Plea In Madras High Court Seeks Quashing Of TVK Candidate Aadhav Arjuna's Nomination, Says He Concealed Material Information

A plea has been filed in the Madras High Court challenging the acceptance of the nomination of Tamilaga Vettri Kazhagam (TVK) candidate Aadhav Arjuna, alleging that he concealed material information in nomination papers. The petitioner, Devarajan from Chennai, alleges that Arjuna has concealed material information in his nomination papers and the returning officer for the Vilivakkam Assembly Constituency should not have accepted his nomination. The plea thus seeks to quash his nomination. The petitioner, who is an independent candidate contesting from the same assembly constituency, submitted that Form 26 (affidavit filed by the candidate along with the nomination paper before the returning officer) mandates that a candidate, contestinig in the elections, should disclose his/her income, details of the assets (both movable and immovable) owned by the candidate, his/her spouse and all dependents. The petitioner submitted that the candidate is also mandated to include details of investment in bonds, debentures/shares, and units in companies/mutual funds, etc. The petitioner submits that he came to know that Arjuna, in his election affidavit, has not disclosed full, correct, and true information regarding his criminal antecedents, assets, and liabilities, and that of his spouse, and has thus suppressed material information. He pointed out that Arjuna had not provided details of the private limited companies in which his wife was serving as a Director, holding majority shares, and which are her personal assets. This non-disclosure, according to Devarajan, amounts to material suppression. The petitioner submits that though he had given a complaint/objection to the returning officer, the same was rejected without conducting any due inquiry or without giving him any opportunity of being heard. The petitioner has thus argued that the returning officer has failed to look into the veracity of the contents of the written objection/complaint and rejected it on the same day, which shows non-application of mind and the hasty manner in which the complaints are handled. He has thus sought to challenge the order of the returning officer, rejecting his objections and the subsequent acceptance of Arjuna's nomination. Case Title: G Devarajan v The Returning Officer and Another Case No: WP 66596/2026 (filing no)

Plea In Madras High Court Seeks Quashing Of TVK Candidate Aadhav Arjuna's Nomination, Says He Concealed Material Information

Upasana Sajeev

Tags