even if the chargesheet filed shows the accused as a declared absconder.The court further ruled that an anticipatory bail plea is maintainable even when proceedings under CrPC Section 82 (Proclamation for person absconding) & 83 (Attachment of property of person absconding) or Section 299 (Record of evidence in absence of accused) have been initiated against the accused or when the accused has been declared as absconder/proclaimed offender.'Disclose Social Media Passwords, Provide Body Fluids, Blood Samples If Required By IO': MP High Court Directs Accused Seeking BailCase title: Murli Manohar Soni Vs. State Of Madhya PradeshCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 43Granting anticipatory bail to a man booked under Section 69 of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (Sexual intercourse by employing deceitful means, etc.), the Madhya Pradesh High Court recently imposed some unusual bail conditions on him.A bench of Justice Devnarayan Mishra directed the accused to cooperate with the investigating agency, submit all electronic gadgets, such as laptops and mobiles, and disclose his passwords for all social media platforms, such as Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, etc.Traffic Congestion: Madhya Pradesh High Court Orders Dismantling Of BRTS Corridor In Indore CityCase Title: Kishore Deepak Kodwani And Others Versus State Of M.P. And OthersCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 44While hearing a plea in nature of Public Interest Litigation questioning the utility and necessity of construction of Bus Rapid Transit System (BRTS Corridor) in the city of Indore, the Madhya Pradesh High Court has directed the State to remove the BRTS corridor as it has lost its utility in the present day scenario.Madhya Pradesh High Court Issues Contempt Notice To State Social Justice Department's Joint Director For 'Misquoting' Court OrderCase Title: Rajendra Soni Versus The State Of Madhya Pradesh And OthersCitation: 2025 LiveLaw (MP) 45The Gwalior Bench of Madhya Pradesh High Court has issued a contempt notice to Joint Director, Department of Social Justice and Empowerment of Persons with Disabilities in Gwalior for misquoting the court's order to state that 'skilled grade' benefit was being granted to the petitioner under the court's directions.The high court in its order noted that Joint Director had "deliberately passed an erroneous...

Madhya Pradesh High Court Monthly Digest: March 2025

Anukriti Mishra